Criminal Defense

Enforcement Evasion Lawyer

Enforcement Evasion Lawyer | Understanding the charge and building a defense

Summary

Enforcement evasion (강제집행면탈죄) punishes a person who, facing an imminent lawsuit or compulsory execution, hides, damages, falsely transfers, or fabricates a fictitious debt regarding their property with intent to harm a creditor (Criminal Act Article 327). It is a common companion charge to civil disputes over unpaid debts, divorce property division, or business insolvency. Whether the conduct amounted to a criminal "concealment" or a legitimate financial decision is almost always the central fight in these cases.

Criminal · Property Crime Governing law: Criminal Act Article 327 Asset concealment Civil-criminal overlap

Enforcement Evasion | What Article 327 Actually Requires

Enforcement evasion is not simply moving money around while owing someone. Prosecutors must establish several distinct elements, and a defense often succeeds by attacking just one of them.

Element 1

Imminent enforcement or lawsuit
The statute applies only when a lawsuit, provisional seizure, provisional disposition, or compulsory execution was pending or clearly imminent at the time of the act (형법 제327조). Asset transfers made long before any dispute arose, or with no connection to a specific creditor's claim, generally fall outside the statute.

Element 2

Concealment, damage, false transfer, or fictitious debt
The conduct must fall into one of these categories: physically hiding or destroying property, transferring title without a real underlying transaction, or fabricating a debt to a third party to reduce the pool of seizable assets. A genuine sale at fair value for a legitimate purpose is not automatically criminal.

Element 3

Intent to harm the creditor
The prosecution must show the defendant acted with intent to cause the creditor loss by defeating enforcement. Courts look at timing, whether consideration was paid, and whether the transferee is a family member or related party as circumstantial evidence of this intent.

Element 4

Risk of harm to the creditor
Case law generally requires that the conduct create a risk of prejudice to the creditor's ability to satisfy the claim through compulsory execution, not necessarily that actual loss already occurred.

Common Misunderstanding

Many people believe that if the transfer was to repay a real debt to another creditor, it cannot be a crime. That is not automatically true — even repaying an existing debt can be scrutinized if the timing and selection of which creditor to pay appears designed to defeat a specific pending claim. Each transaction needs to be examined on its own facts.

Enforcement Evasion | What Counts as Concealment or a Fictitious Transfer

The core factual dispute in most cases is whether a transaction was genuine or staged to frustrate a creditor.

Transfers to family members

Registering real estate or a vehicle in a spouse's or parent's name shortly before a judgment or seizure is one of the most commonly investigated patterns. Investigators look closely at whether money actually changed hands and whether the transferee had independent means to pay.

Business asset shuffling

Business owners facing a lawsuit sometimes move inventory, equipment, or receivables to a related company or a newly formed entity. Whether this is legitimate corporate restructuring or a fictitious transfer under Article 327 depends heavily on documentation and the timing relative to the creditor's claim.

Fabricated debts and false liens

Creating a fake loan agreement with a friend or relative and then registering a lien or mortgage to make the property appear encumbered is treated as a direct example of a 'fictitious debt' under the statute.

Enforcement Evasion | Why Timing Determines Whether the Act Is Criminal

The same transfer can be entirely lawful or clearly criminal depending only on when it happened relative to the creditor's dispute.

Before any dispute existed

If the transfer occurred well before any conflict with the alleged victim arose, and had a plausible independent business or personal reason, it is difficult for prosecutors to prove the 'imminence' element required by Article 327.

After a demand letter or lawsuit filing

Transfers that occur immediately after receiving a demand letter, being served with a complaint, or learning of an impending provisional seizure application draw the strongest suspicion, because the imminence and intent elements are easiest to infer from that sequence.

During a related civil case

Because enforcement evasion complaints frequently arise alongside a parallel civil suit for the underlying debt or property division, the criminal case often depends on facts developed in that civil proceeding, including the civil court's findings on the value and ownership of the disputed asset.

Enforcement Evasion | Building a Defense

Because enforcement evasion overlaps so heavily with ordinary financial and family transactions, defense work focuses on documenting the legitimate purpose of each disputed transaction.

Establishing a genuine transaction

Bank records showing actual payment, prior negotiation history, and a market-rate price are the strongest evidence that a transfer was a real sale rather than a sham. Working with an enforcement evasion lawyer in Seoul or elsewhere early, before formal questioning, helps preserve this documentation while it is still available.

Challenging the imminence and intent elements

Even where a transfer looks suspicious in hindsight, a defense can focus on showing the client had no knowledge of any impending claim at the time, or that the specific creditor now filing the complaint had not yet asserted any right against the property.

Addressing overlap with the civil case

Because a civil court's ruling on ownership or debt validity can heavily influence the criminal case, coordinating the civil defense and criminal defense strategy is often necessary rather than optional.

Enforcement Evasion | From Complaint to Resolution

Initial consultation and fact review
Reviewing the transaction documents, timing of the underlying civil dispute, and the specific transfer or concealment alleged in the complaint.

Police or prosecutor's office questioning
Preparing a written statement and attending questioning as a suspect (피의자), focusing on documenting the legitimate purpose behind the disputed transaction.

Evidence gathering and civil case coordination
Collecting bank records, contracts, and communications, and coordinating with any parallel civil litigation over the same asset or debt.

Prosecutor's disposition
The case may end in a non-indictment decision, summary indictment (약식기소) with a fine, or formal indictment for trial, depending on the strength of the evidence of intent.

Trial or plea-stage negotiation
If indicted, presenting evidence on the transaction's legitimacy and, where appropriate, addressing restitution or settlement with the creditor as a sentencing factor.

Enforcement Evasion | How Fees Are Set

Retainer (착수금)
Set based on the stage of the case (police investigation, prosecution, or trial) and the complexity of the underlying financial transactions that need to be documented.

Success fee (성공보수)
If used, tied to a defined outcome such as a non-indictment decision or a favorable disposition, and agreed in writing before representation begins.

Disbursements (실비)
Covers costs such as obtaining certified transaction records, court and prosecution filing fees, and expert review of financial documents where needed.

Civil case coordination fee
Where the criminal matter runs alongside a related civil suit, fees for coordinating both cases are quoted separately based on the scope of the civil work involved.

※ Costs vary depending on case complexity and specific circumstances; exact fees will be provided during consultation. No specific outcome is guaranteed.

Enforcement Evasion | Self-Check Before Your Consultation

1️⃣ For Someone Under Investigation

Did I transfer, sell, or hide any asset after learning about the creditor's claim or a pending lawsuit?
Do I have bank records or contracts proving I received real payment for the transfer?
Was the person I transferred property to a family member or close associate?
Have I received a summons or notice to appear for questioning as a suspect (피의자)?

2️⃣ For Someone Filing a Complaint as a Creditor

Did the debtor transfer or hide property after you filed a lawsuit or sought provisional seizure?
Do you have evidence the transfer was not for genuine consideration?
Have you already obtained a judgment or provisional seizure order that the transfer appears designed to defeat?
Is there a family relationship between the debtor and the person who received the asset?

3️⃣ Timing Red Flags

Did the disputed transfer happen within days or weeks of a demand letter, lawsuit, or seizure application?
Was there any legitimate business or family reason for the transfer that existed independently of the dispute?
Can the timeline be documented with dated records, not just recollection?

Frequently Asked Questions

Q. Is it a crime just to owe someone money and be unable to pay?

A. No. Simple inability to pay a debt is not a crime in Korea. Enforcement evasion under Article 327 requires an affirmative act — concealing, damaging, falsely transferring property, or fabricating a debt — done with intent to defeat a specific pending or imminent enforcement action (형법 제327조).

Q. What is the maximum penalty for enforcement evasion?

A. Article 327 of the Criminal Act provides for imprisonment of up to three years or a fine of up to 20 million won (형법 제327조). The actual disposition depends heavily on the value of the property involved and whether the creditor suffered actual loss.

Q. Can I be charged if I sold my house to my spouse before a lawsuit?

A. It depends on whether there was a genuine sale price actually paid and whether a lawsuit or enforcement action was already imminent at the time. Transfers to a spouse are scrutinized more closely, but a documented, fairly priced transaction made before any dispute arose is generally treated differently from a sham transfer made after being sued.

Q. Does the creditor have to prove they actually lost money?

A. Case law generally requires only that the conduct created a risk of prejudice to the creditor's ability to enforce the claim, not that the creditor has already suffered a final, quantified loss.

Q. Can the criminal case be resolved by paying back the creditor?

A. Repaying the debt or reaching a settlement with the creditor does not erase the elements of the charge, but it is commonly considered as a factor in the prosecutor's disposition or at sentencing, and can support a request for a non-indictment decision or a more lenient outcome.

Q. How does this charge relate to a divorce property division dispute?

A. Enforcement evasion complaints frequently arise when one spouse transfers assets during or before a divorce to reduce what is available for property division or child support enforcement. The criminal case in that context often runs in parallel with the family court proceeding.

Q. What should I do if I receive a request to appear for questioning?

A. Before responding, it is advisable to gather all documentation related to the disputed transaction, including bank statements and any contracts, and to consult with a lawyer about how to present the timeline and purpose of the transaction during questioning.

Q. Is a business restructuring automatically enforcement evasion?

A. No. Ordinary business decisions such as selling inventory, paying existing suppliers, or restructuring a company are not criminal simply because the business also owes money to another party. The analysis turns on whether the specific transaction was designed to defeat a particular pending claim.

Q. Can this charge be filed alongside fraud or other charges?

A. Yes. Enforcement evasion complaints are often filed together with related charges such as fraud or breach of trust when the same underlying transaction is alleged to involve deception of multiple parties, and each charge has separate elements that must be proven independently.

Official References

개인정보처리방침

법무법인 프런티어(이하 “사무소”)는 개인정보보호법에 따라 정보주체의 개인정보 및 권익을 보호하고 개인정보와 관련된 정보주체의 고충을 신속하고 원활하게 처리하기 위하여 본 개인정보 처리방침을 수립·공개합니다.

제 1 조 수집하는 개인정보의 항목, 목적, 방법
제 2 조 개인정보의 처리 및 보유기간
제 3 조 개인정보의 제3자 제공
제 4 조 개인정보 처리업무의 위탁
제 5 조 정보주체의 권리·의무 및 그 행사방법
제 6 조 개인정보의 파기
제 7 조 의견수렴 및 불만처리
제 8 조 개인정보 처리방침의 변경
제 9 조 개인정보의 안전성 확보 조치

제 1 조 (수집하는 개인정보의 항목, 목적, 방법)
① 게시판 글 작성 시 필수 항목에 대한 수집목적은 ‘별도의 구체적 상담을 위하여’이며 수집항목은 ‘이름, 이메일, 연락처’입니다.
② 전항 외에 고객의 서비스 이용 과정이나 요청 사항 처리 과정에서 ‘IP주소, 접속로그, 단말기 및 환경정보, 서비스 이용기록, 쿠키’와 같은 정보들이 자동으로 수집 및 저장될 수 있으며, 이 때의 수집목적은 ‘사용자 홈페이지 이용, 사이트 이용에 대한 문의 민원 등 고객 고충 처리’입니다.
③ 사무소는 ‘홈페이지 고객 문의/고충 처리 시 전화 또는 인터넷을 통한 상담’과 같은 방법으로 개인정보를 수집합니다

제 2 조 (개인정보의 처리 및 보유기간)
관계법령의 규정에 따라 개인정보를 보존하여야 하는 의무가 있는 경우가 아닌 한, 정보주체의 개인정보는 원칙적으로 해당 개인정보의 처리목적이 달성될 때까지 보유 및 이용되며, 그 목적이 달성되면 지체 없이 파기됩니다.

제 3 조 (개인정보의 제3자 제공)
사무소는 정보주체의 개인정보를 본 처리방침에서 명시한 목적에 한해서만 처리하며 정보주체의 사전동의가 있는 경우 또는 개인정보보호법 등 관계법령의 규정에 의거한 경우에만 개인정보를 제3자에게 제공합니다. 사무소는 현재 개인정보를 제3자에게 제공하지 않고 있습니다.

제 4 조 (개인정보 처리업무의 위탁)
사무소는 현재 귀하의 개인정보 보호를 위해 귀하의 개인정보를 직접 취급 관리하고 있습니다. 단, 향후 보다 전문적인 서비스를 제공하기 위하여 제3의 전문기관에 귀하의 정보를 위탁할 필요가 있다고 판단되는 경우, 귀하의 사전 동의 하에 개인정보에 대한 취급을 위탁할 수 있습니다.

제 5 조 (정보주체의 권리·의무 및 그 행사방법)
① 정보주체는 개인정보보호법 등 관계법령이 정하는 바에 따라 사무소에 대해 개인정보의 열람, 정정 및 삭제, 처리정지 요구 등 개인정보 보호 관련 권리를 행사할 수 있습니다.
② 제1항에 따른 권리행사는 정보주체의 법정대리인이나 위임을 받은 사람을 통해서도 할 수 있습니다. 다만, 이 경우에는 개인정보보호법 시행규칙에 따른 위임장을 사무소에 제출하여야 합니다.
③ 사무소는 정보주체의 권리행사에 대하여 개인정보보호법 등 관계법령이 정하는 바에 따라 지체 없이 조치하겠습니다.

제 6 조 (개인정보의 파기)
① 사무소는 원칙적으로 개인정보의 처리목적이 달성된 경우 등 그 개인정보가 불필요하게 되었을 때에는 지체 없이 해당 개인정보를 파기합니다.
② 사무소가 관계법령의 규정에 따라 개인정보를 파기하지 아니하고 보존하여야 하는 경우에는 해당 개인정보 또는 개인정보파일을 다른 개인정보와 분리해서 저장·관리 합니다.
③ 사무소는 파기사유가 발생한 개인정보를 선정하여 개인정보 보호책임자의 승인을 받아 해당 개인정보를 파기합니다.
④ 사무소는 파기하여야 할 개인정보가 전자적 파일 형태인 경우 복원이 불가능한 방법으로 영구 삭제하며, 이외의 기록물, 인쇄물, 서면, 그 밖의 기록매체인 경우 파쇄 또는 소각합니다.

제 7 조 (의견수렴 및 불만처리)
정보주체는 개인정보 보호 관련 문의, 불만처리, 피해구제 등에 관한 사항을 아래 개인정보 보호책임자 또는 담당부서에 문의하실 수 있습니다. 사무소는 정보주체의 문의에 대하여 신속하고 충분한 답변을 드릴 것입니다.

개인정보 보호 책임자 : 변호사
연락처 : 02.

제 8 조 (개인정보 처리방침의 변경)
사무소의 개인정보 처리방침은 관련 법령, 지침 및 사무소 내부규정에 따라 변경될 수 있으며, 개인정보 처리방침이 변경되는 경우 관련 법령이 정하는 방법에 따라 공개합니다.

제 9 조 (개인정보의 안전성 확보 조치)
사무소는 개인정보의 안전성 확보를 위해 다음과 같은 조치를 취하고 있습니다.
관리적 조치 : 내부관리계획의 수립 및 시행, 구성원에 대한 정기적인 개인정보 보호교육 등
기술적 조치 : 개인정보처리시스템 등의 접근권한 관리, 접근통제시스템 설치, 고유식별정보 등의 암호화, 보안프로그램의 설치 등
물리적 조치 : 전산실, 자료보관실 등 개인정보 보관장소에 대한 접근통제