Damages Litigation Lawyer | What victims need to know before filing a claim
Summary
A damages claim (손해배상청구) is a civil action seeking money from a person or entity whose intentional or negligent act caused you loss (민법 제750조). As the victim, you generally carry the burden of proving that the other party acted wrongfully, that you suffered a specific loss, and that the two are causally connected. The amount you can recover is not automatic - it depends on how well the loss is documented and how the court weighs each party's degree of fault (민법 제396조, 제763조).
Korean law recognizes several routes for a victim to seek compensation, depending on the relationship between the parties and how the harm occurred. Identifying the correct legal ground early affects what you need to prove and how long you have to file.
General Tort
Intentional or negligent act causing harm
Under the general tort provision, anyone who intentionally or negligently infringes another's rights and causes damage must compensate for it (민법 제750조). This is the basis for most traffic accident, assault, and everyday negligence claims. You must show the wrongful act, the loss, and a causal link between them.
Special Torts
Employer, facility owner, or joint tortfeasor liability
The Civil Act also imposes liability on employers for harm caused by employees in the course of work (민법 제756조) and on possessors of structures for defects in their management (민법 제758조). Where multiple people jointly caused the harm, each is liable for the full amount and the victim may claim against any of them (민법 제760조).
Contractual Route
Breach of a duty owed under a contract
If the harm arose from a failure to perform an obligation - for example, a doctor's duty of care under a treatment contract, or a contractor's defective work - a claim can be based on non-performance of obligation (민법 제390조) instead of, or alongside, a tort claim. The statute of limitations and burden of proof can differ between the two routes.
Special Statutes
Claims under specific compensation statutes
Certain areas have their own compensation frameworks that supplement or modify the general Civil Act rules, such as the Act on the Compensation for Vehicle Accident Victims for traffic accidents, or product liability rules for defective goods. These can shift the burden of proof or set different standards for calculating loss.
Limitation Periods You Should Not Miss
A tort damages claim generally expires three years from when the victim knew (or should have known) of both the damage and the person liable, and in any case ten years from the date of the wrongful act (민법 제766조). Missing these periods can permanently bar an otherwise valid claim, so early consultation matters even if you are not ready to file immediately.
Damages Litigation | What You Actually Have to Prove
Many victims assume that suffering harm is enough to win compensation. In practice, Korean courts require the claimant to establish each element of the claim, and disputes usually center on one or two of them rather than all.
The wrongful act and fault
You must show the other party acted intentionally or negligently (민법 제750조). For professionals such as doctors or drivers, negligence is measured against the standard of care expected in that role, which is often where expert opinion becomes decisive.
Actual loss, not just a bad outcome
A bad result alone - a failed surgery, a lost deal - does not automatically mean compensable loss occurred. The court looks for a concrete, quantifiable loss such as medical costs, lost income, or property damage that flows from the wrongful act.
Causation between the act and the loss
Even where fault and loss both exist, you must connect them. This is often the most contested issue in medical malpractice and workplace injury cases, where pre-existing conditions or other contributing factors can weaken the causal link.
Damages Litigation | What Categories of Loss Can Be Claimed
Damages are not a single lump figure - they are built up from distinct categories, each requiring its own evidence. Understanding these categories helps victims avoid underestimating (or losing) parts of their claim.
Actual property loss (적극적 손해)
This covers direct out-of-pocket costs: medical bills, repair costs, funeral expenses in death cases, and other expenses actually incurred because of the incident. Receipts and invoices are the primary evidence.
Lost profit (소극적 손해)
This is the income or profit you would have earned had the wrongful act not occurred - typically lost wages during recovery, or reduced future earning capacity from a permanent disability. Calculating this often relies on income records and, in serious injury cases, a labor capacity loss rate from a medical appraisal.
Non-pecuniary loss (위자료)
Courts may award compensation for mental suffering even without a fixed formula, considering the severity of the harm, the degree of the other party's fault, and the relationship between the parties (민법 제751조, 제752조). In death or serious permanent injury cases, family members may also claim their own mental suffering damages.
Damages Litigation | Building the Evidence That Wins or Loses the Case
Because the victim carries the burden of proof, the outcome of a damages case is often decided by how thoroughly the loss was documented from the start, not just by legal argument at trial.
Medical and expert records
For injury or malpractice claims, contemporaneous medical records, imaging, and - where liability is disputed - an independent medical appraisal are often central to establishing both the extent of injury and its cause.
Comparative negligence of the victim
Even a valid claim can be reduced if the victim also contributed to the harm - for example, a pedestrian who crossed against a signal. Courts apply a comparative fault percentage that directly reduces the final award, so how the incident is reconstructed matters as much as proving the other side's fault.
Preserving evidence early
CCTV footage, black box recordings, and witness accounts can disappear or become unreliable within weeks. Where the other party is uncooperative, provisional measures such as evidence preservation applications can help secure key materials before a full lawsuit is filed.
Damages Litigation | From Consultation to Resolution
1
Initial review of facts and evidence We review what happened, what documentation already exists (medical records, photos, contracts, correspondence), and identify the applicable legal basis and likely opposing arguments.
2
Loss calculation and demand We work out a itemized calculation of actual costs, lost income, and non-pecuniary damages, then typically send a formal demand letter (내용증명) to the other party before litigation.
3
Filing suit or applying for a payment order If negotiation fails, we file a civil lawsuit for damages, or in clearer cases a payment order procedure (지급명령), and where urgent, provisional attachment to secure the other party's assets in advance.
4
Fact-finding and expert appraisal The court process typically involves document exchange, witness examination, and, in injury or malpractice cases, appointment of a medical or accident-reconstruction appraiser.
5
Judgment, settlement, or enforcement The case ends by settlement, mediation, or judgment. If the other party still does not pay after a favorable judgment, we can pursue compulsory enforcement against their assets.
Damages Litigation | How Fees Are Structured
Retainer (착수금) Generally set based on the amount claimed and the complexity of proving fault and causation - malpractice and multi-party cases usually require more preparation than a straightforward traffic accident claim.
Success fee (성공보수) Usually calculated as a percentage of the amount actually recovered through settlement or judgment, so it is discussed and agreed upfront before filing.
Expert and appraisal costs (감정료) Medical appraisals, accident reconstruction, or forensic accounting fees are billed separately from legal fees and vary by case, since they are paid to third-party experts, not the firm.
Court costs and filing fees (인지·송달료) These are fixed by the amount of the claim under the relevant court rules and are paid to the court, not the firm; a portion can often be recovered from the losing party if you win.
※ Costs vary depending on case complexity and specific circumstances; exact fees will be provided during consultation. No specific outcome is guaranteed.
Damages Litigation | Self-Check Before You File
1️⃣ Traffic Accident Victims
Did you receive a police report or accident confirmation document?
Have you kept all medical records and diagnosis certificates from the start of treatment?
Has the insurer's settlement offer been compared against a lawyer's calculation of lost income and non-pecuniary damages?
Could you have contributed to the accident in a way that reduces your recovery?
2️⃣ Medical Malpractice Victims
Have you obtained your full medical records and imaging from the hospital?
Is there a clear gap between the treatment you received and what a reasonable standard of care would require?
Have you considered requesting an independent medical appraisal before filing suit?
Are you still within the three-year period from when you learned of the harm and the responsible party?
3️⃣ Workplace Injury Victims
Have you filed or considered filing for industrial accident compensation insurance benefits separately?
Does your employer's degree of fault (e.g., missing safety measures) go beyond what industrial accident insurance already covers?
Have you documented lost income and any permanent disability rating?
4️⃣ Fraud or Contract-Related Loss
Do you have written evidence of the misrepresentation or broken promise (messages, contracts, deposit records)?
Have you calculated your actual monetary loss separately from any emotional distress?
Is a related criminal complaint (사기) also being considered alongside the civil claim?
Frequently Asked Questions
Q. How long do I have to file a damages claim?
A. For most tort claims, you generally have three years from when you knew (or should have known) of the damage and the liable party, and no more than ten years from the date of the wrongful act itself (민법 제766조). The exact starting point can be disputed, especially in malpractice or latent injury cases, so it's worth getting an early opinion.
Q. How is the amount of compensation actually calculated?
A. Courts typically add together actual costs incurred (적극적 손해), lost income or earning capacity (소극적 손해), and non-pecuniary damages for suffering (위자료), then reduce the total by your own percentage of fault if any (과실상계). There is no fixed formula for non-pecuniary damages, so comparable case outcomes and the severity of harm are used as reference points.
Q. Can I still claim if I was partly at fault too?
A. Yes, but your award will usually be reduced in proportion to your share of fault, a doctrine called comparative negligence. How the incident is reconstructed - through CCTV, witness statements, or accident analysis - often determines this percentage, so it directly affects your final recovery.
Q. Do I need a criminal conviction against the other party before I can sue for damages?
A. No. A civil damages claim is independent from any criminal case and uses a lower standard of proof, so you can file even if no criminal charges were brought, if charges were dropped, or while a criminal case is still pending. That said, evidence gathered in a criminal investigation can sometimes support the civil claim.
Q. What if the other party has no money to pay even after I win?
A. A judgment alone does not guarantee payment. If the other party doesn't pay voluntarily, you can pursue compulsory enforcement against their bank accounts, wages, or property, which is why checking the other party's assets - and considering provisional attachment before filing - matters early in the case.
Q. Should I go through insurance negotiation or file a lawsuit directly?
A. It depends on how far apart your calculation is from the insurer's or opposing party's offer. Many cases start with a demand letter or negotiation, and move to litigation only if the gap in valuation - particularly over lost income or non-pecuniary damages - cannot be closed.
Q. Can family members claim damages if a loved one died or was seriously injured?
A. Yes. In death cases, the deceased's spouse, parents, and children (and in some cases other close relatives) can claim their own non-pecuniary damages for their loss (민법 제752조), in addition to any claim inherited from the deceased's estate.
Q. What's the difference between filing a civil suit and a payment order (지급명령)?
A. A payment order is a faster, simplified procedure suited to claims where the amount owed is relatively clear and unlikely to be seriously disputed. If the other party formally objects, the case automatically converts into a regular lawsuit, so it works best for straightforward, well-documented claims.
법무법인 프런티어(이하 “사무소”)는 개인정보보호법에 따라 정보주체의 개인정보 및 권익을 보호하고 개인정보와 관련된 정보주체의 고충을 신속하고 원활하게 처리하기 위하여 본 개인정보 처리방침을 수립·공개합니다.
제 1 조 수집하는 개인정보의 항목, 목적, 방법
제 2 조 개인정보의 처리 및 보유기간
제 3 조 개인정보의 제3자 제공
제 4 조 개인정보 처리업무의 위탁
제 5 조 정보주체의 권리·의무 및 그 행사방법
제 6 조 개인정보의 파기
제 7 조 의견수렴 및 불만처리
제 8 조 개인정보 처리방침의 변경
제 9 조 개인정보의 안전성 확보 조치
제 1 조 (수집하는 개인정보의 항목, 목적, 방법)
① 게시판 글 작성 시 필수 항목에 대한 수집목적은 ‘별도의 구체적 상담을 위하여’이며 수집항목은 ‘이름, 이메일, 연락처’입니다.
② 전항 외에 고객의 서비스 이용 과정이나 요청 사항 처리 과정에서 ‘IP주소, 접속로그, 단말기 및 환경정보, 서비스 이용기록, 쿠키’와 같은 정보들이 자동으로 수집 및 저장될 수 있으며, 이 때의 수집목적은 ‘사용자 홈페이지 이용, 사이트 이용에 대한 문의 민원 등 고객 고충 처리’입니다.
③ 사무소는 ‘홈페이지 고객 문의/고충 처리 시 전화 또는 인터넷을 통한 상담’과 같은 방법으로 개인정보를 수집합니다
제 2 조 (개인정보의 처리 및 보유기간)
관계법령의 규정에 따라 개인정보를 보존하여야 하는 의무가 있는 경우가 아닌 한, 정보주체의 개인정보는 원칙적으로 해당 개인정보의 처리목적이 달성될 때까지 보유 및 이용되며, 그 목적이 달성되면 지체 없이 파기됩니다.
제 3 조 (개인정보의 제3자 제공)
사무소는 정보주체의 개인정보를 본 처리방침에서 명시한 목적에 한해서만 처리하며 정보주체의 사전동의가 있는 경우 또는 개인정보보호법 등 관계법령의 규정에 의거한 경우에만 개인정보를 제3자에게 제공합니다. 사무소는 현재 개인정보를 제3자에게 제공하지 않고 있습니다.
제 4 조 (개인정보 처리업무의 위탁)
사무소는 현재 귀하의 개인정보 보호를 위해 귀하의 개인정보를 직접 취급 관리하고 있습니다. 단, 향후 보다 전문적인 서비스를 제공하기 위하여 제3의 전문기관에 귀하의 정보를 위탁할 필요가 있다고 판단되는 경우, 귀하의 사전 동의 하에 개인정보에 대한 취급을 위탁할 수 있습니다.
제 5 조 (정보주체의 권리·의무 및 그 행사방법)
① 정보주체는 개인정보보호법 등 관계법령이 정하는 바에 따라 사무소에 대해 개인정보의 열람, 정정 및 삭제, 처리정지 요구 등 개인정보 보호 관련 권리를 행사할 수 있습니다.
② 제1항에 따른 권리행사는 정보주체의 법정대리인이나 위임을 받은 사람을 통해서도 할 수 있습니다. 다만, 이 경우에는 개인정보보호법 시행규칙에 따른 위임장을 사무소에 제출하여야 합니다.
③ 사무소는 정보주체의 권리행사에 대하여 개인정보보호법 등 관계법령이 정하는 바에 따라 지체 없이 조치하겠습니다.
제 6 조 (개인정보의 파기)
① 사무소는 원칙적으로 개인정보의 처리목적이 달성된 경우 등 그 개인정보가 불필요하게 되었을 때에는 지체 없이 해당 개인정보를 파기합니다.
② 사무소가 관계법령의 규정에 따라 개인정보를 파기하지 아니하고 보존하여야 하는 경우에는 해당 개인정보 또는 개인정보파일을 다른 개인정보와 분리해서 저장·관리 합니다.
③ 사무소는 파기사유가 발생한 개인정보를 선정하여 개인정보 보호책임자의 승인을 받아 해당 개인정보를 파기합니다.
④ 사무소는 파기하여야 할 개인정보가 전자적 파일 형태인 경우 복원이 불가능한 방법으로 영구 삭제하며, 이외의 기록물, 인쇄물, 서면, 그 밖의 기록매체인 경우 파쇄 또는 소각합니다.
제 7 조 (의견수렴 및 불만처리)
정보주체는 개인정보 보호 관련 문의, 불만처리, 피해구제 등에 관한 사항을 아래 개인정보 보호책임자 또는 담당부서에 문의하실 수 있습니다. 사무소는 정보주체의 문의에 대하여 신속하고 충분한 답변을 드릴 것입니다.
개인정보 보호 책임자 : 변호사
연락처 : 02.
제 8 조 (개인정보 처리방침의 변경)
사무소의 개인정보 처리방침은 관련 법령, 지침 및 사무소 내부규정에 따라 변경될 수 있으며, 개인정보 처리방침이 변경되는 경우 관련 법령이 정하는 방법에 따라 공개합니다.
제 9 조 (개인정보의 안전성 확보 조치)
사무소는 개인정보의 안전성 확보를 위해 다음과 같은 조치를 취하고 있습니다.
관리적 조치 : 내부관리계획의 수립 및 시행, 구성원에 대한 정기적인 개인정보 보호교육 등
기술적 조치 : 개인정보처리시스템 등의 접근권한 관리, 접근통제시스템 설치, 고유식별정보 등의 암호화, 보안프로그램의 설치 등
물리적 조치 : 전산실, 자료보관실 등 개인정보 보관장소에 대한 접근통제