Franchise Litigation Lawyer | Protecting Franchisees When the Franchisor Breaches the Deal
Summary
Franchise disputes usually arise when a franchisor fails to disclose material information before signing, terminates a franchise agreement without proper cause or procedure, forces the purchase of supplies at inflated prices, or encroaches on a franchisee's protected territory. The Fair Franchise Transactions Act (가맹사업거래의 공정화에 관한 법률) gives franchisees specific rights to demand disclosure, refuse unfair terms, and seek damages or contract renewal. Whether your case is resolved through mediation, a complaint to the Korea Fair Trade Commission, or civil litigation depends heavily on what evidence exists and how the contract is drafted.
Franchise Litigation | What a Franchisee Can Actually Claim
The Fair Franchise Transactions Act lists specific franchisor obligations and prohibited conduct. Most franchisee disputes fall into one of the categories below, and identifying the right category early shapes the entire strategy.
Art. 7
Failure to Provide or Explain the Information Disclosure Document
A franchisor must provide an information disclosure document at least 14 days before signing and explain its key contents (가맹사업거래의 공정화에 관한 법률 제7조). If the disclosure document omitted material facts about expected sales, costs, or the franchisor's litigation history, the franchisee may be able to void the contract or claim damages.
Art. 9
False or Exaggerated Information
Providing false or exaggerated projected profit information to induce a franchise agreement is prohibited (가맹사업거래의 공정화에 관한 법률 제9조). This is frequently the basis for claims when actual sales fall far short of what was represented during recruitment.
Art. 10
Unjustified Refusal to Renew
A franchisee who has operated for 10 years or less generally has a statutory right to request renewal, and the franchisor cannot refuse without a legally recognized reason (가맹사업거래의 공정화에 관한 법률 제10조). Rejecting renewal outside these listed reasons can itself be challenged.
Art. 12
Unfair Trade Practices
This includes forcing the franchisee to purchase supplies from designated vendors at unreasonable prices, restricting business hours or area beyond what is necessary, or interfering with normal operations (가맹사업거래의 공정화에 관한 법률 제12조). Whether a specific practice counts as "unfair" is decided case by case, based on how much it deviates from ordinary commercial reasonableness.
Art. 12-4
Territorial Encroachment
Opening another franchise or a company-owned outlet inside the franchisee's contractually protected territory during the agreement term can constitute a violation (가맹사업거래의 공정화에 관한 법률 제12조의4). This is one of the most litigated issues in the food and retail franchise sectors.
Art. 14
Termination Without the Required Two-Notice Procedure
A franchisor generally must give the franchisee at least two separate written notices, each with a grace period of at least two months, before terminating for breach (가맹사업거래의 공정화에 관한 법률 제14조). A termination that skips this procedure can be disputed as invalid, even if the underlying breach itself is real.
What Doesn't Automatically Qualify
Not every business downturn or disagreement over marketing decisions is a legal violation - the Act targets conduct that exceeds ordinary commercial risk allocation. Whether a particular disclosure gap, price structure, or termination notice actually crosses that line depends on the specific contract terms and the surrounding facts, so this framework is a starting point for review, not a checklist for automatic recovery.
Franchise Litigation | When the Information Disclosure Document Misled You
Many franchisees sign based on projected sales figures and cost estimates presented during recruitment. When those numbers turn out to be disconnected from reality, the question becomes whether this was ordinary business risk or a disclosure violation.
The 14-Day Waiting Period
The disclosure document must be handed over and explained at least 14 days before the franchise agreement or any advance payment is made (가맹사업거래의 공정화에 관한 법률 제7조). A contract signed within that window, or without a proper explanation of key terms, is a factual point worth documenting early - text messages, emails, and the dated disclosure document itself matter.
Exaggerated Projected Profit Information
If a franchisor's recruiter presented expected daily sales or profit margins that had no reasonable basis, this may fall under the prohibition on providing false or exaggerated information (가맹사업거래의 공정화에 관한 법률 제9조). The gap between what was promised and actual performance, combined with any written or recorded representations, forms the core of this type of claim.
What Evidence Actually Matters
Recruitment brochures, the signed disclosure document, any recorded sales-projection presentations, and the franchisee's own sales records over time are the documents most often examined in these disputes. Franchisees who kept these records from the outset are generally in a stronger position when a dispute later arises.
Franchise Litigation | Contesting an Unjustified or Procedurally Flawed Termination
A sudden termination notice is often the moment a franchisee first seeks legal advice. Two separate questions need to be answered: was there a valid ground for termination, and was the required procedure actually followed.
The Two-Notice Rule
Except in cases involving serious grounds explicitly listed by law (such as bankruptcy or loss of a required license), a franchisor must send at least two separate written notices demanding cure, each allowing a grace period of two months or more, before terminating (가맹사업거래의 공정화에 관한 법률 제14조). A one-shot termination letter, without this staged warning process, is frequently challengeable regardless of whether the alleged breach itself occurred.
Refusal to Renew After Long-Term Operation
If you have operated the franchise for 10 years or less in total, you generally have a right to request contract renewal, and the franchisor's refusal must fall within the specific reasons allowed by law (가맹사업거래의 공정화에 관한 법률 제10조). Past that 10-year mark, the analysis shifts toward the specific renewal terms written into your original contract.
Responding to a Termination Notice
Once a termination notice arrives, the immediate priority is preserving evidence of ongoing operations and responding in writing within any stated cure period, rather than simply closing the store. Continuing to operate while formally disputing the termination's validity is often possible and can preserve more options than walking away immediately.
Franchise Litigation | Forced Purchasing, Territory Disputes, and Other Unfair Conduct
Beyond disclosure and termination, day-to-day operational disputes - being forced to buy supplies through the franchisor at above-market prices, or watching a new branch open a few blocks away - are common sources of conflict.
Mandatory Supply Purchases
Requiring purchase of specific raw materials or equipment from a designated vendor is not automatically unlawful, but doing so at prices unreasonably above market rate, or expanding the mandatory list beyond what is stated in the contract, can be scrutinized as an unfair trade practice (가맹사업거래의 공정화에 관한 법률 제12조). Comparing your actual supply invoices against market pricing is often the first practical step.
New Branches Inside Your Territory
If your franchise agreement defines a protected territory (whether by administrative district or a radius), and the franchisor or another franchisee opens a competing outlet inside that boundary during your contract term, this may constitute an actionable territorial violation (가맹사업거래의 공정화에 관한 법률 제12조의4). The exact territorial boundary language in your contract, not just common sense proximity, determines the outcome.
Retaliation for Raising Complaints
Some franchisees hesitate to formally raise a dispute out of concern the franchisor will retaliate through supply delays or selective enforcement of minor contract terms. The Act also restricts retaliatory conduct against franchisees who report violations or participate in mediation, which is a separate point worth raising if it occurs.
Franchise Litigation | Franchise Fees, Deposits, and Return of Payments
Disputes over money - the initial franchise fee, a security deposit, or ongoing royalty calculations - often run in parallel with the disputes described above.
Voiding the Contract and Recovering the Initial Fee
Where a disclosure violation or fraudulent inducement can be established, a franchisee may seek to void the agreement and recover the initial franchise fee and related setup costs already paid. This generally requires civil litigation rather than mediation, since it involves a direct monetary claim disputed by the franchisor.
Royalty and Advertising Fund Disputes
Disagreements over how royalties or mandatory advertising fund contributions are calculated, or whether the franchisor properly used the advertising fund for its stated purpose, are increasingly common. Contract language defining these calculations, together with the franchisor's actual accounting records, are central to resolving these disputes.
⚠ Deposit Refund Timing
If your franchise agreement is validly terminated or expires, review the specific return conditions in the contract for any security deposit - refund timing and any deductions the franchisor is entitled to make are usually set out there, and disputes often arise from ambiguous deduction clauses rather than the return obligation itself.
Franchise Litigation | From Initial Consultation to Resolution
1
Contract and Evidence Review The franchise agreement, information disclosure document, and any communications around signing or termination are reviewed together to identify which specific statutory violations, if any, apply to the facts.
2
Franchisor Contact or Formal Demand In many cases, a written demand letter addressing the specific issue - disputed termination, unpaid deposit, disclosure violation - is sent first, which sometimes resolves matters without further proceedings.
3
Mediation Application Disputes under the Fair Franchise Transactions Act can be brought to the Korea Fair Trade Mediation Agency's franchise dispute mediation committee, which offers a faster and lower-cost path than litigation for many cases.
4
Complaint to the Korea Fair Trade Commission For clear statutory violations such as unfair trade practices or disclosure failures, a complaint to the KFTC can trigger an investigation and potential corrective order against the franchisor, independent of any private damages claim.
5
Civil Litigation Where monetary recovery is the goal - damages, refund of fees, or a declaration that a termination is invalid - a civil lawsuit is filed, proceeding through pleadings, evidence submission, and typically one or more hearings before judgment.
Franchise Litigation | How Franchise Litigation Costs Are Structured
Retainer Fee Generally set based on the complexity of the dispute and the type of proceeding involved - a mediation filing typically costs less than a full civil lawsuit, and cases involving multiple claims (termination plus deposit plus damages) are assessed accordingly.
Contingency Fee For claims seeking monetary damages or a refund, a portion of the fee structure is often tied to the amount actually recovered, agreed upon in advance and set out in the retainer agreement.
Disbursements Court filing fees, service of process costs, and expert appraisal fees (for example, valuing lost profits or supply overcharges) are billed separately based on actual expenditure.
Mediation and KFTC Complaint Costs Filing a mediation request or a complaint with the Korea Fair Trade Commission generally involves lower fees than litigation, reflecting the more limited scope of representation required at that stage.
※ Costs vary depending on case complexity and specific circumstances; exact fees will be provided during consultation. No specific outcome is guaranteed.
Franchise Litigation | Franchisee Self-Check
1️⃣ Before You Signed the Agreement
Did you receive the information disclosure document at least 14 days before signing or paying any deposit?
Were the projected sales or profit figures presented to you documented in writing, or only spoken during a meeting?
Did the franchisor explain the disclosure document's contents to you directly, or just hand it over?
Have you kept copies of all recruitment materials, brochures, and messages from before signing?
2️⃣ If You Received a Termination Notice
Did the franchisor send at least two separate written notices with a grace period before this termination?
Does the notice specify the exact contract clause you allegedly breached?
How many years have you operated this franchise in total?
Have you responded in writing within any grace period stated in the notice?
3️⃣ Territory and Supply Disputes
Does your contract define a specific protected territory, by district name or radius?
Has a new branch of the same brand opened within that territory during your contract term?
Are you required to purchase supplies exclusively through the franchisor, and if so, at what price compared to market rate?
Has the list of mandatory purchase items grown since you signed the original agreement?
4️⃣ Money Already at Issue
What deposit amount did you pay, and what does the contract say about its return conditions?
Has the franchisor claimed any deductions from your deposit, and are those deductions itemized?
Are your royalty payments calculated according to the formula stated in your contract?
If there is an advertising fund, have you ever seen an accounting of how it was spent?
Frequently Asked Questions
Q. My franchisor sent one termination notice and says I have to close within a week. Is that valid?
A. Unless the reason falls into a narrow category of serious grounds listed by law, a franchisor must generally send at least two separate written notices, each giving a grace period of two months or more, before terminating (가맹사업거래의 공정화에 관한 법률 제14조). A single notice with a one-week deadline is very likely to be challengeable on procedural grounds alone.
Q. The sales figures I was shown before signing were far higher than what I actually earn. Can I do anything now?
A. If the franchisor presented projected sales or profit information that had no reasonable factual basis, this may fall under the prohibition on providing false or exaggerated information (가맹사업거래의 공정화에 관한 법률 제9조). Whether your specific case qualifies depends on what was documented at the time and how far actual performance diverged, so gathering the original recruitment materials is the first step.
Q. Can I get my franchise fee back if I decide to close the store?
A. Simply changing your mind or facing poor sales alone does not generally entitle you to a refund - the underlying contract terms govern voluntary closure. However, if the franchisor committed a disclosure violation or fraudulent inducement, voiding the agreement and recovering the initial fee becomes a separate legal claim worth reviewing.
Q. A new branch of the same brand just opened two blocks from mine. Is this legal?
A. It depends entirely on whether your contract defines a protected territory and how that boundary is drawn. If the new location falls inside a territory your contract protects, this can constitute a violation of the Act's territorial protection provisions (가맹사업거래의 공정화에 관한 법률 제12조의4); if your contract has no such territory clause, the analysis is much more limited.
Q. Do I have to go through mediation before I can sue my franchisor?
A. Mediation through the Korea Fair Trade Mediation Agency is not a mandatory prerequisite to filing a lawsuit, but it is often faster and less costly, and many franchisees pursue it first. If mediation fails to reach an agreement, filing a civil lawsuit remains available.
Q. The franchisor is forcing me to buy ingredients only from their designated supplier at high prices. Is that allowed?
A. A franchisor can require purchases from a designated supplier for quality control reasons, but pricing that is unreasonably above market rate, or expanding mandatory items beyond the original contract, may be scrutinized as an unfair trade practice (가맹사업거래의 공정화에 관한 법률 제12조). Comparing your actual invoices to market pricing helps establish whether this is the case.
Q. I've operated this franchise for 12 years. Can the franchisor refuse to renew my contract?
A. The statutory right to request renewal generally applies up to 10 years of total operation (가맹사업거래의 공정화에 관한 법률 제10조). Beyond that point, whether renewal can be refused depends on the specific renewal clause written into your original contract, so this requires a direct review of that document.
Q. What happens to my deposit if the franchisor terminates the contract?
A. The return conditions and any permitted deductions from a security deposit are usually specified in the franchise agreement itself. If the termination is later found invalid, or if the franchisor's deductions are not properly itemized and justified, this can become a separate claim for return of the deposit.
Q. Is it too late to raise a disclosure violation if I signed the contract two years ago?
A. This depends on the specific claim - a claim for damages generally has to be raised within the statute of limitations applicable to that type of claim, and delay can also make evidence harder to gather. It is worth having your specific timeline reviewed rather than assuming it is automatically too late.
Q. Can I keep operating my store while I dispute the termination?
A. In many cases, yes - disputing a termination's validity while continuing normal operations is often more advantageous than closing immediately, since closing can sometimes be read as accepting the termination. Each situation depends on the specific contract terms and how the franchisor is likely to respond, so this is worth discussing before deciding.
Q. Should I hire a lawyer or file a complaint with the KFTC myself first?
A. A complaint to the Korea Fair Trade Commission can trigger an investigation into the franchisor's conduct but does not by itself secure you compensation, since it addresses regulatory violations rather than your individual damages. Many franchisees pursue both a KFTC complaint and a private legal claim in parallel, and getting advice on how the two interact is often useful before filing either.
법무법인 프런티어(이하 “사무소”)는 개인정보보호법에 따라 정보주체의 개인정보 및 권익을 보호하고 개인정보와 관련된 정보주체의 고충을 신속하고 원활하게 처리하기 위하여 본 개인정보 처리방침을 수립·공개합니다.
제 1 조 수집하는 개인정보의 항목, 목적, 방법
제 2 조 개인정보의 처리 및 보유기간
제 3 조 개인정보의 제3자 제공
제 4 조 개인정보 처리업무의 위탁
제 5 조 정보주체의 권리·의무 및 그 행사방법
제 6 조 개인정보의 파기
제 7 조 의견수렴 및 불만처리
제 8 조 개인정보 처리방침의 변경
제 9 조 개인정보의 안전성 확보 조치
제 1 조 (수집하는 개인정보의 항목, 목적, 방법)
① 게시판 글 작성 시 필수 항목에 대한 수집목적은 ‘별도의 구체적 상담을 위하여’이며 수집항목은 ‘이름, 이메일, 연락처’입니다.
② 전항 외에 고객의 서비스 이용 과정이나 요청 사항 처리 과정에서 ‘IP주소, 접속로그, 단말기 및 환경정보, 서비스 이용기록, 쿠키’와 같은 정보들이 자동으로 수집 및 저장될 수 있으며, 이 때의 수집목적은 ‘사용자 홈페이지 이용, 사이트 이용에 대한 문의 민원 등 고객 고충 처리’입니다.
③ 사무소는 ‘홈페이지 고객 문의/고충 처리 시 전화 또는 인터넷을 통한 상담’과 같은 방법으로 개인정보를 수집합니다
제 2 조 (개인정보의 처리 및 보유기간)
관계법령의 규정에 따라 개인정보를 보존하여야 하는 의무가 있는 경우가 아닌 한, 정보주체의 개인정보는 원칙적으로 해당 개인정보의 처리목적이 달성될 때까지 보유 및 이용되며, 그 목적이 달성되면 지체 없이 파기됩니다.
제 3 조 (개인정보의 제3자 제공)
사무소는 정보주체의 개인정보를 본 처리방침에서 명시한 목적에 한해서만 처리하며 정보주체의 사전동의가 있는 경우 또는 개인정보보호법 등 관계법령의 규정에 의거한 경우에만 개인정보를 제3자에게 제공합니다. 사무소는 현재 개인정보를 제3자에게 제공하지 않고 있습니다.
제 4 조 (개인정보 처리업무의 위탁)
사무소는 현재 귀하의 개인정보 보호를 위해 귀하의 개인정보를 직접 취급 관리하고 있습니다. 단, 향후 보다 전문적인 서비스를 제공하기 위하여 제3의 전문기관에 귀하의 정보를 위탁할 필요가 있다고 판단되는 경우, 귀하의 사전 동의 하에 개인정보에 대한 취급을 위탁할 수 있습니다.
제 5 조 (정보주체의 권리·의무 및 그 행사방법)
① 정보주체는 개인정보보호법 등 관계법령이 정하는 바에 따라 사무소에 대해 개인정보의 열람, 정정 및 삭제, 처리정지 요구 등 개인정보 보호 관련 권리를 행사할 수 있습니다.
② 제1항에 따른 권리행사는 정보주체의 법정대리인이나 위임을 받은 사람을 통해서도 할 수 있습니다. 다만, 이 경우에는 개인정보보호법 시행규칙에 따른 위임장을 사무소에 제출하여야 합니다.
③ 사무소는 정보주체의 권리행사에 대하여 개인정보보호법 등 관계법령이 정하는 바에 따라 지체 없이 조치하겠습니다.
제 6 조 (개인정보의 파기)
① 사무소는 원칙적으로 개인정보의 처리목적이 달성된 경우 등 그 개인정보가 불필요하게 되었을 때에는 지체 없이 해당 개인정보를 파기합니다.
② 사무소가 관계법령의 규정에 따라 개인정보를 파기하지 아니하고 보존하여야 하는 경우에는 해당 개인정보 또는 개인정보파일을 다른 개인정보와 분리해서 저장·관리 합니다.
③ 사무소는 파기사유가 발생한 개인정보를 선정하여 개인정보 보호책임자의 승인을 받아 해당 개인정보를 파기합니다.
④ 사무소는 파기하여야 할 개인정보가 전자적 파일 형태인 경우 복원이 불가능한 방법으로 영구 삭제하며, 이외의 기록물, 인쇄물, 서면, 그 밖의 기록매체인 경우 파쇄 또는 소각합니다.
제 7 조 (의견수렴 및 불만처리)
정보주체는 개인정보 보호 관련 문의, 불만처리, 피해구제 등에 관한 사항을 아래 개인정보 보호책임자 또는 담당부서에 문의하실 수 있습니다. 사무소는 정보주체의 문의에 대하여 신속하고 충분한 답변을 드릴 것입니다.
개인정보 보호 책임자 : 변호사
연락처 : 02.
제 8 조 (개인정보 처리방침의 변경)
사무소의 개인정보 처리방침은 관련 법령, 지침 및 사무소 내부규정에 따라 변경될 수 있으며, 개인정보 처리방침이 변경되는 경우 관련 법령이 정하는 방법에 따라 공개합니다.
제 9 조 (개인정보의 안전성 확보 조치)
사무소는 개인정보의 안전성 확보를 위해 다음과 같은 조치를 취하고 있습니다.
관리적 조치 : 내부관리계획의 수립 및 시행, 구성원에 대한 정기적인 개인정보 보호교육 등
기술적 조치 : 개인정보처리시스템 등의 접근권한 관리, 접근통제시스템 설치, 고유식별정보 등의 암호화, 보안프로그램의 설치 등
물리적 조치 : 전산실, 자료보관실 등 개인정보 보관장소에 대한 접근통제