법무법인 프런티어
Nonexistence of Biological Parent-Child Relationship Lawyer
Nonexistence of Biological Parent-Child Relationship Lawyer | Correcting a family registry entry that doesn't match biological reality
A lawsuit for nonexistence of parent-child relationship (친생자관계부존재확인의 소) seeks a court declaration that a parent-child relationship entered on the family register does not actually exist - typically because a child was falsely reported as the birth child of a couple, or a presumption of paternity under the Civil Act does not match biological fact. Because the relationship as recorded has legal effects on inheritance, support obligations, and family registration, resolving the mismatch usually requires a court judgment rather than a simple administrative correction. The case almost always turns on genetic testing results and the paper trail of how the birth was originally registered.
Nonexistence of Biological Parent-Child Relationship | When can you file for nonexistence of a parent-child relationship?
Korean law does not let a family registry entry be corrected simply because it is factually wrong; certain conditions and procedural routes need to apply. These are the situations most commonly seen in practice.
This occurs when a child born to someone else is reported to the authorities as if born to the recipient couple, often to informally raise a relative's or another person's child as one's own. Because no biological or valid adoption relationship exists, the registered parent-child tie can be nullified by a court judgment. Courts have long treated such filings, in substance, as void birth reports rather than adoptions.
A child born to a married woman is presumed to be her husband's child under the Civil Act (민법 제844조), but this presumption is not absolute where paternity is genuinely in doubt. Where the underlying biological premise fails - for example the husband was not the biological father and the marriage was already substantially broken down, or the child was conceived outside a period the law recognizes as within the marriage - a nonexistence action, rather than a denial of paternity action, may be the appropriate route.
Where a family register shows a parent-child entry that was supposed to reflect an adoption, but the formal requirements for adoption (consent, court permission for minors, proper reporting) were never actually satisfied, the entry may be challenged as not reflecting any real adoptive or biological relationship (민법 제883조 관련 입양 무효 법리).
If the person whose status is disputed, or the recorded parent, has died, close relatives with a legal interest - such as co-heirs whose inheritance shares are affected - may still bring or continue the action within the statutory period (가사소송법 제28조, 제24조 참조).
Distinguishing this from a denial-of-paternity action
Where a child was born during marriage and the presumption of paternity under 민법 제844조 squarely applies, the correct remedy is usually a denial of paternity action (친생부인의 소) filed within two years of learning the grounds (민법 제847조), not a nonexistence action. Filing the wrong type of action can result in dismissal, so which route applies should be checked carefully before filing.
Nonexistence of Biological Parent-Child Relationship | What actually decides these cases
Nonexistence cases are fact-heavy. The outcome usually depends less on legal argument and more on what the birth report records show and what genetic testing confirms.
Who has standing to sue
Standing is broader than in an ordinary civil suit: the child, the recorded parents, and any third party with a genuine legal interest (such as an heir whose inheritance share would change) can file (가사소송법 제28조, 제26조). This matters because disputes often surface only after the recorded parent's death, when inheritance shares are at stake.
There is no fixed filing deadline in most cases
Unlike a denial of paternity action, which must be filed within two years of learning the grounds (민법 제847조), a nonexistence action generally is not subject to the same short limitation period, because it addresses a relationship that never validly existed in the first place. That said, courts still weigh long delay and reliance interests, particularly where the disputed relationship has stood unchallenged for decades and other family members have relied on it.
Jurisdiction and mandatory mediation
These are family cases handled by the Family Court, and most are first routed through mandatory mediation (조정전치주의, 가사소송법 제50조) before proceeding to trial, though mediation frequently fails to produce agreement given the factual nature of the dispute and moves on to litigation.
Nonexistence of Biological Parent-Child Relationship | Building the evidentiary record
Because the claim ultimately asks the court to find a biological fact, the case is won or lost on documentary and scientific evidence, not on legal theory alone.
Genetic (DNA) testing
A court-ordered or court-referred genetic test comparing the child and the disputed parent is typically the decisive piece of evidence. Where a party refuses to submit to testing without good reason, the court may draw an adverse inference from that refusal in assessing the overall record.
Original birth report and hospital records
Records showing who actually delivered the child - hospital birth records, discharge summaries, or statements from the delivering hospital or midwife - are often central in allo-adoption cases, since they can directly contradict what was written on the birth report submitted to the district office.
Family registry history (제적부, 가족관계증명서)
Requesting the full history of family registry documents, including now-closed registers (제적등본), can reveal inconsistent dates, prior registrations, or amendments that support the claim that the current entry does not reflect an actual birth or adoption.
Nonexistence of Biological Parent-Child Relationship | From consultation to a corrected family register
Review family registry documents (including 제적등본), any existing genetic test results, and the circumstances of the original birth report to determine which type of action fits the facts.
Most cases are first referred to mediation (조정전치주의). If both sides can agree on the facts and consent to the correction, the case may end here with a mediation settlement having the same effect as a final judgment.
If mediation fails, the case proceeds as a formal lawsuit. The court typically orders genetic testing, reviews hospital and registry records, and may hear witness testimony from family members involved in the original birth report.
If the court finds the parent-child relationship does not exist, it issues a judgment declaring nonexistence, which becomes binding once final and is not appealed further (or after the appeal period runs).
With the final judgment, the party reports the outcome to the district office (구청 또는 읍면동 주민센터) within the statutory reporting period, and the family registry is corrected to remove the disputed entry (가족관계등록 등에 관한 법률 관련 신고).
Nonexistence of Biological Parent-Child Relationship | How fees are typically structured
Set based on the complexity of the family relationship dispute, the number of parties involved, and whether the case is expected to settle in mediation or require full litigation with genetic testing and witness examination.
Court-ordered or court-referred genetic testing is billed separately from legal fees and is typically paid by the requesting party in advance, subject to reallocation depending on the outcome.
Includes the statutory stamp fee calculated on the nature of the claim and delivery costs for serving documents on all named parties, which can be more numerous than in an ordinary civil case given the range of parties with standing.
Some engagements include a success fee tied to the case reaching a final favorable judgment or mediation outcome, agreed upon separately from the retainer.
Administrative costs of obtaining certified registry documents (제적등본, 가족관계증명서 등) before and after judgment are generally minor but should be budgeted separately.
※ Costs vary depending on case complexity and specific circumstances; exact fees will be provided during consultation. No specific outcome is guaranteed.
Nonexistence of Biological Parent-Child Relationship | Self-Check Before You File
1️⃣ For a party who suspects a registered relationship is not biological
- Do you have any documented reason to suspect the recorded parent-child relationship is not biological?
- Was the child born during a marriage, or outside one - has this affected which type of action applies?
- Have you or the other party already had informal genetic testing done?
- Is the recorded parent still alive, or has the claim only become relevant after their death?
2️⃣ For heirs disputing another heir's status
- Would correcting the family register change how the estate is divided among heirs?
- Do you have a genuine legal interest that gives you standing to file (가사소송법 제28조)?
- Has probate or an inheritance dispute already started, and could this case affect its outcome?
3️⃣ For someone who was informally raised by non-biological parents (allo-adoption)
- Do you know or suspect that your birth report names people who are not your biological parents?
- Do your biological relatives acknowledge the actual birth circumstances?
- Are you seeking this correction to restore ties with biological relatives, or to resolve an inheritance question?
4️⃣ Evidence readiness
- Can you access the full family registry history, including closed registers (제적등본)?
- Are hospital or birth records from the time of birth still available?
- Are all parties willing to undergo genetic testing, or is refusal expected from one side?
Frequently Asked Questions
Official References
개인정보처리방침
제 1 조 수집하는 개인정보의 항목, 목적, 방법
제 2 조 개인정보의 처리 및 보유기간
제 3 조 개인정보의 제3자 제공
제 4 조 개인정보 처리업무의 위탁
제 5 조 정보주체의 권리·의무 및 그 행사방법
제 6 조 개인정보의 파기
제 7 조 의견수렴 및 불만처리
제 8 조 개인정보 처리방침의 변경
제 9 조 개인정보의 안전성 확보 조치
제 1 조 (수집하는 개인정보의 항목, 목적, 방법)
① 게시판 글 작성 시 필수 항목에 대한 수집목적은 ‘별도의 구체적 상담을 위하여’이며 수집항목은 ‘이름, 이메일, 연락처’입니다.
② 전항 외에 고객의 서비스 이용 과정이나 요청 사항 처리 과정에서 ‘IP주소, 접속로그, 단말기 및 환경정보, 서비스 이용기록, 쿠키’와 같은 정보들이 자동으로 수집 및 저장될 수 있으며, 이 때의 수집목적은 ‘사용자 홈페이지 이용, 사이트 이용에 대한 문의 민원 등 고객 고충 처리’입니다.
③ 사무소는 ‘홈페이지 고객 문의/고충 처리 시 전화 또는 인터넷을 통한 상담’과 같은 방법으로 개인정보를 수집합니다
제 2 조 (개인정보의 처리 및 보유기간)
관계법령의 규정에 따라 개인정보를 보존하여야 하는 의무가 있는 경우가 아닌 한, 정보주체의 개인정보는 원칙적으로 해당 개인정보의 처리목적이 달성될 때까지 보유 및 이용되며, 그 목적이 달성되면 지체 없이 파기됩니다.
제 3 조 (개인정보의 제3자 제공)
사무소는 정보주체의 개인정보를 본 처리방침에서 명시한 목적에 한해서만 처리하며 정보주체의 사전동의가 있는 경우 또는 개인정보보호법 등 관계법령의 규정에 의거한 경우에만 개인정보를 제3자에게 제공합니다. 사무소는 현재 개인정보를 제3자에게 제공하지 않고 있습니다.
제 4 조 (개인정보 처리업무의 위탁)
사무소는 현재 귀하의 개인정보 보호를 위해 귀하의 개인정보를 직접 취급 관리하고 있습니다. 단, 향후 보다 전문적인 서비스를 제공하기 위하여 제3의 전문기관에 귀하의 정보를 위탁할 필요가 있다고 판단되는 경우, 귀하의 사전 동의 하에 개인정보에 대한 취급을 위탁할 수 있습니다.
제 5 조 (정보주체의 권리·의무 및 그 행사방법)
① 정보주체는 개인정보보호법 등 관계법령이 정하는 바에 따라 사무소에 대해 개인정보의 열람, 정정 및 삭제, 처리정지 요구 등 개인정보 보호 관련 권리를 행사할 수 있습니다.
② 제1항에 따른 권리행사는 정보주체의 법정대리인이나 위임을 받은 사람을 통해서도 할 수 있습니다. 다만, 이 경우에는 개인정보보호법 시행규칙에 따른 위임장을 사무소에 제출하여야 합니다.
③ 사무소는 정보주체의 권리행사에 대하여 개인정보보호법 등 관계법령이 정하는 바에 따라 지체 없이 조치하겠습니다.
제 6 조 (개인정보의 파기)
① 사무소는 원칙적으로 개인정보의 처리목적이 달성된 경우 등 그 개인정보가 불필요하게 되었을 때에는 지체 없이 해당 개인정보를 파기합니다.
② 사무소가 관계법령의 규정에 따라 개인정보를 파기하지 아니하고 보존하여야 하는 경우에는 해당 개인정보 또는 개인정보파일을 다른 개인정보와 분리해서 저장·관리 합니다.
③ 사무소는 파기사유가 발생한 개인정보를 선정하여 개인정보 보호책임자의 승인을 받아 해당 개인정보를 파기합니다.
④ 사무소는 파기하여야 할 개인정보가 전자적 파일 형태인 경우 복원이 불가능한 방법으로 영구 삭제하며, 이외의 기록물, 인쇄물, 서면, 그 밖의 기록매체인 경우 파쇄 또는 소각합니다.
제 7 조 (의견수렴 및 불만처리)
정보주체는 개인정보 보호 관련 문의, 불만처리, 피해구제 등에 관한 사항을 아래 개인정보 보호책임자 또는 담당부서에 문의하실 수 있습니다. 사무소는 정보주체의 문의에 대하여 신속하고 충분한 답변을 드릴 것입니다.
개인정보 보호 책임자 : 변호사
연락처 : 02.
제 8 조 (개인정보 처리방침의 변경)
사무소의 개인정보 처리방침은 관련 법령, 지침 및 사무소 내부규정에 따라 변경될 수 있으며, 개인정보 처리방침이 변경되는 경우 관련 법령이 정하는 방법에 따라 공개합니다.
제 9 조 (개인정보의 안전성 확보 조치)
사무소는 개인정보의 안전성 확보를 위해 다음과 같은 조치를 취하고 있습니다.
관리적 조치 : 내부관리계획의 수립 및 시행, 구성원에 대한 정기적인 개인정보 보호교육 등
기술적 조치 : 개인정보처리시스템 등의 접근권한 관리, 접근통제시스템 설치, 고유식별정보 등의 암호화, 보안프로그램의 설치 등
물리적 조치 : 전산실, 자료보관실 등 개인정보 보관장소에 대한 접근통제