법무법인 프런티어
Assault Charges Lawyer
Assault Charges Lawyer | Understanding your charge and building a settlement strategy
Assault, aggravated assault, and bodily injury are three legally distinct charges under Korean criminal law, and each carries a different penalty range and different rules on settlement. Simple assault is a "semi-victim-complaint offense" (반의사불벌죄), meaning the case is dismissed if the victim withdraws the complaint before final judgment (형법 제260조 제3항), but aggravated assault and bodily injury are not. Because the classification of your case determines whether settlement alone can end the case, an early and accurate read of the facts matters as much as the settlement negotiation itself.
Assault Charges | Assault vs. Aggravated Assault vs. Bodily Injury
These three charges are often confused by defendants because they arise from the same kind of incident — a physical confrontation — but the legal consequences differ sharply. Below is how each is defined and why the distinction matters for your defense.
This covers an act of physical force against another person that does not result in an injury requiring medical treatment, such as a push, a slap, or a thrown object that misses or causes no lasting harm. It is punishable by up to two years imprisonment, a fine, detention, or a minor fine (형법 제260조 제1항). Critically, it is a semi-victim-complaint offense, so the case is closed if the victim withdraws the complaint (형법 제260조 제3항).
If the assault involves a dangerous weapon or object, or is committed by two or more people acting jointly, it is treated as aggravated assault and punished more severely — up to five years imprisonment or a fine up to 10 million won (형법 제261조). Everyday objects such as a bottle, a chair, or even a car can be classified as a 'dangerous object' depending on how it was used. Aggravated assault is not a semi-victim-complaint offense, so a settlement with the victim does not automatically terminate the case, though it remains a major sentencing factor.
Where the physical act actually causes an injury — a bruise requiring treatment, a fracture, or any diagnosed harm — the charge shifts from assault to bodily injury, punishable by up to seven years imprisonment, ten years suspension of qualification, or a fine up to 10 million won (형법 제257조 제1항). This is not a semi-victim-complaint offense. Whether an injury 'requiring treatment' actually occurred is frequently disputed and can turn on the medical certificate submitted by the alleged victim.
When an injury is caused using a dangerous weapon or by multiple people acting together, the charge becomes aggravated bodily injury, carrying a heavier statutory range and, in some circumstances, a mandatory minimum sentence (형법 제258조의2). This combination — weapon plus actual injury — is treated among the most serious charges in this group and settlement functions only as a sentencing factor, not as a basis for automatic dismissal.
Why the classification is contested from day one
Investigators and prosecutors sometimes charge the more serious offense first and let the defense argue it down, so an early factual argument about whether an object was truly 'dangerous' or whether an injury genuinely 'required treatment' can change which rules — including whether settlement can end the case — apply to you.
Assault Charges | Settlement Strategy Under the Semi-Victim-Complaint Rule
For simple assault, timing and structure of a settlement can be the single most decisive factor in the entire case. For the more serious charges, settlement still matters but works differently.
What 'semi-victim-complaint offense' actually means
For simple assault, if the victim submits a written withdrawal of the complaint (합의서 및 불처벌 의사표시) before the first-instance judgment, the prosecutor must issue a non-prosecution disposition or the court must dismiss the case (형법 제260조 제3항, 형사소송법 제232조). This makes settlement not just a mitigating factor but potentially case-ending — which is why the timing of when a settlement is reached matters enormously.
Settlement timing changes what it can achieve
A settlement reached during police investigation can support a non-prosecution recommendation; one reached after indictment can still end the case before trial if it is simple assault, or reduce sentencing severity for other charges. Once a first-instance judgment is rendered, a victim's later withdrawal of complaint for a semi-victim-complaint offense no longer has legal effect, so delaying settlement past that point forecloses the strongest available outcome.
Aggravated assault and bodily injury: settlement as mitigation, not dismissal
Because aggravated assault and bodily injury are not semi-victim-complaint offenses, a settlement does not automatically end the case even if the victim wants to withdraw the complaint. It remains, however, one of the most heavily weighted sentencing factors in practice, and can support a request for a non-prosecution disposition, suspended indictment, or a suspended sentence depending on the stage of the case.
Drafting the settlement document carefully
A settlement letter should clearly state the amount paid, that the victim withdraws any criminal complaint (합의 및 처벌불원 의사), and ideally that the victim will not file a separate civil claim for the same incident. Ambiguous wording can leave room for a victim to later claim the settlement did not cover criminal withdrawal, so the document should be reviewed before signing rather than after a dispute arises.
Assault Charges | Facts That Move a Case Between Charges
Because the boundary between these charges is fact-specific, the same incident can be charged very differently depending on how the object used, the number of participants, and the medical evidence are characterized.
What counts as a 'dangerous object'
Courts have found ordinary items — a beer bottle, a fist with a ring, even bare hands in some contexts of significant size or force disparity — can qualify as a dangerous object depending on how they were used and the risk they posed, not merely what the object normally is (관련 판례상 '위험한 물건'은 용도가 아니라 사용 방식과 위험성으로 판단됨). Arguing that the object used does not meet this threshold is often the first line of defense against an aggravated assault charge.
Whether an injury 'required medical treatment'
Bruising or soreness that resolves without treatment is generally treated as falling short of a bodily injury under the Criminal Act, whereas a diagnosed injury supported by a medical certificate typically is not. Because prosecutors often rely heavily on the initial hospital record, obtaining and reviewing that record early helps assess whether the injury element can realistically be challenged.
Joint acts and the 'two or more persons' element
Aggravated assault under 형법 제261조 also applies where two or more people act together even without a weapon. Whether a bystander who merely restrained someone is treated as a joint offender, or only the person who struck the blow is charged, is frequently contested and depends on the specific role each person played during the incident.
Assault Charges | From Police Report to Case Resolution
Before responding to a police summons, it helps to review the incident report and any medical documentation to identify which of the four charges above is most likely to apply, since this determines whether settlement can end the case outright.
The suspect is typically questioned once or twice, and it is important that the statement given is consistent with the objective evidence, since inconsistencies are frequently used to argue intent or the extent of force used.
Settlement discussions can begin as early as the police stage and often continue through indictment; the earlier a workable settlement is reached, the more dispositions remain available, including non-prosecution.
The prosecutor decides whether to issue a non-prosecution disposition, a suspended indictment, a summary indictment (fine only), or a formal indictment for trial, based on the severity of the charge, prior record, and settlement status.
If formally indicted, the case proceeds to trial where sentencing factors — including the timing and content of any settlement — are presented; if summarily indicted, the case is typically resolved by a fine without a full trial.
Assault Charges | How Legal Fees Are Generally Structured
Typically set based on the severity of the charge (simple assault vs. aggravated assault or bodily injury), the stage of the case (police investigation vs. after indictment), and the complexity of the factual dispute.
May be structured around specific outcomes such as a non-prosecution disposition, suspended indictment, or a favorable sentencing result, rather than a guaranteed win, since criminal outcomes cannot be promised.
The settlement amount paid to the victim is separate from legal fees and is negotiated directly between the parties; legal fees may include a component for drafting and reviewing the settlement document.
Includes costs such as obtaining medical records, expert opinions on injury severity if needed, and any court filing fees if the case proceeds to trial.
※ Costs vary depending on case complexity and specific circumstances; exact fees will be provided during consultation. No specific outcome is guaranteed.
Assault Charges | Self-Check Before Your Next Step
1️⃣ Identify Your Likely Charge
- Was any object involved, or was it bare-handed contact only?
- Did more than one person take part in the confrontation?
- Did the other party visit a hospital or obtain a medical certificate?
- Has the police report described your act as '폭행' (assault) or '상해' (injury)?
2️⃣ Settlement Readiness
- Has the victim indicated any willingness to discuss settlement?
- Do you have a clear record of what happened, including any witnesses?
- Has a first-instance judgment already been rendered in your case?
- Is there a written settlement draft that mentions withdrawal of the criminal complaint?
3️⃣ Evidence and Documentation
- Do you have copies of any CCTV footage, messages, or witness statements?
- Have you kept a copy of the medical certificate submitted by the other party, if any?
- Have you written down your own account of events while memory is fresh?
Frequently Asked Questions
Official References
개인정보처리방침
제 1 조 수집하는 개인정보의 항목, 목적, 방법
제 2 조 개인정보의 처리 및 보유기간
제 3 조 개인정보의 제3자 제공
제 4 조 개인정보 처리업무의 위탁
제 5 조 정보주체의 권리·의무 및 그 행사방법
제 6 조 개인정보의 파기
제 7 조 의견수렴 및 불만처리
제 8 조 개인정보 처리방침의 변경
제 9 조 개인정보의 안전성 확보 조치
제 1 조 (수집하는 개인정보의 항목, 목적, 방법)
① 게시판 글 작성 시 필수 항목에 대한 수집목적은 ‘별도의 구체적 상담을 위하여’이며 수집항목은 ‘이름, 이메일, 연락처’입니다.
② 전항 외에 고객의 서비스 이용 과정이나 요청 사항 처리 과정에서 ‘IP주소, 접속로그, 단말기 및 환경정보, 서비스 이용기록, 쿠키’와 같은 정보들이 자동으로 수집 및 저장될 수 있으며, 이 때의 수집목적은 ‘사용자 홈페이지 이용, 사이트 이용에 대한 문의 민원 등 고객 고충 처리’입니다.
③ 사무소는 ‘홈페이지 고객 문의/고충 처리 시 전화 또는 인터넷을 통한 상담’과 같은 방법으로 개인정보를 수집합니다
제 2 조 (개인정보의 처리 및 보유기간)
관계법령의 규정에 따라 개인정보를 보존하여야 하는 의무가 있는 경우가 아닌 한, 정보주체의 개인정보는 원칙적으로 해당 개인정보의 처리목적이 달성될 때까지 보유 및 이용되며, 그 목적이 달성되면 지체 없이 파기됩니다.
제 3 조 (개인정보의 제3자 제공)
사무소는 정보주체의 개인정보를 본 처리방침에서 명시한 목적에 한해서만 처리하며 정보주체의 사전동의가 있는 경우 또는 개인정보보호법 등 관계법령의 규정에 의거한 경우에만 개인정보를 제3자에게 제공합니다. 사무소는 현재 개인정보를 제3자에게 제공하지 않고 있습니다.
제 4 조 (개인정보 처리업무의 위탁)
사무소는 현재 귀하의 개인정보 보호를 위해 귀하의 개인정보를 직접 취급 관리하고 있습니다. 단, 향후 보다 전문적인 서비스를 제공하기 위하여 제3의 전문기관에 귀하의 정보를 위탁할 필요가 있다고 판단되는 경우, 귀하의 사전 동의 하에 개인정보에 대한 취급을 위탁할 수 있습니다.
제 5 조 (정보주체의 권리·의무 및 그 행사방법)
① 정보주체는 개인정보보호법 등 관계법령이 정하는 바에 따라 사무소에 대해 개인정보의 열람, 정정 및 삭제, 처리정지 요구 등 개인정보 보호 관련 권리를 행사할 수 있습니다.
② 제1항에 따른 권리행사는 정보주체의 법정대리인이나 위임을 받은 사람을 통해서도 할 수 있습니다. 다만, 이 경우에는 개인정보보호법 시행규칙에 따른 위임장을 사무소에 제출하여야 합니다.
③ 사무소는 정보주체의 권리행사에 대하여 개인정보보호법 등 관계법령이 정하는 바에 따라 지체 없이 조치하겠습니다.
제 6 조 (개인정보의 파기)
① 사무소는 원칙적으로 개인정보의 처리목적이 달성된 경우 등 그 개인정보가 불필요하게 되었을 때에는 지체 없이 해당 개인정보를 파기합니다.
② 사무소가 관계법령의 규정에 따라 개인정보를 파기하지 아니하고 보존하여야 하는 경우에는 해당 개인정보 또는 개인정보파일을 다른 개인정보와 분리해서 저장·관리 합니다.
③ 사무소는 파기사유가 발생한 개인정보를 선정하여 개인정보 보호책임자의 승인을 받아 해당 개인정보를 파기합니다.
④ 사무소는 파기하여야 할 개인정보가 전자적 파일 형태인 경우 복원이 불가능한 방법으로 영구 삭제하며, 이외의 기록물, 인쇄물, 서면, 그 밖의 기록매체인 경우 파쇄 또는 소각합니다.
제 7 조 (의견수렴 및 불만처리)
정보주체는 개인정보 보호 관련 문의, 불만처리, 피해구제 등에 관한 사항을 아래 개인정보 보호책임자 또는 담당부서에 문의하실 수 있습니다. 사무소는 정보주체의 문의에 대하여 신속하고 충분한 답변을 드릴 것입니다.
개인정보 보호 책임자 : 변호사
연락처 : 02.
제 8 조 (개인정보 처리방침의 변경)
사무소의 개인정보 처리방침은 관련 법령, 지침 및 사무소 내부규정에 따라 변경될 수 있으며, 개인정보 처리방침이 변경되는 경우 관련 법령이 정하는 방법에 따라 공개합니다.
제 9 조 (개인정보의 안전성 확보 조치)
사무소는 개인정보의 안전성 확보를 위해 다음과 같은 조치를 취하고 있습니다.
관리적 조치 : 내부관리계획의 수립 및 시행, 구성원에 대한 정기적인 개인정보 보호교육 등
기술적 조치 : 개인정보처리시스템 등의 접근권한 관리, 접근통제시스템 설치, 고유식별정보 등의 암호화, 보안프로그램의 설치 등
물리적 조치 : 전산실, 자료보관실 등 개인정보 보관장소에 대한 접근통제