Insurance Litigation Lawyer | What to do when the insurer says no
Summary
Insurance disputes arise when an insurer denies coverage, offers a payout far below what the policyholder or accident victim believes they are owed, or delays the review process indefinitely. Under Korean law, an insurer must pay out within a set period once a claim is filed, and unreasonable delay or refusal without proper grounds can itself become a legal issue (상법 제658조). Because insurance contracts are standardized documents drafted by the insurer, courts tend to interpret ambiguous clauses against the insurer that wrote them (약관의 규제에 관한 법률 제5조). This page is written from the claimant's perspective — the insured person or the accident victim seeking payment, not the insurance company.
Civil · InsuranceApplicable law: Commercial Act, Act on the Regulation of Terms and ConditionsFor: Policyholders & Accident Victims
Insurance Litigation | Common grounds insurers use to deny or reduce claims
Insurers rarely deny a claim outright without citing a reason. Understanding the reason they give is the first step to knowing whether it actually holds up.
Alleged breach of duty to disclose (pre-existing conditions)
Insurers frequently argue the policyholder failed to disclose a pre-existing illness or condition at the time of signing, which can allow the insurer to cancel the contract or deny the claim (상법 제651조). However, this right to cancel expires if the insurer does not exercise it within one month of learning the facts, and no later than three years after the contract began (상법 제651조). Whether the omission was intentional or grossly negligent, and whether the insurer's agent already knew the fact, are often the real battlegrounds.
Disputes over causation and exclusion clauses
Even where an accident or illness is not disputed, insurers often argue the specific cause falls under a policy exclusion, or that the injury was not the proximate cause of the loss claimed. Because exclusion clauses limit the insurer's liability, courts require them to be clear and to have been properly explained to the policyholder before signing; unexplained material terms may not bind the policyholder (약관의 규제에 관한 법률 제3조).
Dispute over degree of disability or extent of injury
In disability and personal accident insurance, insurers commonly rely on their own designated hospital's assessment to argue the disability grade is lower than the claimant believes, directly reducing the payout. Obtaining an independent medical opinion and comparing it against the insurer's assessment criteria is often central to resolving this dispute.
Insurance Litigation | Recurring dispute types by insurance product
The specific issue that ends up in litigation looks different depending on whether the policy is auto, health/disability, or fire/property insurance.
Auto insurance and underinsured/uninsured motorist claims
When the at-fault driver's insurer disputes the degree of fault or offers a settlement based on standardized injury tables that undervalue lost income or future care costs, the victim can reject the offer and pursue a direct claim or lawsuit rather than accepting the insurer's first number.
Health, disability, and critical illness insurance
Disputes here often center on whether a diagnosis meets the policy's specific definition of the covered illness, which can be narrower than the everyday medical definition. Reviewing the exact wording of the definition clause against the medical records is essential before accepting a denial.
Delay in claim review and payment
An insurer is generally required to complete its review and pay out within a set period after receiving all necessary documents; unnecessary requests for additional documents can function as a way to stall payment. Persistent, poorly justified delay can itself support a claim for the delay penalty in addition to the principal payout.
Insurance Litigation | From claim denial to resolution
1
Case review and document collection We review the policy terms, the insurer's denial letter, medical records, and accident reports to identify exactly which clause or fact the insurer is relying on.
2
Formal objection to the insurer Before litigation, a written objection or request for reassessment is often submitted, sometimes with an independent medical opinion, to see if the insurer will reconsider without going to court.
3
Dispute mediation or Financial Supervisory Service complaint For many disputes, filing a complaint with the Financial Supervisory Service or requesting dispute mediation can resolve the matter faster and at lower cost than litigation.
4
Filing the lawsuit If the insurer maintains its position, a civil lawsuit for the insurance payout is filed, often paired with a request for a court-appointed medical or damage assessment.
5
Trial, settlement, or judgment Many insurance cases are resolved through settlement once the assessment results come in; where no settlement is reached, the case proceeds to judgment.
Insurance Litigation | How fees are typically structured in insurance litigation
Retainer fee Usually based on the amount in dispute and the complexity of the medical or factual issues involved, rather than a flat rate.
Contingency fee Many insurance litigation cases include a success fee calculated as a percentage of the additional amount recovered above the insurer's original offer.
Medical assessment and expert fees Independent medical opinions or court-appointed assessments (damage rate, disability grade) carry separate costs that are usually advanced by the client and reimbursed from any recovery.
Litigation costs Court filing fees are calculated based on the amount claimed, and stamp fees, service fees, and appraisal costs are billed separately from legal fees.
※ Costs vary depending on case complexity and specific circumstances; exact fees will be provided during consultation. No specific outcome is guaranteed.
Insurance Litigation | Self-Check Before You Contact an Insurer's Lawyer
1️⃣ Just received a denial letter
Does the letter cite a specific policy clause number, or just a general reason?
Did the insurer explain this exclusion clause to you before you signed?
Is the denial based on non-disclosure, exclusion, or causation dispute?
Have you kept a copy of the original policy documents and denial letter?
2️⃣ Disagree with the payout amount offered
Did the insurer use its own designated hospital's assessment only?
Have you compared the offer against an independent medical opinion?
Does the offer account for future medical costs and lost earning capacity?
Are you being pressured to accept quickly before you can review the offer?
3️⃣ Insurer is delaying the review
How long has it been since you submitted all required documents?
Has the insurer requested the same documents multiple times?
Have you asked the insurer in writing for the reason for delay?
Have you considered a Financial Supervisory Service complaint?
4️⃣ Considering litigation
Have you calculated the gap between the insurer's offer and your claim amount?
Do you have medical records that support a different assessment?
Is there a statute of limitations issue approaching (see FAQ)?
Have you had a lawyer review the specific exclusion clause the insurer relies on?
Frequently Asked Questions
Q. How long do I have to sue an insurer after a claim is denied?
A. The right to claim insurance proceeds generally expires three years from the date the right can be exercised, such as the date of the accident or diagnosis (상법 제662조). This period can be interrupted by filing a formal claim with the insurer, but it is worth confirming the exact date with a lawyer before it lapses.
Q. The insurer says I didn't disclose a pre-existing condition. Does that automatically void my policy?
A. Not automatically. The insurer must show the non-disclosure was intentional or due to gross negligence, and the insurer's right to cancel on this ground expires one month after it learns of the fact and three years after the contract began (상법 제651조). If the insurer's own agent already knew the condition, this defense often fails.
Q. Can I reject the insurer's settlement offer and negotiate for more?
A. Yes. The initial offer, especially in auto accident cases, is often calculated using the insurer's internal standard tables, which may not reflect your actual lost income, future medical needs, or the true extent of disability. You are not obligated to accept the first offer, and you can request reassessment or pursue litigation.
Q. What is the Financial Supervisory Service complaint process, and should I use it before suing?
A. The Financial Supervisory Service accepts dispute mediation requests for insurance complaints and can be a faster, lower-cost route than litigation for straightforward disputes. It does not always bind the insurer to comply, so for larger or more contested claims, litigation may still be necessary regardless of the outcome.
Q. My disability grade was assessed lower than I expected. Can I challenge that?
A. Yes. Insurers often rely on assessments from their own designated hospitals, and obtaining an independent medical opinion is a common first step in disputing the grade. In litigation, the court can also order its own medical assessment through a court-appointed physician.
Q. Does it matter if the accident was partly my fault?
A. Comparative fault can reduce, but does not automatically eliminate, an insurer's payout obligation for many types of coverage; the exact effect depends on the specific policy terms and the type of insurance involved. This is one of the most heavily litigated issues in auto insurance disputes.
Q. What if the insurer keeps asking for more documents instead of paying?
A. An insurer is generally expected to complete review and payment within a set period once it has the documents reasonably necessary to assess the claim, and repeated, unnecessary document requests can be challenged as unjustified delay. Keeping a written record of every document request and submission date is important if the delay itself becomes an issue in litigation.
Q. Can I get a lawyer even for a relatively small claim?
A. Yes, though it is worth weighing legal costs against the disputed amount. For smaller claims, an initial consultation can help you decide whether a formal objection or Financial Supervisory Service complaint might resolve the matter without full litigation.
Q. Will suing the insurer affect my other policies with them?
A. Filing a legitimate legal claim to enforce your contractual rights should not itself be a basis for the insurer to cancel your other unrelated policies, but it is reasonable to review the terms of any other policies you hold with the same insurer before proceeding.
법무법인 프런티어(이하 “사무소”)는 개인정보보호법에 따라 정보주체의 개인정보 및 권익을 보호하고 개인정보와 관련된 정보주체의 고충을 신속하고 원활하게 처리하기 위하여 본 개인정보 처리방침을 수립·공개합니다.
제 1 조 수집하는 개인정보의 항목, 목적, 방법
제 2 조 개인정보의 처리 및 보유기간
제 3 조 개인정보의 제3자 제공
제 4 조 개인정보 처리업무의 위탁
제 5 조 정보주체의 권리·의무 및 그 행사방법
제 6 조 개인정보의 파기
제 7 조 의견수렴 및 불만처리
제 8 조 개인정보 처리방침의 변경
제 9 조 개인정보의 안전성 확보 조치
제 1 조 (수집하는 개인정보의 항목, 목적, 방법)
① 게시판 글 작성 시 필수 항목에 대한 수집목적은 ‘별도의 구체적 상담을 위하여’이며 수집항목은 ‘이름, 이메일, 연락처’입니다.
② 전항 외에 고객의 서비스 이용 과정이나 요청 사항 처리 과정에서 ‘IP주소, 접속로그, 단말기 및 환경정보, 서비스 이용기록, 쿠키’와 같은 정보들이 자동으로 수집 및 저장될 수 있으며, 이 때의 수집목적은 ‘사용자 홈페이지 이용, 사이트 이용에 대한 문의 민원 등 고객 고충 처리’입니다.
③ 사무소는 ‘홈페이지 고객 문의/고충 처리 시 전화 또는 인터넷을 통한 상담’과 같은 방법으로 개인정보를 수집합니다
제 2 조 (개인정보의 처리 및 보유기간)
관계법령의 규정에 따라 개인정보를 보존하여야 하는 의무가 있는 경우가 아닌 한, 정보주체의 개인정보는 원칙적으로 해당 개인정보의 처리목적이 달성될 때까지 보유 및 이용되며, 그 목적이 달성되면 지체 없이 파기됩니다.
제 3 조 (개인정보의 제3자 제공)
사무소는 정보주체의 개인정보를 본 처리방침에서 명시한 목적에 한해서만 처리하며 정보주체의 사전동의가 있는 경우 또는 개인정보보호법 등 관계법령의 규정에 의거한 경우에만 개인정보를 제3자에게 제공합니다. 사무소는 현재 개인정보를 제3자에게 제공하지 않고 있습니다.
제 4 조 (개인정보 처리업무의 위탁)
사무소는 현재 귀하의 개인정보 보호를 위해 귀하의 개인정보를 직접 취급 관리하고 있습니다. 단, 향후 보다 전문적인 서비스를 제공하기 위하여 제3의 전문기관에 귀하의 정보를 위탁할 필요가 있다고 판단되는 경우, 귀하의 사전 동의 하에 개인정보에 대한 취급을 위탁할 수 있습니다.
제 5 조 (정보주체의 권리·의무 및 그 행사방법)
① 정보주체는 개인정보보호법 등 관계법령이 정하는 바에 따라 사무소에 대해 개인정보의 열람, 정정 및 삭제, 처리정지 요구 등 개인정보 보호 관련 권리를 행사할 수 있습니다.
② 제1항에 따른 권리행사는 정보주체의 법정대리인이나 위임을 받은 사람을 통해서도 할 수 있습니다. 다만, 이 경우에는 개인정보보호법 시행규칙에 따른 위임장을 사무소에 제출하여야 합니다.
③ 사무소는 정보주체의 권리행사에 대하여 개인정보보호법 등 관계법령이 정하는 바에 따라 지체 없이 조치하겠습니다.
제 6 조 (개인정보의 파기)
① 사무소는 원칙적으로 개인정보의 처리목적이 달성된 경우 등 그 개인정보가 불필요하게 되었을 때에는 지체 없이 해당 개인정보를 파기합니다.
② 사무소가 관계법령의 규정에 따라 개인정보를 파기하지 아니하고 보존하여야 하는 경우에는 해당 개인정보 또는 개인정보파일을 다른 개인정보와 분리해서 저장·관리 합니다.
③ 사무소는 파기사유가 발생한 개인정보를 선정하여 개인정보 보호책임자의 승인을 받아 해당 개인정보를 파기합니다.
④ 사무소는 파기하여야 할 개인정보가 전자적 파일 형태인 경우 복원이 불가능한 방법으로 영구 삭제하며, 이외의 기록물, 인쇄물, 서면, 그 밖의 기록매체인 경우 파쇄 또는 소각합니다.
제 7 조 (의견수렴 및 불만처리)
정보주체는 개인정보 보호 관련 문의, 불만처리, 피해구제 등에 관한 사항을 아래 개인정보 보호책임자 또는 담당부서에 문의하실 수 있습니다. 사무소는 정보주체의 문의에 대하여 신속하고 충분한 답변을 드릴 것입니다.
개인정보 보호 책임자 : 변호사
연락처 : 02.
제 8 조 (개인정보 처리방침의 변경)
사무소의 개인정보 처리방침은 관련 법령, 지침 및 사무소 내부규정에 따라 변경될 수 있으며, 개인정보 처리방침이 변경되는 경우 관련 법령이 정하는 방법에 따라 공개합니다.
제 9 조 (개인정보의 안전성 확보 조치)
사무소는 개인정보의 안전성 확보를 위해 다음과 같은 조치를 취하고 있습니다.
관리적 조치 : 내부관리계획의 수립 및 시행, 구성원에 대한 정기적인 개인정보 보호교육 등
기술적 조치 : 개인정보처리시스템 등의 접근권한 관리, 접근통제시스템 설치, 고유식별정보 등의 암호화, 보안프로그램의 설치 등
물리적 조치 : 전산실, 자료보관실 등 개인정보 보관장소에 대한 접근통제