법무법인 프런티어
De Facto Marriage Dissolution Lawyer
De Facto Marriage Dissolution Lawyer | What you can claim when an unregistered relationship ends
A de facto marriage (사실혼) is a relationship where two people live together with the intention and substance of marriage, but never completed the marriage registration required under Korean law (민법 제812조). Because there is no registered marriage, there is no "divorce" in the legal sense \u2014 instead the relationship is "dissolved" (사실혼 해소), and Korean courts have extended many divorce-related protections to this situation by analogy, including property division and consolation money for unjustified unilateral termination. Whether you qualify at all turns heavily on evidence: cohabitation records, family recognition, joint finances, and how the relationship ended.
De Facto Marriage Dissolution | What makes a relationship a "de facto marriage" in the eyes of the court
Korean law does not define de facto marriage in a single statute; it is a status recognized by case law that borrows selected effects of registered marriage under the Civil Act (민법). Courts look at substance over form, but the following elements matter most in practice.
Both partners must have genuinely intended to be husband and wife, not just dating or living together casually. Courts infer this from how the couple presented themselves to family, friends, and institutions — wedding ceremonies, joint greeting cards, or introducing each other as spouse are commonly cited evidence.
There must be an actual shared household — cohabitation, shared finances, mutual support — that objectively resembles a marriage. A relationship that never progressed beyond occasional overnight stays is unlikely to qualify even if both sides call it serious.
If one party was still legally married to someone else during the relationship, the later relationship is generally treated as an adulterous affair rather than a de facto marriage, which changes what remedies are available (민법 제810조 관련 중혼 금지 법리).
Courts distinguish between couples who simply postponed or skipped registration despite being free to marry, and couples who could never have registered (e.g., where a formal marriage was legally barred). This distinction can affect the strength of a de facto marriage claim.
What a de facto marriage is not
Casual cohabitation, a short-term relationship, or a couple still in the dating/engagement stage without shared married life generally does not meet the standard. Because there is no registration to point to, the burden of proving these elements existed falls on the person asserting the de facto marriage, which is why documentary evidence matters so much in these cases.
De Facto Marriage Dissolution | Property division, financial support, and consolation money
Once a de facto marriage is recognized, courts have applied several divorce-related remedies by analogy, even though the underlying statutes were written for registered marriages.
Division of property acquired together
Property jointly accumulated during the relationship through mutual cooperation — a home, savings, a small business — can be divided upon dissolution, applying the same underlying logic as division of marital property between registered spouses (민법 제839조의2 유추적용). Property one partner owned before the relationship began, or received solely as a personal gift or inheritance, is typically treated as separate property and excluded.
Consolation money when termination is unjustified
If one partner unilaterally and without justifiable reason ends the relationship, or is otherwise responsible for its breakdown (through infidelity, violence, or abandonment), the other partner may claim consolation money for emotional distress, similar to a divorce consolation money claim. The amount depends on the length of the relationship, the reason for the breakdown, and each side's conduct.
No automatic inheritance or spousal status
A surviving de facto partner does not automatically inherit from the deceased partner the way a registered spouse would, because inheritance rights under the Civil Act are tied to registered marital status. This is one of the sharpest practical differences between a de facto marriage and a registered one, and it often surprises long-term partners who assumed they had the same rights as a legal spouse.
Children born during the relationship
A child born to an unmarried couple is legally the mother's child unless the father completes a formal acknowledgment of paternity (인지), even if both parents intended to raise the child together as a family. This affects child support claims, custody arrangements, and the child's surname and family registry entry, and is frequently a separate legal step from the dissolution itself.
De Facto Marriage Dissolution | How the relationship actually ends, and what evidence matters
Unlike a registered marriage, there is no court filing required simply to end a de facto marriage — either partner can walk away. Disputes arise when one side denies the relationship ever reached the legal standard, or disputes who is at fault for the breakdown.
Proving the relationship existed at all
Because there is no marriage certificate, the person claiming a de facto marriage typically gathers evidence such as a resident registration showing a shared address, joint bank accounts or shared household expenses, wedding photos or ceremony records, text messages, and statements from family or friends who witnessed the relationship.
Establishing fault for the breakdown
Just as with divorce, fault matters for consolation money — evidence of an affair, domestic violence, or abandonment strengthens a claim, while a mutual, no-fault separation may leave only the property division claim available.
Filing a claim if the other side disputes the relationship's status
When the other party denies that a de facto marriage ever existed — often to avoid property division or consolation money — the claimant generally needs to bring a civil lawsuit asking the court to first confirm the existence of the de facto marriage before ruling on the financial claims that flow from it.
De Facto Marriage Dissolution | From initial consultation to resolution
We review the timeline of the relationship, cohabitation records, financial documents, and any communications to assess whether the relationship is likely to meet the de facto marriage standard and to identify what evidence gaps need to be filled.
Many de facto marriage disputes can be resolved through direct negotiation between the parties or family court mediation, particularly where both sides agree the relationship existed and are disputing only the division of assets.
If the other side denies the relationship existed, or the parties cannot agree on property division or consolation money, we file the appropriate civil claim — which may include a request to confirm the existence of the de facto marriage as a preliminary matter.
The court examines documentary evidence and witness statements regarding cohabitation, shared finances, and the circumstances of the breakdown, and both sides present arguments on fault and asset valuation.
The case concludes either through a court-mediated settlement or a judgment determining whether a de facto marriage existed and, if so, how property should be divided and whether consolation money is owed.
De Facto Marriage Dissolution | How legal fees are structured
Calculated based on the complexity of proving the existence of the de facto marriage, the value of the property in dispute, and whether the case proceeds through negotiation only or requires full litigation.
If the case involves a monetary claim such as property division or consolation money, a portion of the fee may be structured as a percentage of the amount actually recovered, agreed upon in advance.
If separate issues arise — such as a paternity acknowledgment claim for a child born during the relationship, or a related criminal complaint — these are typically billed as separate matters from the core dissolution case.
Court filing fees, service of process costs, and expenses for evidence such as expert appraisal of jointly held property are billed separately from the legal fee itself.
※ Costs vary depending on case complexity and specific circumstances; exact fees will be provided during consultation. No specific outcome is guaranteed.
De Facto Marriage Dissolution | Self-Check Before You Contact a Lawyer
1️⃣ Did your relationship reach the level of a de facto marriage?
- Did you and your partner live together at the same address for a meaningful period?
- Did you hold a wedding ceremony, or introduce each other as husband and wife to family and friends?
- Did you share household finances, such as a joint account or shared living expenses?
- Was either of you legally married to someone else at any point during the relationship?
2️⃣ What evidence do you currently have?
- Do you have resident registration records showing a shared address?
- Do you have photos, messages, or documents referring to each other as spouse?
- Do you have financial records showing joint contributions to property or savings?
- Would family members or friends be willing to confirm the relationship if needed?
3️⃣ What are you seeking from the dissolution?
- Are you seeking a division of property acquired during the relationship?
- Do you believe the other party is at fault for the breakdown (affair, violence, abandonment)?
- Is there a child born during the relationship whose paternity or custody needs to be addressed?
- Has the other party already disposed of or hidden shared assets?
4️⃣ Is the other side likely to dispute the relationship's status?
- Has the other party denied that the relationship was ever a marriage-like relationship?
- Is there a risk the other party will argue this was just cohabitation or dating?
- Do you have a consistent, documented timeline of when the relationship began and ended?
Frequently Asked Questions
Official References
개인정보처리방침
제 1 조 수집하는 개인정보의 항목, 목적, 방법
제 2 조 개인정보의 처리 및 보유기간
제 3 조 개인정보의 제3자 제공
제 4 조 개인정보 처리업무의 위탁
제 5 조 정보주체의 권리·의무 및 그 행사방법
제 6 조 개인정보의 파기
제 7 조 의견수렴 및 불만처리
제 8 조 개인정보 처리방침의 변경
제 9 조 개인정보의 안전성 확보 조치
제 1 조 (수집하는 개인정보의 항목, 목적, 방법)
① 게시판 글 작성 시 필수 항목에 대한 수집목적은 ‘별도의 구체적 상담을 위하여’이며 수집항목은 ‘이름, 이메일, 연락처’입니다.
② 전항 외에 고객의 서비스 이용 과정이나 요청 사항 처리 과정에서 ‘IP주소, 접속로그, 단말기 및 환경정보, 서비스 이용기록, 쿠키’와 같은 정보들이 자동으로 수집 및 저장될 수 있으며, 이 때의 수집목적은 ‘사용자 홈페이지 이용, 사이트 이용에 대한 문의 민원 등 고객 고충 처리’입니다.
③ 사무소는 ‘홈페이지 고객 문의/고충 처리 시 전화 또는 인터넷을 통한 상담’과 같은 방법으로 개인정보를 수집합니다
제 2 조 (개인정보의 처리 및 보유기간)
관계법령의 규정에 따라 개인정보를 보존하여야 하는 의무가 있는 경우가 아닌 한, 정보주체의 개인정보는 원칙적으로 해당 개인정보의 처리목적이 달성될 때까지 보유 및 이용되며, 그 목적이 달성되면 지체 없이 파기됩니다.
제 3 조 (개인정보의 제3자 제공)
사무소는 정보주체의 개인정보를 본 처리방침에서 명시한 목적에 한해서만 처리하며 정보주체의 사전동의가 있는 경우 또는 개인정보보호법 등 관계법령의 규정에 의거한 경우에만 개인정보를 제3자에게 제공합니다. 사무소는 현재 개인정보를 제3자에게 제공하지 않고 있습니다.
제 4 조 (개인정보 처리업무의 위탁)
사무소는 현재 귀하의 개인정보 보호를 위해 귀하의 개인정보를 직접 취급 관리하고 있습니다. 단, 향후 보다 전문적인 서비스를 제공하기 위하여 제3의 전문기관에 귀하의 정보를 위탁할 필요가 있다고 판단되는 경우, 귀하의 사전 동의 하에 개인정보에 대한 취급을 위탁할 수 있습니다.
제 5 조 (정보주체의 권리·의무 및 그 행사방법)
① 정보주체는 개인정보보호법 등 관계법령이 정하는 바에 따라 사무소에 대해 개인정보의 열람, 정정 및 삭제, 처리정지 요구 등 개인정보 보호 관련 권리를 행사할 수 있습니다.
② 제1항에 따른 권리행사는 정보주체의 법정대리인이나 위임을 받은 사람을 통해서도 할 수 있습니다. 다만, 이 경우에는 개인정보보호법 시행규칙에 따른 위임장을 사무소에 제출하여야 합니다.
③ 사무소는 정보주체의 권리행사에 대하여 개인정보보호법 등 관계법령이 정하는 바에 따라 지체 없이 조치하겠습니다.
제 6 조 (개인정보의 파기)
① 사무소는 원칙적으로 개인정보의 처리목적이 달성된 경우 등 그 개인정보가 불필요하게 되었을 때에는 지체 없이 해당 개인정보를 파기합니다.
② 사무소가 관계법령의 규정에 따라 개인정보를 파기하지 아니하고 보존하여야 하는 경우에는 해당 개인정보 또는 개인정보파일을 다른 개인정보와 분리해서 저장·관리 합니다.
③ 사무소는 파기사유가 발생한 개인정보를 선정하여 개인정보 보호책임자의 승인을 받아 해당 개인정보를 파기합니다.
④ 사무소는 파기하여야 할 개인정보가 전자적 파일 형태인 경우 복원이 불가능한 방법으로 영구 삭제하며, 이외의 기록물, 인쇄물, 서면, 그 밖의 기록매체인 경우 파쇄 또는 소각합니다.
제 7 조 (의견수렴 및 불만처리)
정보주체는 개인정보 보호 관련 문의, 불만처리, 피해구제 등에 관한 사항을 아래 개인정보 보호책임자 또는 담당부서에 문의하실 수 있습니다. 사무소는 정보주체의 문의에 대하여 신속하고 충분한 답변을 드릴 것입니다.
개인정보 보호 책임자 : 변호사
연락처 : 02.
제 8 조 (개인정보 처리방침의 변경)
사무소의 개인정보 처리방침은 관련 법령, 지침 및 사무소 내부규정에 따라 변경될 수 있으며, 개인정보 처리방침이 변경되는 경우 관련 법령이 정하는 방법에 따라 공개합니다.
제 9 조 (개인정보의 안전성 확보 조치)
사무소는 개인정보의 안전성 확보를 위해 다음과 같은 조치를 취하고 있습니다.
관리적 조치 : 내부관리계획의 수립 및 시행, 구성원에 대한 정기적인 개인정보 보호교육 등
기술적 조치 : 개인정보처리시스템 등의 접근권한 관리, 접근통제시스템 설치, 고유식별정보 등의 암호화, 보안프로그램의 설치 등
물리적 조치 : 전산실, 자료보관실 등 개인정보 보관장소에 대한 접근통제