Civil Litigation

Claim Objection Suit Lawyer

Claim Objection Suit Lawyer | Stopping Enforcement Before It's Too Late

Summary

A claim objection suit (청구이의의 소) is a lawsuit filed by a debtor to challenge the enforceability of a title of obligation (판결, 지급명령, 공증된 채무이행 약정 등) when the underlying claim has been extinguished or changed after that title was created — for example, because the debt was already paid, offset, or settled. It does not reopen the original trial on the merits; it only addresses events that happened after the title became final (민사집행법 제44조). Because enforcement can proceed while the suit is pending, an urgent application to stay enforcement is usually filed alongside the suit.

Civil · Enforcement Governing law: Civil Execution Act (민사집행법) Debtor-side procedure

Claim Objection Suit | What Can Actually Be Raised in a Claim Objection Suit

Because a claim objection suit is not a second trial on the original dispute, the grounds you can raise are limited by law. Courts generally require that the ground for objection arose after the title of obligation became final, unless the title is a notarized deed rather than a judgment (민사집행법 제44조 제2항).

Payment / Performance

The debt was already paid or performed
If the debtor paid the debt in full or in part after the judgment or payment order became final, that payment can be raised as a ground to stop or reduce enforcement. Partial payment reduces the enforceable amount rather than eliminating the title entirely, so documentation of the exact payment date and amount matters.

Set-off

The claim was extinguished by set-off
If the debtor had a separate claim against the creditor and validly declared set-off (상계) after the title became final, the underlying obligation may be considered extinguished to that extent. The timing of the set-off declaration relative to the finalization of the title is closely scrutinized.

Settlement / Waiver

A later settlement, waiver, or novation changed the obligation
A subsequent agreement — such as a settlement reducing the amount owed, a waiver of the debt, or a novation replacing the original obligation — can be raised if it occurred after the title was finalized.

Statute of Limitations

The claim became time-barred after the title was issued
Execution titles themselves are subject to renewal periods, and if the extinctive prescription period for the underlying claim ran out after the judgment (in cases where a fresh limitation period applies), this can be a ground for objection.

Defect in the Notarized Deed

The notarized deed of execution itself is invalid
For notarized deeds (공증된 채무이행 약정 공정증서), because there was no court judgment on the merits, defects that existed at the time the deed was made — such as forgery, lack of authority, or invalidity of the underlying contract — can also be raised, unlike with a final judgment (민사집행법 제44조 제2항 단서).

What Cannot Be Raised Again

Arguments that were already litigated and decided in the original trial — such as disputing that the debt existed in the first place, when a judgment already found that it did — generally cannot be relitigated through a claim objection suit against a judgment. Res judicata bars re-arguing issues that were or could have been raised before the judgment became final.

Claim Objection Suit | How the Suit Interacts With the Original Title

Understanding what a claim objection suit can and cannot do prevents wasted time on the wrong procedure.

It Targets the Execution Title, Not the Original Case

The suit is filed against the creditor who holds the title of obligation, and its purpose is to have the court declare that the title should no longer be enforced, in whole or in part (민사집행법 제44조 제1항). It is filed in the court that has jurisdiction depending on the type of title — for a judgment, the first-instance court that issued it.

Different Rules for Judgments vs. Notarized Deeds

If the title is a final judgment, only grounds arising after the judgment's conclusion of oral argument can be raised. If the title is a notarized deed of execution rather than a judgment, there was never a court review of the merits, so grounds that existed even before the deed was made can also be argued (민사집행법 제44조 제2항).

Multiple Grounds Must Be Raised Together

If a debtor has several separate grounds for objection, all of them must be asserted in the same suit; grounds that could have been raised but were left out generally cannot be the basis of a second claim objection suit later (민사집행법 제45조). This makes early, thorough case review important before filing.

Claim Objection Suit | Getting an Execution Stay Before Assets Are Seized

Filing the suit itself does not automatically stop enforcement. A separate, urgent application is usually necessary to prevent seizure while the case is pending.

Execution Stay Is a Separate Application

A debtor who has filed a claim objection suit can separately apply to the court for an order suspending enforcement pending the outcome of the suit (민사집행법 제46조 제2항). The court may require the debtor to provide security (a deposit or guarantee) as a condition of granting the stay.

Timing Is Critical

Because seizure or auction can proceed quickly once execution has started, the stay application is typically filed at the same time as, or immediately after, the claim objection suit itself — not after enforcement is already substantially completed. Once an asset such as real estate has been sold at auction and the proceeds distributed, a stay can no longer undo that step.

Provisional Nature of the Stay

An execution stay is provisional; it lasts only while the claim objection suit is pending and is reassessed if circumstances change. If the suit is ultimately dismissed, enforcement generally resumes and the security deposited may be applied toward the creditor's costs or damages caused by the delay.

Claim Objection Suit | From Case Review to Resolution

Case and Title Review
Review the title of obligation (judgment, payment order, or notarized deed) and identify every event that happened after it was issued — payments, agreements, set-offs — that could support an objection.

File the Claim Objection Suit
File the suit in the court with jurisdiction over the original title, setting out all available grounds together, since omitted grounds generally cannot be raised in a later suit (민사집행법 제45조).

Apply for an Execution Stay
File the urgent application to suspend enforcement, usually alongside the suit, and prepare for the possibility that the court will require a security deposit.

Litigate the Merits
Present documentary evidence of payment, set-off, settlement, or defects in the notarized deed. The creditor will typically dispute the timing or validity of these events.

Judgment and Effect on Enforcement
If the debtor prevails, the court declares that enforcement based on the title is impermissible in whole or in part, and any pending enforcement procedure is terminated to that extent.

Claim Objection Suit | How Fees Are Structured

Retainer Fee
Typically set based on the amount still being enforced against the debtor and the complexity of the grounds raised (e.g., a straightforward payment record versus a disputed set-off or forged notarized deed).

Execution Stay Application Fee
Because the stay application is a separate urgent procedure from the main suit, it is usually billed separately, reflecting the additional drafting and, if required, the arrangement of security.

Security Deposit
If the court orders a security deposit as a condition of the stay, this amount is set by the court and is separate from attorney fees; it is generally returned or applied depending on the final outcome.

Court Costs and Stamp Duty
Filing fees are calculated based on the value of the claim being contested, similar to other civil suits, plus service-of-process costs.

Success Fee
If agreed, a success fee may apply depending on the portion of the enforcement amount that is successfully blocked or reduced.

※ Costs vary depending on case complexity and specific circumstances; exact fees will be provided during consultation. No specific outcome is guaranteed.

Claim Objection Suit | Self-Check Before Filing

1️⃣ Identify the Title of Obligation

Is enforcement based on a final judgment, a payment order (지급명령), or a notarized deed of execution?
Do you have a copy of the title and know exactly when it became final?
Has enforcement (seizure, auction notice) already started, or is it only being threatened?

2️⃣ Check Whether Your Ground Arose After the Title

Did the payment, settlement, or set-off happen after the judgment's oral argument concluded, or after the notarized deed was made?
If the title is a notarized deed, do you have grounds that existed even before it was made (e.g., forgery, no authority to sign)?
Do you have receipts, bank transfer records, or written agreements proving the later event?

3️⃣ Assess the Urgency

How much time remains before the next enforcement step (auction date, wage garnishment start)?
Can you prepare or arrange a security deposit if the court requires one for a stay?
Have you gathered all grounds you might have, since they generally must be raised together?

Frequently Asked Questions

Q. I already paid off the debt, but the other side is still trying to seize my account. What can I do?

A. If the payment was made after the judgment or payment order became final, this is a classic ground for a claim objection suit (민사집행법 제44조). You should also file an urgent application to stay enforcement so the account is not seized while the suit is pending.

Q. Can I raise a claim objection suit to argue that I never owed the money in the first place?

A. If a court already issued a final judgment finding that the debt existed, that finding generally cannot be relitigated through a claim objection suit, because of res judicata. This ground is more likely to succeed against a notarized deed, since no court reviewed the merits when the deed was created.

Q. Does filing a claim objection suit automatically stop the seizure of my wages or property?

A. No. Filing the suit alone does not suspend enforcement. A separate application for an execution stay must be filed, and the court may require a security deposit before granting it (민사집행법 제46조 제2항).

Q. What is the difference between objecting to a judgment and objecting to a notarized deed?

A. For a judgment, only events occurring after the conclusion of oral argument can be raised. For a notarized deed of execution, since there was no trial on the merits, defects existing even before the deed was signed — such as forgery or invalidity of the underlying contract — can also be argued (민사집행법 제44조 제2항).

Q. I have several reasons to object — do I need to raise them all at once?

A. Yes. Grounds available at the time of filing generally must be raised together in the same suit; a ground that could have been raised but was omitted usually cannot support a second claim objection suit later (민사집행법 제45조).

Q. What happens if I lose the claim objection suit after getting a stay of enforcement?

A. If the suit is dismissed, the execution stay is lifted and enforcement generally resumes. If a security deposit was required for the stay, it may be applied toward the creditor's losses caused by the delay, such as accrued interest or auction costs.

Q. How long does a claim objection suit usually take?

A. Duration depends on the complexity of the grounds and whether the creditor disputes the facts (e.g., disputing whether a payment was actually made). Straightforward cases with clear documentary proof of payment tend to move faster than cases involving disputed set-off or allegations of forgery.

Q. Can I still file a claim objection suit after the auction of my property has already been completed?

A. Once an auction has been finalized and proceeds distributed, a claim objection suit generally cannot undo that completed step, which is why timing the suit and stay application before major enforcement steads is important.

Q. Do I need a lawyer to file a claim objection suit?

A. It is not legally required, but because the available grounds are narrowly defined and must all be raised together, working with a civil litigation lawyer familiar with execution procedure can help avoid losing an argument permanently by omission.

Official References

개인정보처리방침

법무법인 프런티어(이하 “사무소”)는 개인정보보호법에 따라 정보주체의 개인정보 및 권익을 보호하고 개인정보와 관련된 정보주체의 고충을 신속하고 원활하게 처리하기 위하여 본 개인정보 처리방침을 수립·공개합니다.

제 1 조 수집하는 개인정보의 항목, 목적, 방법
제 2 조 개인정보의 처리 및 보유기간
제 3 조 개인정보의 제3자 제공
제 4 조 개인정보 처리업무의 위탁
제 5 조 정보주체의 권리·의무 및 그 행사방법
제 6 조 개인정보의 파기
제 7 조 의견수렴 및 불만처리
제 8 조 개인정보 처리방침의 변경
제 9 조 개인정보의 안전성 확보 조치

제 1 조 (수집하는 개인정보의 항목, 목적, 방법)
① 게시판 글 작성 시 필수 항목에 대한 수집목적은 ‘별도의 구체적 상담을 위하여’이며 수집항목은 ‘이름, 이메일, 연락처’입니다.
② 전항 외에 고객의 서비스 이용 과정이나 요청 사항 처리 과정에서 ‘IP주소, 접속로그, 단말기 및 환경정보, 서비스 이용기록, 쿠키’와 같은 정보들이 자동으로 수집 및 저장될 수 있으며, 이 때의 수집목적은 ‘사용자 홈페이지 이용, 사이트 이용에 대한 문의 민원 등 고객 고충 처리’입니다.
③ 사무소는 ‘홈페이지 고객 문의/고충 처리 시 전화 또는 인터넷을 통한 상담’과 같은 방법으로 개인정보를 수집합니다

제 2 조 (개인정보의 처리 및 보유기간)
관계법령의 규정에 따라 개인정보를 보존하여야 하는 의무가 있는 경우가 아닌 한, 정보주체의 개인정보는 원칙적으로 해당 개인정보의 처리목적이 달성될 때까지 보유 및 이용되며, 그 목적이 달성되면 지체 없이 파기됩니다.

제 3 조 (개인정보의 제3자 제공)
사무소는 정보주체의 개인정보를 본 처리방침에서 명시한 목적에 한해서만 처리하며 정보주체의 사전동의가 있는 경우 또는 개인정보보호법 등 관계법령의 규정에 의거한 경우에만 개인정보를 제3자에게 제공합니다. 사무소는 현재 개인정보를 제3자에게 제공하지 않고 있습니다.

제 4 조 (개인정보 처리업무의 위탁)
사무소는 현재 귀하의 개인정보 보호를 위해 귀하의 개인정보를 직접 취급 관리하고 있습니다. 단, 향후 보다 전문적인 서비스를 제공하기 위하여 제3의 전문기관에 귀하의 정보를 위탁할 필요가 있다고 판단되는 경우, 귀하의 사전 동의 하에 개인정보에 대한 취급을 위탁할 수 있습니다.

제 5 조 (정보주체의 권리·의무 및 그 행사방법)
① 정보주체는 개인정보보호법 등 관계법령이 정하는 바에 따라 사무소에 대해 개인정보의 열람, 정정 및 삭제, 처리정지 요구 등 개인정보 보호 관련 권리를 행사할 수 있습니다.
② 제1항에 따른 권리행사는 정보주체의 법정대리인이나 위임을 받은 사람을 통해서도 할 수 있습니다. 다만, 이 경우에는 개인정보보호법 시행규칙에 따른 위임장을 사무소에 제출하여야 합니다.
③ 사무소는 정보주체의 권리행사에 대하여 개인정보보호법 등 관계법령이 정하는 바에 따라 지체 없이 조치하겠습니다.

제 6 조 (개인정보의 파기)
① 사무소는 원칙적으로 개인정보의 처리목적이 달성된 경우 등 그 개인정보가 불필요하게 되었을 때에는 지체 없이 해당 개인정보를 파기합니다.
② 사무소가 관계법령의 규정에 따라 개인정보를 파기하지 아니하고 보존하여야 하는 경우에는 해당 개인정보 또는 개인정보파일을 다른 개인정보와 분리해서 저장·관리 합니다.
③ 사무소는 파기사유가 발생한 개인정보를 선정하여 개인정보 보호책임자의 승인을 받아 해당 개인정보를 파기합니다.
④ 사무소는 파기하여야 할 개인정보가 전자적 파일 형태인 경우 복원이 불가능한 방법으로 영구 삭제하며, 이외의 기록물, 인쇄물, 서면, 그 밖의 기록매체인 경우 파쇄 또는 소각합니다.

제 7 조 (의견수렴 및 불만처리)
정보주체는 개인정보 보호 관련 문의, 불만처리, 피해구제 등에 관한 사항을 아래 개인정보 보호책임자 또는 담당부서에 문의하실 수 있습니다. 사무소는 정보주체의 문의에 대하여 신속하고 충분한 답변을 드릴 것입니다.

개인정보 보호 책임자 : 변호사
연락처 : 02.

제 8 조 (개인정보 처리방침의 변경)
사무소의 개인정보 처리방침은 관련 법령, 지침 및 사무소 내부규정에 따라 변경될 수 있으며, 개인정보 처리방침이 변경되는 경우 관련 법령이 정하는 방법에 따라 공개합니다.

제 9 조 (개인정보의 안전성 확보 조치)
사무소는 개인정보의 안전성 확보를 위해 다음과 같은 조치를 취하고 있습니다.
관리적 조치 : 내부관리계획의 수립 및 시행, 구성원에 대한 정기적인 개인정보 보호교육 등
기술적 조치 : 개인정보처리시스템 등의 접근권한 관리, 접근통제시스템 설치, 고유식별정보 등의 암호화, 보안프로그램의 설치 등
물리적 조치 : 전산실, 자료보관실 등 개인정보 보관장소에 대한 접근통제