법무법인 프런티어
Franchise Fair Trade (KFTC) Disputes Lawyer
Franchise Fair Trade (KFTC) Disputes Lawyer | Understanding disclosure, disputes, and KFTC enforcement
Franchise relationships in Korea are regulated primarily by the Fair Trade Commission under the Act on the Fairness of Franchise Transactions (가맹사업거래의 공정화에 관한 법률), which requires franchisors to provide a registered information disclosure document before signing a contract and prohibits a defined list of unfair trade practices. Disputes arise both from KFTC-initiated investigations into franchisors and from franchisee complaints alleging false or exaggerated information, unjustified contract termination, or abusive exercise of bargaining power. Outcomes typically turn on what was actually disclosed in writing, when it was disclosed, and whether the franchisor's conduct falls within the statute's enumerated categories of unfair practice.
Franchise Fair Trade (KFTC) Disputes | What counts as a violation under the Franchise Business Act
The Franchise Business Act (가맹사업거래의 공정화에 관한 법률) does not leave 'unfairness' undefined. It lists specific categories of prohibited conduct, and most enforcement actions and civil claims are built around one or more of these categories.
Franchisors must register an information disclosure document with the Fair Trade Commission and provide it to a prospective franchisee at least 14 days before the contract is signed (가맹사업거래의 공정화에 관한 법률 제7조). Providing it late, providing an unregistered or outdated version, or omitting required financial and litigation history disclosures is a common basis for both KFTC sanctions and civil rescission claims.
Franchisors may not provide false or exaggerated information about expected sales, profitability, or costs, nor withhold information that would materially affect the franchisee's decision (가맹사업거래의 공정화에 관한 법률 제9조). Disputes here almost always come down to what specific sales projections or cost figures were communicated and in what form — verbal promises are far harder to prove than written estimates.
This provision prohibits a broad category including unjustified refusal to renew, unfair restriction on the purchase of goods/services from designated suppliers, imposing unjustified disadvantages, and unfair interference with business operations (가맹사업거래의 공정화에 관한 법률 제12조). Many franchisee-side complaints to the KFTC center on this article.
Franchisors must return certain franchise fees if the disclosure document was not provided as required, or if the contract is not concluded, under conditions set out in the statute (가맹사업거래의 공정화에 관한 법률 제10조). This becomes relevant where a prospective franchisee paid an initial fee before receiving proper disclosure.
Before litigation, many disputes are first routed through the Korea Fair Trade Mediation Agency for mediation (가맹사업거래의 공정화에 관한 법률 제22조 및 제23조 관련 조정 절차). Whether mediation is mandatory or optional depends on how the complaint was filed and the nature of the claim.
Civil claims run in parallel with administrative sanctions
A KFTC corrective order or fine against a franchisor does not automatically compensate the franchisee; separate civil litigation for damages or contract rescission is usually necessary to recover money. Conversely, a franchisor can face both an administrative investigation and a civil suit over the same facts, so strategy in one track needs to account for the other.
Franchise Fair Trade (KFTC) Disputes | The information disclosure document is the center of most disputes
Nearly every franchise dispute, whether initiated by the KFTC or by a franchisee's civil claim, starts with the question of what the disclosure document said and whether it was given on time.
What must be disclosed
The disclosure document must cover the franchisor's financial status, litigation history, the franchise fee structure, and estimated costs of starting the business, among other items required under the statute (가맹사업거래의 공정화에 관한 법률 제7조 및 시행령). Franchisors who prepare a generic or outdated document risk exposure even if no bad faith was involved.
The 14-day rule
A franchisor cannot receive a franchise fee or have the franchisee sign a contract until at least 14 days have passed since the disclosure document (and, where applicable, a precontractual information statement) was provided (가맹사업거래의 공정화에 관한 법률 제7조 제3항). If this sequence was not followed, that alone can be raised as a procedural defect regardless of whether the disclosed content itself was accurate.
Estimated sales and profit figures
Where a franchisor provides an expected sales or profit estimate, it must be based on reasonable grounds and retained in writing for a set period; the KFTC has separately issued guidance requiring documentation of the basis for such estimates. Franchisees alleging inflated projections need to show what figure was actually communicated and how it diverged from realistic operating conditions.
Franchise Fair Trade (KFTC) Disputes | Unfair trade practices franchisees most often raise
Article 12 covers a wide range of conduct, but in practice complaints cluster around a handful of recurring scenarios.
Unjustified refusal to renew
Franchisees who have operated for 10 years or less generally have a right to request renewal, and a franchisor's refusal must fall within specific statutory grounds such as repeated breach of contract terms (가맹사업거래의 공정화에 관한 법률 제13조). Refusals outside those grounds, or refusals dressed up as a routine non-renewal, are a frequent basis for dispute.
Forced purchasing and territory encroachment
Requiring franchisees to purchase goods or services only from designated suppliers at unreasonable terms, or opening a new outlet too close to an existing one without adequate grounds, can constitute unfair interference with business under Article 12. Whether the restriction was 'necessary to maintain brand identity' versus merely profitable for the franchisor is usually the contested issue.
Unjustified termination
Terminating a franchise agreement requires prior written notice and an opportunity to cure within a reasonable period, except in cases the statute recognizes as immediate grounds for termination (가맹사업거래의 공정화에 관한 법률 제14조). A termination notice that skips this cure period is one of the more straightforward grounds franchisees raise.
Franchise Fair Trade (KFTC) Disputes | How a KFTC investigation or mediation actually unfolds
Whether you are a franchisor responding to a complaint or a franchisee filing one, the administrative track has its own timeline and evidentiary expectations that differ from ordinary civil litigation.
Triggering an investigation
Investigations can start from a franchisee complaint, an industry-wide ex officio review, or a referral from mediation that failed to resolve. Franchisors typically receive a request for materials and a written explanation before any on-site investigation, and how that initial response is drafted often shapes the rest of the case.
Corrective orders and fines
If a violation is found, the KFTC can issue a corrective order, impose a fine, or refer the matter for criminal prosecution in serious cases (가맹사업거래의 공정화에 관한 법률 제33조, 제34조, 제41조). A corrective order compels specific conduct going forward but does not itself award damages to the franchisee.
Mediation as an alternative track
Franchisees and franchisors can request mediation through the Korea Fair Trade Mediation Agency, which can result in a settlement without a formal administrative sanction. Many disputes are resolved this way faster than through investigation or litigation, though mediation requires both sides' willingness to negotiate.
Franchise Fair Trade (KFTC) Disputes | From initial consultation to resolution
We review the disclosure document, franchise agreement, correspondence, and any KFTC notices already received to identify which statutory provisions are actually at issue.
We assess whether the matter should proceed through KFTC mediation, a formal complaint, a defense response to an ongoing investigation, or a direct civil claim, since these tracks carry different timelines and remedies.
For franchisors, this means preparing a written response to KFTC information requests or a defense against a complaint. For franchisees, this means compiling evidence of disclosure failures or unfair practices to support a complaint or mediation request.
We represent the client through KFTC fact-finding, hearings, or mediation sessions, including negotiating settlement terms where appropriate.
Where an administrative resolution does not fully address damages, we advise on and pursue separate civil litigation for compensation or contract rescission.
Franchise Fair Trade (KFTC) Disputes | How fees are typically structured
Set based on whether the matter is a KFTC response/defense, a mediation representation, or a full civil lawsuit, and on the complexity of the disclosure and transaction history involved.
Where the matter results in monetary recovery (for franchisees) or a favorable settlement/reduced sanction (for franchisors), a success fee proportional to the outcome may apply, agreed in advance.
Complex disputes may require accounting review of sales/profit estimates or expert opinion on industry standards, billed separately as incurred.
Representation limited to Korea Fair Trade Mediation Agency proceedings is typically billed at a lower flat rate than full litigation, reflecting the shorter timeline.
※ Costs vary depending on case complexity and specific circumstances; exact fees will be provided during consultation. No specific outcome is guaranteed.
Franchise Fair Trade (KFTC) Disputes | Self-Check
1️⃣ For Prospective or Current Franchisees
- Did you receive the registered information disclosure document at least 14 days before signing or paying any fee?
- Were specific sales or profit figures given to you in writing, or only verbally?
- Has the franchisor tried to terminate your agreement without written notice and a chance to cure?
- Are you being required to purchase supplies only from a designated vendor at above-market prices?
- Has your renewal request near the 10-year mark been refused without a statutory ground?
2️⃣ For Franchisors Facing a Complaint or Investigation
- Can you produce a registered disclosure document that matches what was actually provided to the franchisee?
- Do you have written records showing when the disclosure document was delivered relative to the contract date?
- Is there documentation supporting the basis for any sales or profit estimates you communicated?
- Did any termination notice you issued include the required advance notice and cure period?
- Have you already responded to a KFTC information request, and if so, does that response need to be reconciled with new evidence?
3️⃣ Choosing Between Mediation and Litigation
- Is the other party likely willing to negotiate, or has communication already broken down?
- Is the primary goal monetary compensation, contract rescission, or simply stopping ongoing conduct?
- Would a KFTC corrective order alone address your goals, or do you need a civil damages claim as well?
- Is there a filing deadline or statute of limitations issue that makes mediation too slow an option?
Frequently Asked Questions
Official References
개인정보처리방침
제 1 조 수집하는 개인정보의 항목, 목적, 방법
제 2 조 개인정보의 처리 및 보유기간
제 3 조 개인정보의 제3자 제공
제 4 조 개인정보 처리업무의 위탁
제 5 조 정보주체의 권리·의무 및 그 행사방법
제 6 조 개인정보의 파기
제 7 조 의견수렴 및 불만처리
제 8 조 개인정보 처리방침의 변경
제 9 조 개인정보의 안전성 확보 조치
제 1 조 (수집하는 개인정보의 항목, 목적, 방법)
① 게시판 글 작성 시 필수 항목에 대한 수집목적은 ‘별도의 구체적 상담을 위하여’이며 수집항목은 ‘이름, 이메일, 연락처’입니다.
② 전항 외에 고객의 서비스 이용 과정이나 요청 사항 처리 과정에서 ‘IP주소, 접속로그, 단말기 및 환경정보, 서비스 이용기록, 쿠키’와 같은 정보들이 자동으로 수집 및 저장될 수 있으며, 이 때의 수집목적은 ‘사용자 홈페이지 이용, 사이트 이용에 대한 문의 민원 등 고객 고충 처리’입니다.
③ 사무소는 ‘홈페이지 고객 문의/고충 처리 시 전화 또는 인터넷을 통한 상담’과 같은 방법으로 개인정보를 수집합니다
제 2 조 (개인정보의 처리 및 보유기간)
관계법령의 규정에 따라 개인정보를 보존하여야 하는 의무가 있는 경우가 아닌 한, 정보주체의 개인정보는 원칙적으로 해당 개인정보의 처리목적이 달성될 때까지 보유 및 이용되며, 그 목적이 달성되면 지체 없이 파기됩니다.
제 3 조 (개인정보의 제3자 제공)
사무소는 정보주체의 개인정보를 본 처리방침에서 명시한 목적에 한해서만 처리하며 정보주체의 사전동의가 있는 경우 또는 개인정보보호법 등 관계법령의 규정에 의거한 경우에만 개인정보를 제3자에게 제공합니다. 사무소는 현재 개인정보를 제3자에게 제공하지 않고 있습니다.
제 4 조 (개인정보 처리업무의 위탁)
사무소는 현재 귀하의 개인정보 보호를 위해 귀하의 개인정보를 직접 취급 관리하고 있습니다. 단, 향후 보다 전문적인 서비스를 제공하기 위하여 제3의 전문기관에 귀하의 정보를 위탁할 필요가 있다고 판단되는 경우, 귀하의 사전 동의 하에 개인정보에 대한 취급을 위탁할 수 있습니다.
제 5 조 (정보주체의 권리·의무 및 그 행사방법)
① 정보주체는 개인정보보호법 등 관계법령이 정하는 바에 따라 사무소에 대해 개인정보의 열람, 정정 및 삭제, 처리정지 요구 등 개인정보 보호 관련 권리를 행사할 수 있습니다.
② 제1항에 따른 권리행사는 정보주체의 법정대리인이나 위임을 받은 사람을 통해서도 할 수 있습니다. 다만, 이 경우에는 개인정보보호법 시행규칙에 따른 위임장을 사무소에 제출하여야 합니다.
③ 사무소는 정보주체의 권리행사에 대하여 개인정보보호법 등 관계법령이 정하는 바에 따라 지체 없이 조치하겠습니다.
제 6 조 (개인정보의 파기)
① 사무소는 원칙적으로 개인정보의 처리목적이 달성된 경우 등 그 개인정보가 불필요하게 되었을 때에는 지체 없이 해당 개인정보를 파기합니다.
② 사무소가 관계법령의 규정에 따라 개인정보를 파기하지 아니하고 보존하여야 하는 경우에는 해당 개인정보 또는 개인정보파일을 다른 개인정보와 분리해서 저장·관리 합니다.
③ 사무소는 파기사유가 발생한 개인정보를 선정하여 개인정보 보호책임자의 승인을 받아 해당 개인정보를 파기합니다.
④ 사무소는 파기하여야 할 개인정보가 전자적 파일 형태인 경우 복원이 불가능한 방법으로 영구 삭제하며, 이외의 기록물, 인쇄물, 서면, 그 밖의 기록매체인 경우 파쇄 또는 소각합니다.
제 7 조 (의견수렴 및 불만처리)
정보주체는 개인정보 보호 관련 문의, 불만처리, 피해구제 등에 관한 사항을 아래 개인정보 보호책임자 또는 담당부서에 문의하실 수 있습니다. 사무소는 정보주체의 문의에 대하여 신속하고 충분한 답변을 드릴 것입니다.
개인정보 보호 책임자 : 변호사
연락처 : 02.
제 8 조 (개인정보 처리방침의 변경)
사무소의 개인정보 처리방침은 관련 법령, 지침 및 사무소 내부규정에 따라 변경될 수 있으며, 개인정보 처리방침이 변경되는 경우 관련 법령이 정하는 방법에 따라 공개합니다.
제 9 조 (개인정보의 안전성 확보 조치)
사무소는 개인정보의 안전성 확보를 위해 다음과 같은 조치를 취하고 있습니다.
관리적 조치 : 내부관리계획의 수립 및 시행, 구성원에 대한 정기적인 개인정보 보호교육 등
기술적 조치 : 개인정보처리시스템 등의 접근권한 관리, 접근통제시스템 설치, 고유식별정보 등의 암호화, 보안프로그램의 설치 등
물리적 조치 : 전산실, 자료보관실 등 개인정보 보관장소에 대한 접근통제