Listed Company Advisory Lawyer | Keeping disclosure, governance, and shareholder relations on the right side of the line
Summary
Listed company advisory covers the ongoing legal obligations that attach specifically to companies traded on KOSPI or KOSDAQ — timely disclosure, board and general shareholder meeting procedures, related-party transaction approval, and capital markets transactions such as rights offerings or convertible bond issuances. A single missed disclosure deadline or a defective board resolution can trigger sanctions from the Korea Exchange or the Financial Services Commission, and in serious cases criminal liability under the Financial Investment Services and Capital Markets Act (자본시장과 금융투자업에 관한 법률). Because these rules change frequently and interact with the Commercial Act (상법) governance provisions, most listed companies retain counsel for continuous review rather than one-off consultations.
Administrative · CorporateRelated law: Financial Investment Services and Capital Markets ActRelated law: Commercial ActKOSPI / KOSDAQ compliance
Listed Company Advisory | Timely disclosure and fair disclosure obligations
Disclosure is the area where listed companies most often incur sanctions, usually not from bad faith but from failing to recognize that an internal decision has already triggered a public disclosure duty.
What triggers a timely disclosure duty
Once a company's board or management resolves on a matter listed in the Korea Exchange disclosure regulations — a large-scale investment, a merger, a change of the largest shareholder, or a significant contract — the disclosure clock starts running from the moment the decision is made, not from when a press release goes out. Companies frequently underestimate how early that trigger point falls, especially where a matter is discussed informally before a formal board resolution.
Ad hoc disclosure vs. fair disclosure
Ad hoc (timely) disclosure obligations apply to material corporate events regardless of who becomes aware of them, while fair disclosure rules govern selective communication of undisclosed material information to analysts, institutional investors, or media (자본시장과 금융투자업에 관한 법률 제391조 및 한국거래소 공시규정). An advisory review typically checks both the substance of what is being disclosed and the timing and channel used to disclose it.
Consequences of a disclosure violation
Violations can result in a public unfaithful disclosure designation, corrective disclosure requirements, fines imposed by the Exchange, or in more serious cases referral for investigation on suspected market manipulation or unfair trading. A pattern of violations can also affect the company's management issue designation status, which has knock-on effects for investor relations.
Listed Company Advisory | Board and general shareholder meeting procedure
The Commercial Act (상법) sets out detailed procedural requirements for convening board and shareholder meetings, and listed companies face additional layers under the Financial Investment Services and Capital Markets Act, particularly around electronic voting and shareholder proposal rights.
Notice periods and convening defects
A general shareholders' meeting must generally be convened with at least two weeks' prior notice to shareholders (상법 제363조), and failure to meet notice or agenda disclosure requirements can expose a resolution to challenge through a lawsuit to revoke a shareholders' meeting resolution. Listed companies also need to reconcile these notice periods with electronic disclosure filing deadlines that run on a separate clock.
Shareholder proposals and activist engagement
Minority shareholders holding the statutory minimum shareholding percentage can request that specific agenda items be placed on the shareholders' meeting agenda (상법 제363조의2), and listed companies increasingly need a process for evaluating and responding to these proposals, including from activist investors, within statutory deadlines.
Independent director and audit committee requirements
Companies above certain asset thresholds are required to appoint outside directors and, in many cases, form an audit committee with independent director majority under the Commercial Act. Advisory review at this stage often focuses on director independence criteria and whether committee composition still meets statutory requirements after personnel changes.
Listed Company Advisory | Related-party transactions and internal transaction approval
Transactions between a listed company and its largest shareholder, affiliates, or executives carry a heightened approval and disclosure burden precisely because of the conflict-of-interest risk they present to minority shareholders.
Board approval threshold for related-party deals
Transactions with the largest shareholder or specially related persons above a certain size generally require prior board approval, and transactions exceeding a higher threshold require approval at the general shareholders' meeting (상법 제542조의9). Structuring a transaction to fit within, rather than around, these thresholds is a recurring point of advisory review.
Disclosure of related-party transactions
Beyond internal approval, related-party transactions above the relevant size must also be separately disclosed to the market, and the disclosure content is scrutinized for whether the terms were on an arm's-length basis. Inadequate disclosure here is a common source of Exchange inquiries even when the underlying transaction itself was legitimate.
Listed Company Advisory | Capital markets transactions: rights offerings, CBs, and M&A disclosure
Raising capital or pursuing M&A as a listed company means the transaction itself becomes public information subject to registration and disclosure requirements well before closing.
Securities registration statements
A public offering or rights offering above the statutory threshold generally requires filing a securities registration statement with the Financial Services Commission before the offering can proceed (자본시장과 금융투자업에 관한 법률 제119조), and the statement must be reviewed for accuracy since misstatements can give rise to investor liability claims.
Convertible and exchangeable bond issuance
Issuance of convertible bonds or exchangeable bonds by a listed company triggers both disclosure obligations and, where the issuance is to a specific third party rather than existing shareholders, additional scrutiny of whether the pricing and allottee selection could dilute or disadvantage existing shareholders.
M&A announcement timing
Merger and acquisition discussions for a listed company often need to be disclosed once they reach a level of concreteness well before signing, and coordinating confidentiality during negotiation with the disclosure duty is one of the more delicate judgment calls in listed company advisory work.
Listed Company Advisory | From initial review to ongoing retainer
1
Initial compliance review We review the company's existing disclosure history, board minutes, and governance structure to identify any open or recurring compliance gaps before setting up an ongoing arrangement.
2
Matter-by-matter legal opinions For specific transactions — a board resolution, a related-party contract, a securities issuance — we provide a written opinion on required approvals, disclosure timing, and drafting of the disclosure content itself.
3
Board and shareholder meeting support We assist with meeting notice drafting, agenda review, and where a resolution is later challenged, defending or evaluating the validity of the resolution.
4
Regulatory inquiry response Where the Korea Exchange or Financial Services Commission raises an inquiry about a disclosure or transaction, we prepare the company's response and, if needed, represent the company in any resulting administrative proceeding.
5
Ongoing retainer and monitoring Most listed companies move to a continuous retainer so that new disclosure triggers and governance questions can be flagged and reviewed before, rather than after, a decision is made public.
Listed Company Advisory | How advisory fees are set
Retainer fee Ongoing advisory relationships are typically structured as a monthly or quarterly retainer, with the fee scaled to the volume of board matters, disclosure filings, and transactions the company expects to handle in a given period.
Per-matter opinion fee For a single transaction or a one-off legal opinion (for example, on whether a specific deal requires shareholder approval), fees are set based on the complexity and time required for that particular matter rather than the retainer rate.
Transaction-based fee For capital markets transactions such as a rights offering or bond issuance, fees may be tied to the scale and structure of the transaction, reflecting the additional drafting and regulatory filing work involved.
Regulatory response fee Responding to an Exchange or FSC inquiry or preparing for a possible sanction proceeding is generally billed separately from the retainer, given the additional fact investigation and drafting involved.
※ Costs vary depending on case complexity and specific circumstances; exact fees will be provided during consultation. No specific outcome is guaranteed.
Listed Company Advisory | Self-Check for Listed Companies
1️⃣ Disclosure Readiness
Does your company have a documented process for identifying when an internal decision triggers a timely disclosure duty?
Has your IR or legal team reviewed fair disclosure rules before any analyst or investor meeting?
Have you had a disclosure corrected or flagged as unfaithful in the past two years?
2️⃣ Board & Shareholder Meeting Procedure
Was the most recent shareholders' meeting notice sent within the statutory minimum period?
Has a shareholder proposal ever been received, and was it evaluated against statutory deadlines?
Does your audit committee still meet the independent director composition requirement after recent personnel changes?
3️⃣ Related-Party Transactions
Has any transaction with the largest shareholder or an affiliate exceeded the board approval threshold without prior board review?
Was the pricing of a recent related-party transaction documented on an arm's-length basis?
Has a related-party transaction been separately disclosed to the market where required?
4️⃣ Capital Markets Transactions
If you are planning a rights offering or bond issuance, has a securities registration statement been prepared and reviewed?
For a third-party convertible bond issuance, has the pricing and allottee selection been reviewed for potential dilution concerns?
If M&A discussions are underway, do you have a plan for when disclosure becomes required relative to signing?
Frequently Asked Questions
Q. When exactly does a timely disclosure obligation arise — at the board resolution or when the deal closes?
A. In most cases, the disclosure duty is triggered by the board's or management's decision itself, not by closing. Once a matter listed under the Exchange disclosure regulations is resolved internally, the disclosure period generally begins running from that point (자본시장과 금융투자업에 관한 법률 및 한국거래소 공시규정).
Q. What happens if our company misses a disclosure deadline?
A. Consequences range from a formal unfaithful disclosure designation and corrective disclosure request to fines from the Exchange. Repeated or serious violations can also affect a company's management issue designation status and, in cases involving deliberate concealment, may raise exposure under market manipulation provisions.
Q. Do we need shareholder approval for every transaction with our largest shareholder?
A. No. Board approval is generally required above a certain transaction size with the largest shareholder or specially related persons, and general shareholders' meeting approval is required only above a higher threshold (상법 제542조의9). The applicable threshold depends on the company's asset size and the transaction amount.
Q. Can a shareholder challenge a board resolution or shareholders' meeting resolution after the fact?
A. Yes. Defects in convening procedure, such as insufficient notice period or agenda disclosure, can be grounds for a lawsuit to revoke a shareholders' meeting resolution. This is why advisory review of meeting procedure before the meeting is usually far more effective than defending a challenge afterward.
Q. What is the difference between ad hoc disclosure and fair disclosure?
A. Ad hoc disclosure covers material corporate events that must be disclosed to the market generally, regardless of audience. Fair disclosure specifically governs situations where undisclosed material information is shared selectively with analysts, institutional investors, or media before it is made public.
Q. Do we need outside directors and an audit committee?
A. Companies above certain statutory asset thresholds are required to appoint outside directors and, in many cases, form an audit committee with a majority of independent directors under the Commercial Act. Whether your company currently meets the threshold, and whether recent director changes affect committee composition, should be reviewed periodically rather than only at listing.
Q. How early do we need to disclose an M&A deal we're negotiating?
A. Disclosure is typically required once the matter reaches a sufficiently concrete stage — for example, when a board resolution is made or a binding agreement is close — even if the deal has not yet closed. Managing confidentiality during negotiation while meeting this obligation is a common point of advisory consultation.
Q. What is a securities registration statement and when is it required?
A. It is a filing made to the Financial Services Commission before a public offering or rights offering above the statutory threshold amount can proceed, disclosing the terms of the offering and relevant company information (자본시장과 금융투자업에 관한 법률 제119조). Errors or omissions in the statement can expose the company and its officers to investor claims.
Q. Is a third-party convertible bond issuance riskier than a rights offering to existing shareholders?
A. It carries additional scrutiny because pricing and allottee selection in a third-party issuance can potentially dilute or disadvantage existing shareholders. Regulators and courts pay particular attention to whether the issuance price and the choice of allottee were reasonably justified.
Q. Should a listed company retain outside counsel on an ongoing basis rather than case by case?
A. Many listed companies find that disclosure and governance obligations recur frequently enough that reviewing each board decision or transaction as it arises, under a continuous retainer, catches issues before a public filing is made rather than after a violation has already occurred. Whether a one-off consultation or an ongoing retainer fits your company depends on the frequency of board and capital markets activity.
Q. What should we do if the Korea Exchange sends an inquiry about one of our disclosures?
A. The response should be prepared carefully, since an inadequate or inconsistent response can escalate the matter toward a formal sanction proceeding. It is generally advisable to have counsel review the inquiry and draft the response rather than replying directly from the IR team without legal review.
법무법인 프런티어(이하 “사무소”)는 개인정보보호법에 따라 정보주체의 개인정보 및 권익을 보호하고 개인정보와 관련된 정보주체의 고충을 신속하고 원활하게 처리하기 위하여 본 개인정보 처리방침을 수립·공개합니다.
제 1 조 수집하는 개인정보의 항목, 목적, 방법
제 2 조 개인정보의 처리 및 보유기간
제 3 조 개인정보의 제3자 제공
제 4 조 개인정보 처리업무의 위탁
제 5 조 정보주체의 권리·의무 및 그 행사방법
제 6 조 개인정보의 파기
제 7 조 의견수렴 및 불만처리
제 8 조 개인정보 처리방침의 변경
제 9 조 개인정보의 안전성 확보 조치
제 1 조 (수집하는 개인정보의 항목, 목적, 방법)
① 게시판 글 작성 시 필수 항목에 대한 수집목적은 ‘별도의 구체적 상담을 위하여’이며 수집항목은 ‘이름, 이메일, 연락처’입니다.
② 전항 외에 고객의 서비스 이용 과정이나 요청 사항 처리 과정에서 ‘IP주소, 접속로그, 단말기 및 환경정보, 서비스 이용기록, 쿠키’와 같은 정보들이 자동으로 수집 및 저장될 수 있으며, 이 때의 수집목적은 ‘사용자 홈페이지 이용, 사이트 이용에 대한 문의 민원 등 고객 고충 처리’입니다.
③ 사무소는 ‘홈페이지 고객 문의/고충 처리 시 전화 또는 인터넷을 통한 상담’과 같은 방법으로 개인정보를 수집합니다
제 2 조 (개인정보의 처리 및 보유기간)
관계법령의 규정에 따라 개인정보를 보존하여야 하는 의무가 있는 경우가 아닌 한, 정보주체의 개인정보는 원칙적으로 해당 개인정보의 처리목적이 달성될 때까지 보유 및 이용되며, 그 목적이 달성되면 지체 없이 파기됩니다.
제 3 조 (개인정보의 제3자 제공)
사무소는 정보주체의 개인정보를 본 처리방침에서 명시한 목적에 한해서만 처리하며 정보주체의 사전동의가 있는 경우 또는 개인정보보호법 등 관계법령의 규정에 의거한 경우에만 개인정보를 제3자에게 제공합니다. 사무소는 현재 개인정보를 제3자에게 제공하지 않고 있습니다.
제 4 조 (개인정보 처리업무의 위탁)
사무소는 현재 귀하의 개인정보 보호를 위해 귀하의 개인정보를 직접 취급 관리하고 있습니다. 단, 향후 보다 전문적인 서비스를 제공하기 위하여 제3의 전문기관에 귀하의 정보를 위탁할 필요가 있다고 판단되는 경우, 귀하의 사전 동의 하에 개인정보에 대한 취급을 위탁할 수 있습니다.
제 5 조 (정보주체의 권리·의무 및 그 행사방법)
① 정보주체는 개인정보보호법 등 관계법령이 정하는 바에 따라 사무소에 대해 개인정보의 열람, 정정 및 삭제, 처리정지 요구 등 개인정보 보호 관련 권리를 행사할 수 있습니다.
② 제1항에 따른 권리행사는 정보주체의 법정대리인이나 위임을 받은 사람을 통해서도 할 수 있습니다. 다만, 이 경우에는 개인정보보호법 시행규칙에 따른 위임장을 사무소에 제출하여야 합니다.
③ 사무소는 정보주체의 권리행사에 대하여 개인정보보호법 등 관계법령이 정하는 바에 따라 지체 없이 조치하겠습니다.
제 6 조 (개인정보의 파기)
① 사무소는 원칙적으로 개인정보의 처리목적이 달성된 경우 등 그 개인정보가 불필요하게 되었을 때에는 지체 없이 해당 개인정보를 파기합니다.
② 사무소가 관계법령의 규정에 따라 개인정보를 파기하지 아니하고 보존하여야 하는 경우에는 해당 개인정보 또는 개인정보파일을 다른 개인정보와 분리해서 저장·관리 합니다.
③ 사무소는 파기사유가 발생한 개인정보를 선정하여 개인정보 보호책임자의 승인을 받아 해당 개인정보를 파기합니다.
④ 사무소는 파기하여야 할 개인정보가 전자적 파일 형태인 경우 복원이 불가능한 방법으로 영구 삭제하며, 이외의 기록물, 인쇄물, 서면, 그 밖의 기록매체인 경우 파쇄 또는 소각합니다.
제 7 조 (의견수렴 및 불만처리)
정보주체는 개인정보 보호 관련 문의, 불만처리, 피해구제 등에 관한 사항을 아래 개인정보 보호책임자 또는 담당부서에 문의하실 수 있습니다. 사무소는 정보주체의 문의에 대하여 신속하고 충분한 답변을 드릴 것입니다.
개인정보 보호 책임자 : 변호사
연락처 : 02.
제 8 조 (개인정보 처리방침의 변경)
사무소의 개인정보 처리방침은 관련 법령, 지침 및 사무소 내부규정에 따라 변경될 수 있으며, 개인정보 처리방침이 변경되는 경우 관련 법령이 정하는 방법에 따라 공개합니다.
제 9 조 (개인정보의 안전성 확보 조치)
사무소는 개인정보의 안전성 확보를 위해 다음과 같은 조치를 취하고 있습니다.
관리적 조치 : 내부관리계획의 수립 및 시행, 구성원에 대한 정기적인 개인정보 보호교육 등
기술적 조치 : 개인정보처리시스템 등의 접근권한 관리, 접근통제시스템 설치, 고유식별정보 등의 암호화, 보안프로그램의 설치 등
물리적 조치 : 전산실, 자료보관실 등 개인정보 보관장소에 대한 접근통제