Investment Recovery Lawyer | What to do when your investment doesn't come back
Summary
Investment recovery covers the civil and criminal steps an investor takes when a company, fund manager, or individual fails to return invested capital or promised returns. The right strategy depends heavily on how the money was actually structured — as equity, a loan disguised as investment, or a fraudulent inducement — because that classification determines which claims are even available (민법 제741조, 민법 제750조). Because informal investments are rarely backed by solid paperwork, the first fight is often over proving what was actually agreed, and the second is finding assets before they disappear.
Investment Recovery | Was It Really an 'Investment,' or a Loan You Called an Investment?
Before any recovery strategy can be built, the money transfer has to be characterized correctly. Courts do not simply accept the label the parties used at the time — they look at what was actually agreed and how the risk was allocated.
Equity investment vs. disguised loan
If you bought shares or a membership interest and simply lost value because the business failed, that is investment risk you generally bear alone — there is no independent right to demand your principal back. But if the arrangement guaranteed a fixed return or principal repayment regardless of business performance, courts often treat it as a loan for consumption (민법 제598조) rather than a true investment, which opens the door to a straightforward repayment claim.
Why the paperwork you have (or don't have) decides everything
Many informal investments are documented only through KakaoTalk messages, bank transfer records, or a one-page memo. When there is no formal investment agreement, the burden falls on you to reconstruct the terms — deposit amounts, promised return dates, and any guarantee language — because that record will determine whether you can pursue a claim for return of unjust enrichment (부당이득반환청구, 민법 제741조) or breach of contract.
Partial recovery through unjust enrichment even without a written contract
Even where no clear contract exists, if the underlying project never happened, funds were diverted to an unrelated purpose, or the company was already insolvent when it took your money, a claim for unjust enrichment can sometimes recover funds that a straight contract claim could not reach.
Investment Recovery | Finding and Freezing Assets Before They Disappear
A favorable judgment is worthless if there is nothing left to collect against by the time you get it. In investment disputes, the counterparty often already knows repayment is unlikely and moves assets out of reach well before you file suit.
Provisional attachment as the first move, not an afterthought
Before or immediately after filing the main claim, a provisional attachment (가압류) can freeze the counterparty's bank accounts, real estate, or receivables so they cannot be sold or transferred while litigation proceeds. Because attachment applications are decided quickly and often without notice to the other side, moving early is usually the single most important tactical decision in an investment recovery case.
Locating hidden or transferred assets
If assets have already been moved to a spouse, relative, or shell company, an investor can pursue a creditor's right of revocation (채권자취소권, 민법 제406조) to undo a fraudulent transfer made to evade repayment. This requires showing the transfer was made knowing it would harm creditors, so timing and documentation of when the debt arose relative to the transfer matter a great deal.
Using formal disclosure procedures when you don't know what they own
Court-ordered financial disclosure and property list submission procedures can force a debtor who has already lost a judgment to disclose their assets, which is often the only realistic way an investor learns where remaining funds or property actually are.
Investment Recovery | When a Fraud Complaint Changes the Civil Case
Not every failed investment is a crime — but where the person who took your money never intended to use it as represented, a criminal complaint can create pressure and evidence that a civil suit alone cannot.
The line between a bad investment and fraud
Fraud (형법 제347조) requires proof that the other party deceived you about a material fact at the time they took your money — for example, fabricating a project, exaggerating expected returns with knowledge they were false, or already being insolvent while soliciting new investors. A business simply underperforming is not, by itself, fraud.
Why investors often file criminal complaints alongside a civil suit
A criminal investigation gives investigators the power to compel bank records and interview witnesses in ways an individual investor cannot on their own, and the resulting file can later be used as evidence in the civil case. It also creates real pressure on the counterparty to negotiate a settlement, since a criminal record carries consequences a civil judgment alone does not.
Multiple victims: joining forces changes the leverage
In fund and platform-investment cases, dozens or hundreds of investors are often affected by the same scheme. Coordinating with other victims — whether informally or through a joint criminal complaint — can strengthen the fraud narrative and improve access to whatever assets remain for distribution.
Investment Recovery | From Initial Consultation to Recovery
1
Document review and legal characterization We review transfer records, messages, and any agreement to determine whether the claim is best framed as loan repayment, breach of investment contract, unjust enrichment, or fraud.
2
Asset investigation Before filing, we check what is realistically available to collect against — real estate, business accounts, vehicles — since this shapes whether provisional attachment is worth pursuing immediately.
3
Provisional attachment and demand Where assets are identified, we file for provisional attachment to freeze them, often alongside a formal demand letter that starts the clock on interest and puts the counterparty on notice.
4
Civil suit and/or criminal complaint Depending on the facts, we file a civil claim for repayment or damages, a criminal complaint for fraud, or both in parallel to maximize pressure and evidence-gathering power.
5
Enforcement and collection After a favorable judgment or settlement, we pursue enforcement against the frozen or newly disclosed assets, including forced sale or garnishment where necessary.
Investment Recovery | How Fees Are Calculated
Retainer fee Generally calculated based on the claimed amount and the complexity of characterizing the investment (contract vs. loan vs. fraud), since that determines how much fact-finding is required before filing.
Contingency fee In recovery-focused cases, a portion of the fee is often structured as a percentage of amounts actually recovered, reflecting the reality that a judgment is only valuable if collection succeeds.
Provisional attachment costs Filing for provisional attachment requires a court-set security deposit (either cash or a guarantee insurance policy), which is separate from attorney fees and is refundable depending on the outcome.
Criminal complaint costs If a parallel fraud complaint is filed, fees are typically calculated separately from the civil case, reflecting the additional work of preparing a criminal complaint and coordinating with investigators.
Disbursements Court filing fees, service-of-process costs, and asset search fees (such as real estate and vehicle registration searches) are billed separately from attorney fees.
※ Costs vary depending on case complexity and specific circumstances; exact fees will be provided during consultation. No specific outcome is guaranteed.
Investment Recovery | Self-Check for Investors
1️⃣ Documentation Check
Do you have bank transfer records showing exactly when and how much you sent?
Is there any written agreement, even an informal memo or chat message, describing what was promised?
Did the other party promise a fixed return or guarantee return of principal regardless of business performance?
Do you have any record of the business plan or project you were told the funds would be used for?
2️⃣ Asset Situation Check
Do you know whether the counterparty (individual or company) owns real estate or a business account?
Has the counterparty recently transferred property to a family member or another entity?
Is the counterparty still operating, or have they become unreachable?
3️⃣ Fraud vs. Bad Investment Check
Was there a specific false statement about the project, license, or use of funds at the time you invested?
Was the counterparty already insolvent or already facing other investor complaints when they took your money?
Are there other investors in the same scheme you could coordinate with?
4️⃣ Timing Check
How long ago was the promised repayment or return date, and has time run since then?
Have you already sent a formal demand letter, and did you keep a record of it?
Is there a risk that a limitation period could be approaching for any part of your claim?
Frequently Asked Questions
Q. I invested money and was told it was 'not a loan,' so can I still get it back?
A. The label used at the time is not decisive. If a fixed return or guaranteed repayment of principal was promised regardless of business outcome, courts may treat the arrangement as a loan for consumption (민법 제598조) rather than pure equity investment, which supports a repayment claim. If it was genuine equity with no guarantee, recovery is harder and typically depends on proving fraud or mismanagement instead.
Q. The company just says the business failed — is that fraud?
A. Not necessarily. Fraud (형법 제347조) requires that the other party deceived you about a material fact at the time you invested, such as fabricating the project or already knowing they were insolvent. A legitimate business that simply underperformed does not, by itself, amount to fraud, even though it feels the same to the investor who lost money.
Q. What can I do if I'm afraid the other party is hiding or moving their assets?
A. A provisional attachment (가압류) can freeze bank accounts, real estate, or receivables before or during litigation, preventing further transfers while the case proceeds. If assets have already been moved, a creditor's revocation claim (채권자취소권, 민법 제406조) may be available to undo transfers made specifically to evade repayment.
Q. Should I file a criminal complaint, a civil suit, or both?
A. It depends on whether the facts support fraud and on what leverage you need. A criminal complaint can compel bank and phone records an individual investor cannot obtain alone and creates pressure for settlement, while a civil suit is usually necessary to actually recover money through a judgment and enforcement. Many investors pursue both in parallel.
Q. I have no written contract, only chat messages and bank transfers — is that enough?
A. It can be. Courts routinely rely on message threads, transfer records, and surrounding conduct to reconstruct what was actually agreed, and even without a full contract, a claim for unjust enrichment (부당이득반환청구, 민법 제741조) may be available where funds were taken but never used as represented.
Q. Is there a deadline for filing a claim to recover my investment?
A. General civil claims for money owed are subject to statutory limitation periods that can bar a claim entirely if too much time passes, so the specific deadline depends on how the claim is characterized (contract, unjust enrichment, or tort). Because this varies by case, it is worth having the timeline reviewed early rather than assuming there is no rush.
Q. Other people invested in the same company and are also unpaid — does that help me?
A. It can. Multiple victims coordinating, whether informally or through a joint criminal complaint, often strengthens the case that there was a pattern of deception rather than an isolated business failure, and it can improve practical access to whatever assets remain.
Q. What happens if I win the lawsuit but the other side has no money?
A. A judgment only entitles you to collect against assets that actually exist and can be located. This is why asset investigation and provisional attachment early in the process matter as much as the underlying legal claim, and why some cases pursue enforcement measures like forced disclosure of the debtor's property list after judgment.
Q. Can I get my money back if I invested through a crypto or overseas platform?
A. It's more difficult but not automatically impossible. Jurisdiction, the platform's actual operating entity, and whether any assets or bank accounts exist in Korea all affect whether Korean civil or criminal procedures can realistically be used, so this needs case-by-case review before deciding on a strategy.
Q. Do I need a lawyer, or can I just send a demand letter myself?
A. A demand letter is a reasonable first step and can be done without a lawyer, but if the other side does not respond, the next steps — provisional attachment, asset tracing, characterizing the claim correctly, and filing suit — involve procedural and evidentiary choices that are difficult to get right without experience. Consulting an investment recovery lawyer in Seoul or your local area before deadlines pass can help you preserve options like provisional attachment that lose value once the other side has already moved assets.
법무법인 프런티어(이하 “사무소”)는 개인정보보호법에 따라 정보주체의 개인정보 및 권익을 보호하고 개인정보와 관련된 정보주체의 고충을 신속하고 원활하게 처리하기 위하여 본 개인정보 처리방침을 수립·공개합니다.
제 1 조 수집하는 개인정보의 항목, 목적, 방법
제 2 조 개인정보의 처리 및 보유기간
제 3 조 개인정보의 제3자 제공
제 4 조 개인정보 처리업무의 위탁
제 5 조 정보주체의 권리·의무 및 그 행사방법
제 6 조 개인정보의 파기
제 7 조 의견수렴 및 불만처리
제 8 조 개인정보 처리방침의 변경
제 9 조 개인정보의 안전성 확보 조치
제 1 조 (수집하는 개인정보의 항목, 목적, 방법)
① 게시판 글 작성 시 필수 항목에 대한 수집목적은 ‘별도의 구체적 상담을 위하여’이며 수집항목은 ‘이름, 이메일, 연락처’입니다.
② 전항 외에 고객의 서비스 이용 과정이나 요청 사항 처리 과정에서 ‘IP주소, 접속로그, 단말기 및 환경정보, 서비스 이용기록, 쿠키’와 같은 정보들이 자동으로 수집 및 저장될 수 있으며, 이 때의 수집목적은 ‘사용자 홈페이지 이용, 사이트 이용에 대한 문의 민원 등 고객 고충 처리’입니다.
③ 사무소는 ‘홈페이지 고객 문의/고충 처리 시 전화 또는 인터넷을 통한 상담’과 같은 방법으로 개인정보를 수집합니다
제 2 조 (개인정보의 처리 및 보유기간)
관계법령의 규정에 따라 개인정보를 보존하여야 하는 의무가 있는 경우가 아닌 한, 정보주체의 개인정보는 원칙적으로 해당 개인정보의 처리목적이 달성될 때까지 보유 및 이용되며, 그 목적이 달성되면 지체 없이 파기됩니다.
제 3 조 (개인정보의 제3자 제공)
사무소는 정보주체의 개인정보를 본 처리방침에서 명시한 목적에 한해서만 처리하며 정보주체의 사전동의가 있는 경우 또는 개인정보보호법 등 관계법령의 규정에 의거한 경우에만 개인정보를 제3자에게 제공합니다. 사무소는 현재 개인정보를 제3자에게 제공하지 않고 있습니다.
제 4 조 (개인정보 처리업무의 위탁)
사무소는 현재 귀하의 개인정보 보호를 위해 귀하의 개인정보를 직접 취급 관리하고 있습니다. 단, 향후 보다 전문적인 서비스를 제공하기 위하여 제3의 전문기관에 귀하의 정보를 위탁할 필요가 있다고 판단되는 경우, 귀하의 사전 동의 하에 개인정보에 대한 취급을 위탁할 수 있습니다.
제 5 조 (정보주체의 권리·의무 및 그 행사방법)
① 정보주체는 개인정보보호법 등 관계법령이 정하는 바에 따라 사무소에 대해 개인정보의 열람, 정정 및 삭제, 처리정지 요구 등 개인정보 보호 관련 권리를 행사할 수 있습니다.
② 제1항에 따른 권리행사는 정보주체의 법정대리인이나 위임을 받은 사람을 통해서도 할 수 있습니다. 다만, 이 경우에는 개인정보보호법 시행규칙에 따른 위임장을 사무소에 제출하여야 합니다.
③ 사무소는 정보주체의 권리행사에 대하여 개인정보보호법 등 관계법령이 정하는 바에 따라 지체 없이 조치하겠습니다.
제 6 조 (개인정보의 파기)
① 사무소는 원칙적으로 개인정보의 처리목적이 달성된 경우 등 그 개인정보가 불필요하게 되었을 때에는 지체 없이 해당 개인정보를 파기합니다.
② 사무소가 관계법령의 규정에 따라 개인정보를 파기하지 아니하고 보존하여야 하는 경우에는 해당 개인정보 또는 개인정보파일을 다른 개인정보와 분리해서 저장·관리 합니다.
③ 사무소는 파기사유가 발생한 개인정보를 선정하여 개인정보 보호책임자의 승인을 받아 해당 개인정보를 파기합니다.
④ 사무소는 파기하여야 할 개인정보가 전자적 파일 형태인 경우 복원이 불가능한 방법으로 영구 삭제하며, 이외의 기록물, 인쇄물, 서면, 그 밖의 기록매체인 경우 파쇄 또는 소각합니다.
제 7 조 (의견수렴 및 불만처리)
정보주체는 개인정보 보호 관련 문의, 불만처리, 피해구제 등에 관한 사항을 아래 개인정보 보호책임자 또는 담당부서에 문의하실 수 있습니다. 사무소는 정보주체의 문의에 대하여 신속하고 충분한 답변을 드릴 것입니다.
개인정보 보호 책임자 : 변호사
연락처 : 02.
제 8 조 (개인정보 처리방침의 변경)
사무소의 개인정보 처리방침은 관련 법령, 지침 및 사무소 내부규정에 따라 변경될 수 있으며, 개인정보 처리방침이 변경되는 경우 관련 법령이 정하는 방법에 따라 공개합니다.
제 9 조 (개인정보의 안전성 확보 조치)
사무소는 개인정보의 안전성 확보를 위해 다음과 같은 조치를 취하고 있습니다.
관리적 조치 : 내부관리계획의 수립 및 시행, 구성원에 대한 정기적인 개인정보 보호교육 등
기술적 조치 : 개인정보처리시스템 등의 접근권한 관리, 접근통제시스템 설치, 고유식별정보 등의 암호화, 보안프로그램의 설치 등
물리적 조치 : 전산실, 자료보관실 등 개인정보 보관장소에 대한 접근통제