법무법인 프런티어
Industrial Accident Compensation Claim Lawyer
Industrial Accident Compensation Claim Lawyer | A step-by-step guide for injured workers
An industrial accident (산업재해) claim is a request for insurance benefits ‒ medical care, wage replacement, disability, or survivor benefits ‒ paid by the Korea Workers' Compensation and Welfare Service (근로복지공단) when a worker is injured or falls ill because of their job (산업재해보상보험법 제5조 제1호). The claim is filed against the Service, not the employer, so the employer's consent is not legally required to apply. The central issue in almost every case is whether the injury or illness has a recognized causal link to the work performed, and disputes over that link are the most common reason claims are denied or delayed.
Industrial Accident Compensation Claim | What counts as an industrial accident
The Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act defines several categories of covered accidents and diseases. Understanding which category applies helps clarify what evidence will matter most.
Injuries occurring while carrying out assigned work tasks, including accidents caused by facility defects, equipment malfunction, or acts required by the employer, are covered (산업재해보상보험법 제37조 제1항 제1호). The core question is whether the activity at the time of injury falls within the scope of duties, including preparatory or incidental acts.
Accidents that occur while commuting by a normal route and method between home and the workplace are also covered, since a 2018 amendment extended coverage to ordinary commutes regardless of the mode of transport provided by the employer (산업재해보상보험법 제37조 제1항 제3호). Significant detours or stops unrelated to commuting can affect coverage.
Diseases caused by exposure to harmful factors in the workplace, such as musculoskeletal disorders, occupational cancers, or mental disorders from workplace stress, are covered when a medical and legal causal link to the job can be shown (산업재해보상보험법 제37조 제1항 제2호). These cases often require longer investigation because causation is harder to establish than in a single-incident accident.
If work substantially worsens a pre-existing condition beyond its natural progression, the aggravation itself may be recognized as covered, even though the underlying disease existed before employment. Medical opinion on the pace and degree of deterioration becomes central to these claims.
Exclusions and limits to be aware of
Injuries caused mainly by a worker's own serious misconduct, or occurring during activities clearly outside the scope of work and commuting, can be excluded from coverage. Employment status also matters: coverage generally requires an employment relationship subject to the insurance, though many types of non-regular and platform workers have been progressively brought under coverage in recent years.
Industrial Accident Compensation Claim | How the recognition decision is made
The Korea Workers' Compensation and Welfare Service reviews each application and issues a decision on whether the injury or illness qualifies for benefits. This decision, not the employer's opinion, determines whether compensation is paid.
Who decides, and on what basis
The regional office of the Korea Workers' Compensation and Welfare Service investigates the claim, gathers medical records and workplace statements, and in disease cases may refer the case to an advisory physician or the Occupational Disease Judgment Committee. The decision is based on the balance of medical and factual evidence submitted, so the quality of documentation the worker or their representative provides matters a great deal.
Standard of proof
The worker does not need to prove causation with scientific certainty; a reasonable probability of a causal link, considering the nature of the work, the timing of symptoms, and medical opinion, is generally sufficient under the courts' interpretation of the Act. This lower standard is especially important in occupational disease cases where medical science cannot always give a definitive answer.
Industrial Accident Compensation Claim | Building the causation case
Because most disputes turn on whether the injury or illness is actually connected to the job, gathering the right kind of evidence early significantly affects the outcome.
Accident cases
For a discrete accident, records that fix the time, place, and circumstances of the incident are most valuable: CCTV footage, colleague statements, incident reports, and the first hospital record describing how the injury occurred. Delay in seeking treatment or inconsistent accounts of the accident are common reasons a claim is questioned.
Occupational disease and overwork cases
For diseases such as musculoskeletal disorders or cardiovascular events linked to overwork, working-hour records, shift schedules, and evidence of workload increase in the weeks before onset are central. Where the average working hours in the 12 weeks before onset are significantly above 52 hours, or increased sharply compared to the prior 12 weeks, the Service's own guidelines treat this as a strong indicator of overwork-related causation.
Work-related mental health claims
Claims involving depression, anxiety disorders, or PTSD linked to workplace bullying, harassment, or a traumatic incident require documentation of the specific stressor and its severity, such as complaint records, messages, or witness statements, together with a psychiatric diagnosis connecting the condition to that stressor.
Industrial Accident Compensation Claim | What happens if the claim is denied
A denial is not the end of the process. Korean law provides a structured appeal route, but each stage has a filing deadline that should not be missed.
Requesting review within the Service
The first step is usually a request for review filed with the Service, which is examined by an internal review committee separate from the original decision-maker. New medical opinions or additional evidence not submitted at the initial stage are often introduced at this point.
Administrative litigation as a further option
If the request for review and further review are unsuccessful, the worker may file an administrative lawsuit seeking revocation of the denial decision in court. This route generally must be pursued within 90 days of learning of the relevant administrative decision, and it allows for more thorough fact-finding, including expert medical testimony, than the administrative review stage.
⚠ Appeal deadlines are strict
A request for review (심사청구) to the Service must generally be filed within 90 days of receiving the denial notice, and further review or reconsideration (재심사청구) before the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Review Committee must be filed within 90 days of the decision on the request for review (산업재해보상보험법 제103조, 제106조). Missing these windows can foreclose the administrative appeal route, though a separate administrative litigation option may still be available within its own deadline.
Industrial Accident Compensation Claim | From injury to benefit payment
See a doctor as soon as possible and make sure the medical record accurately reflects how and when the injury or symptoms occurred, since this record becomes key evidence later.
Consult on which category of accident or disease applies, and collect supporting evidence such as working-hour records, witness statements, and prior medical history relevant to causation.
Submit the application for medical care benefits or other relevant benefits along with supporting documents to the regional office having jurisdiction over the workplace.
The Service investigates, may request additional documents or a medical advisory opinion, and issues a decision on recognition; disease cases typically take longer than accident cases.
If the claim is denied, file a request for review within the statutory deadline, and pursue further review or administrative litigation if necessary.
Once recognized, benefits such as medical care, temporary disability compensation, or permanent disability compensation are paid according to the assessed degree of injury, and further applications may be needed as the condition changes.
Industrial Accident Compensation Claim | How fees are typically structured
Most firms offer an initial review of the medical records and circumstances to assess whether the case has a reasonable basis for a claim or appeal before any fee arrangement is finalized.
A retainer fee may be charged for handling the application, the request for review, or the administrative litigation, calculated based on the complexity of the case and the stage at which representation begins.
Some engagements include a fee tied to the benefits ultimately recognized or the outcome of the appeal, agreed upon separately from the retainer and set out clearly in the fee agreement.
Obtaining a supplementary medical opinion, an occupational medicine review, or expert testimony for litigation may involve separate actual costs, which are billed as incurred.
※ Costs vary depending on case complexity and specific circumstances; exact fees will be provided during consultation. No specific outcome is guaranteed.
Industrial Accident Compensation Claim | Self-Check Before You Apply
1️⃣ Is this likely to qualify as an industrial accident?
- Did the injury or illness occur while performing job duties or during a normal commute?
- If it is a disease, can you point to a specific workplace exposure or workload pattern that caused it?
- Was there a period of significantly increased working hours or workload before the onset of symptoms?
- Do your medical records already describe how the injury or illness relates to your work?
2️⃣ Evidence checklist for accident cases
- Do you have CCTV footage, photos, or an incident report from the time of the accident?
- Are there co-workers who witnessed the accident and are willing to provide a statement?
- Does the first hospital record describe the cause of injury consistently with what actually happened?
- Was there a significant delay between the accident and your first medical visit that needs to be explained?
3️⃣ Evidence checklist for occupational disease or overwork claims
- Do you have access to your working-hour records for the past several months?
- Has your workload or schedule changed noticeably in the weeks before symptoms appeared?
- Have you seen a specialist who can offer an opinion linking your condition to your work?
- Are there records of workplace stressors, such as harassment complaints or messages, relevant to a mental health claim?
4️⃣ If your claim was already denied
- Do you know the exact date you received the denial notice?
- Are you still within the 90-day period to file a request for review?
- Do you have new medical evidence that was not submitted with the original application?
- Have you considered whether administrative litigation may be needed if the review is also denied?
Frequently Asked Questions
Official References
개인정보처리방침
제 1 조 수집하는 개인정보의 항목, 목적, 방법
제 2 조 개인정보의 처리 및 보유기간
제 3 조 개인정보의 제3자 제공
제 4 조 개인정보 처리업무의 위탁
제 5 조 정보주체의 권리·의무 및 그 행사방법
제 6 조 개인정보의 파기
제 7 조 의견수렴 및 불만처리
제 8 조 개인정보 처리방침의 변경
제 9 조 개인정보의 안전성 확보 조치
제 1 조 (수집하는 개인정보의 항목, 목적, 방법)
① 게시판 글 작성 시 필수 항목에 대한 수집목적은 ‘별도의 구체적 상담을 위하여’이며 수집항목은 ‘이름, 이메일, 연락처’입니다.
② 전항 외에 고객의 서비스 이용 과정이나 요청 사항 처리 과정에서 ‘IP주소, 접속로그, 단말기 및 환경정보, 서비스 이용기록, 쿠키’와 같은 정보들이 자동으로 수집 및 저장될 수 있으며, 이 때의 수집목적은 ‘사용자 홈페이지 이용, 사이트 이용에 대한 문의 민원 등 고객 고충 처리’입니다.
③ 사무소는 ‘홈페이지 고객 문의/고충 처리 시 전화 또는 인터넷을 통한 상담’과 같은 방법으로 개인정보를 수집합니다
제 2 조 (개인정보의 처리 및 보유기간)
관계법령의 규정에 따라 개인정보를 보존하여야 하는 의무가 있는 경우가 아닌 한, 정보주체의 개인정보는 원칙적으로 해당 개인정보의 처리목적이 달성될 때까지 보유 및 이용되며, 그 목적이 달성되면 지체 없이 파기됩니다.
제 3 조 (개인정보의 제3자 제공)
사무소는 정보주체의 개인정보를 본 처리방침에서 명시한 목적에 한해서만 처리하며 정보주체의 사전동의가 있는 경우 또는 개인정보보호법 등 관계법령의 규정에 의거한 경우에만 개인정보를 제3자에게 제공합니다. 사무소는 현재 개인정보를 제3자에게 제공하지 않고 있습니다.
제 4 조 (개인정보 처리업무의 위탁)
사무소는 현재 귀하의 개인정보 보호를 위해 귀하의 개인정보를 직접 취급 관리하고 있습니다. 단, 향후 보다 전문적인 서비스를 제공하기 위하여 제3의 전문기관에 귀하의 정보를 위탁할 필요가 있다고 판단되는 경우, 귀하의 사전 동의 하에 개인정보에 대한 취급을 위탁할 수 있습니다.
제 5 조 (정보주체의 권리·의무 및 그 행사방법)
① 정보주체는 개인정보보호법 등 관계법령이 정하는 바에 따라 사무소에 대해 개인정보의 열람, 정정 및 삭제, 처리정지 요구 등 개인정보 보호 관련 권리를 행사할 수 있습니다.
② 제1항에 따른 권리행사는 정보주체의 법정대리인이나 위임을 받은 사람을 통해서도 할 수 있습니다. 다만, 이 경우에는 개인정보보호법 시행규칙에 따른 위임장을 사무소에 제출하여야 합니다.
③ 사무소는 정보주체의 권리행사에 대하여 개인정보보호법 등 관계법령이 정하는 바에 따라 지체 없이 조치하겠습니다.
제 6 조 (개인정보의 파기)
① 사무소는 원칙적으로 개인정보의 처리목적이 달성된 경우 등 그 개인정보가 불필요하게 되었을 때에는 지체 없이 해당 개인정보를 파기합니다.
② 사무소가 관계법령의 규정에 따라 개인정보를 파기하지 아니하고 보존하여야 하는 경우에는 해당 개인정보 또는 개인정보파일을 다른 개인정보와 분리해서 저장·관리 합니다.
③ 사무소는 파기사유가 발생한 개인정보를 선정하여 개인정보 보호책임자의 승인을 받아 해당 개인정보를 파기합니다.
④ 사무소는 파기하여야 할 개인정보가 전자적 파일 형태인 경우 복원이 불가능한 방법으로 영구 삭제하며, 이외의 기록물, 인쇄물, 서면, 그 밖의 기록매체인 경우 파쇄 또는 소각합니다.
제 7 조 (의견수렴 및 불만처리)
정보주체는 개인정보 보호 관련 문의, 불만처리, 피해구제 등에 관한 사항을 아래 개인정보 보호책임자 또는 담당부서에 문의하실 수 있습니다. 사무소는 정보주체의 문의에 대하여 신속하고 충분한 답변을 드릴 것입니다.
개인정보 보호 책임자 : 변호사
연락처 : 02.
제 8 조 (개인정보 처리방침의 변경)
사무소의 개인정보 처리방침은 관련 법령, 지침 및 사무소 내부규정에 따라 변경될 수 있으며, 개인정보 처리방침이 변경되는 경우 관련 법령이 정하는 방법에 따라 공개합니다.
제 9 조 (개인정보의 안전성 확보 조치)
사무소는 개인정보의 안전성 확보를 위해 다음과 같은 조치를 취하고 있습니다.
관리적 조치 : 내부관리계획의 수립 및 시행, 구성원에 대한 정기적인 개인정보 보호교육 등
기술적 조치 : 개인정보처리시스템 등의 접근권한 관리, 접근통제시스템 설치, 고유식별정보 등의 암호화, 보안프로그램의 설치 등
물리적 조치 : 전산실, 자료보관실 등 개인정보 보관장소에 대한 접근통제