Bodily Injury Lawyer
Bodily Injury Lawyer | Understanding the charge and building a defense from the accused's side
Bodily injury (sangae) occurs when a person's physical or mental state is impaired as a result of violence or another act, and it is punished more heavily than simple assault (형법 제257조). Whether the case is treated as bodily injury or mere assault depends on medical evidence and the degree of harm, while the actual sentence depends heavily on prior record, the manner of the act, and whether the victim has been compensated. This page is written from the perspective of a person accused of causing injury, focusing on how to respond at each stage of the investigation.
Contents
- 01vs Assault
- 02Injury & Intent
- 03Settlement
- 04Process
- 05Fees
- 06Checklist
- 07FAQ
Bodily Injury | Bodily Injury vs. Simple Assault — Why the Distinction Matters
Many clients are first questioned for 'assault' and later find the charge has been changed to 'bodily injury,' or vice versa. The two carry very different penalties and different rules on whether the case can proceed without the victim's complaint.
What separates the two charges
Simple assault (폭행) refers to physical force exerted on another person's body without necessarily causing an actual injury (형법 제260조). Bodily injury (상해) requires that the victim's physical or mental condition was actually impaired — for example, bruising that required treatment, a fracture, or a diagnosed psychological injury (형법 제257조). Whether a scratch or bruise rises to the level of 'injury' is decided case by case based on medical records, not by the label the police first use.
Why it matters for how the case proceeds
Simple assault is a offense that generally cannot be prosecuted against the victim's express wish not to prosecute (반의사불벌죄, 형법 제260조 제3항), meaning a settlement before charges are formally decided can end the case entirely. Bodily injury is not subject to this rule, so even a full settlement with the victim does not automatically stop prosecution — it instead becomes a strong sentencing factor. This is why the exact characterization of the charge is one of the first things a defense lawyer will examine.
Aggravated and group forms of the charge
If the injury was caused with a dangerous weapon, by two or more people acting together, or resulted in serious or permanent harm, the case may be charged under enhanced provisions such as the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Specific Crimes or aggravated bodily injury provisions (특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률, 형법 제258조). These carry a materially higher sentencing range and often affect whether pretrial detention is sought.
Bodily Injury | How Injury Severity and Intent Get Assessed
Two cases that look similar on the surface can end very differently depending on how the medical documentation reads and whether intent (or at least dolus eventualis) can be shown. This is usually where the real dispute in a bodily injury case lies.
Medical documentation drives the classification
Investigators and prosecutors rely heavily on the diagnosis period (weeks of treatment) noted in medical certificates. A short diagnosis period does not automatically mean a lighter charge, but it is one of the most persuasive pieces of evidence in negotiating both the charge and the sentence. Obtaining your own contemporaneous medical record, if you were also injured, can matter for a mutual-assault argument.
Intent doesn't have to be a plan to injure
Korean courts do not require proof that the defendant specifically intended to cause injury — intent to commit the underlying violent act, combined with an awareness that injury could result, can be enough (미필적 고의 concept applied under 형법 제257조). This means a defense based on 'I never meant to hurt them' rarely succeeds on its own; the more relevant question is often whether the act and the resulting harm can be causally and legally connected.
Self-defense and provocation as defenses
If the injury occurred while defending against an unlawful attack, self-defense (정당방위, 형법 제21조) may apply, though Korean courts apply it narrowly and generally require the response to be proportionate. Evidence that the victim provoked or initiated the physical confrontation — CCTV, witness statements, prior threats — is one of the most common and effective lines of defense in these cases.
Bodily Injury | Approaching Settlement With the Victim
Because bodily injury cannot be resolved simply by the victim withdrawing a complaint, settlement functions differently than in assault cases — it is a sentencing factor, not a case-ending event. Timing and how the settlement is documented both matter.
What a written settlement should contain
A settlement letter (합의서) should clearly state the amount paid, that the victim does not wish further punishment, and — where relevant — that the victim withdraws any complaint. Vague or informal apologies without documentation carry far less weight with investigators and judges than a signed, notarized-style settlement.
When direct contact with the victim is risky
Approaching the victim directly, especially after a no-contact request or a restraining request, can itself create additional legal exposure or be seen as pressure rather than genuine remorse. Settlement negotiations are often better conducted through counsel, who can also address the victim's counsel or family without escalating the conflict.
Settlement is not the only mitigating factor
Courts and prosecutors also weigh whether this is a first offense, whether the injury was caused in a sudden altercation versus premeditated conduct, and whether the accused has shown genuine remorse (e.g., voluntary medical expense payment before any settlement is finalized). Building a complete mitigation package alongside settlement — not relying on settlement alone — tends to produce a more consistent result.
⚠ Settlement timing affects what it can achieve
A settlement reached before the case is sent to the prosecutor can support a non-prosecution decision or a summary fine; one reached only after indictment mainly affects sentencing at trial. Waiting until the last minute narrows what settlement can realistically accomplish.
Bodily Injury | From Police Questioning to Case Resolution
We review the police report, any medical certificates, and the circumstances of the incident to assess whether the act is likely to be classified as assault or bodily injury, and what defenses are available.
We help prepare for questioning, review and respond to the victim's statement where possible, and begin settlement discussions if appropriate at this early stage.
Depending on severity, prior record, and settlement status, the prosecutor may issue a summary indictment (fine), a formal indictment for trial, or in some cases a non-prosecution disposition.
If indicted, we prepare sentencing materials — settlement documents, medical evidence, character references — and where facts are disputed, contest the classification of the charge or the existence of intent.
After resolution, we advise on any related civil liability for damages and, where applicable, appeal strategy if the outcome is unfavorable.
Bodily Injury | How Fees Are Determined
Set based on the stage the case is at (police investigation, prosecutor stage, or trial), the severity of the charge (simple bodily injury versus aggravated forms), and the complexity of the factual disputes.
Where agreed, may be tied to specific procedural outcomes such as a non-prosecution decision or a summary fine disposition rather than to any guarantee of acquittal.
Any settlement amount paid to the victim is separate from legal fees and is negotiated directly between the parties, though counsel typically facilitates and documents the negotiation.
Covers costs such as obtaining medical records, expert opinions on injury severity if needed, and other case-specific document fees.
※ Costs vary depending on case complexity and specific circumstances; exact fees will be provided during consultation. No specific outcome is guaranteed.
Bodily Injury | Self-Check for the Accused
1️⃣ Right After the Incident
- Have you avoided any further direct contact with the other party?
- Did you preserve any evidence showing who initiated the confrontation (CCTV, texts, witnesses)?
- If you were also injured, have you obtained your own medical documentation?
- Have you avoided posting about the incident on social media?
2️⃣ Assessing the Charge
- Do you know whether the police are treating this as assault or bodily injury?
- Has a diagnosis period (weeks of treatment) been issued for the victim's injury, and do you know what it says?
- Was a weapon or object involved, or was more than one person involved in the act?
- Do you have a prior record for violence-related offenses?
3️⃣ Settlement Strategy
- Has the victim indicated any willingness to discuss settlement?
- Do you understand that settlement here affects sentencing rather than automatically ending the case?
- Is any settlement discussion being documented in writing rather than left verbal?
- Are you avoiding direct contact with the victim where a no-contact request exists?