Criminal Defense

Lending Business Act Violation Lawyer

Lending Business Act Violation Lawyer | Understanding the Criminal and Administrative Exposure

Summary

The Act on Registration of Credit Business, etc. and Protection of Finance Users (commonly called the "Lending Business Act", 대부업법) regulates who may lend money for profit, how much interest may be charged, and how debts may be collected. Violations frequently lead to both a criminal case and separate administrative action by the local government or Financial Services Commission. Because unregistered lending, interest-rate violations, and illegal collection conduct each carry distinct elements and penalties, the right defense strategy depends on which specific provision is at issue and whether the conduct was a single incident or a repeated business practice.

Criminal · Administrative Related law: 대부업법 Unregistered Lending Interest Rate Cap

Lending Business Act Violation | Operating a Lending Business Without Registration

Lending money for profit as a business without registering with the relevant authority is a core violation under the Act, and prosecutors often focus on whether the conduct amounts to a 'business' rather than an isolated personal loan.

What counts as 'doing business'

A person who engages in money lending as a business without registering as a lending business operator can be punished (대부업법 제19조, 제3조). Whether a single loan to a friend or family member crosses into 'business' activity depends on repetition, advertising, and profit-seeking intent, and this factual question is often the central defense issue.

Corporate and unregistered branch structures

Operating through an unregistered branch, or continuing to lend after a registration has expired or been revoked, is treated the same as never having registered. Investigators typically review transaction records, advertising materials, and communication logs to establish the scale and continuity of the lending activity.

Lending Business Act Violation | Charging Interest Above the Statutory Ceiling

The Lending Business Act and the Interest Limitation Act set a maximum interest rate, and charging above that ceiling is a criminal offense regardless of whether the borrower agreed to the rate.

The statutory interest ceiling

A lender who receives interest exceeding the rate set by Presidential Decree can face criminal punishment (대부업법 제19조, 제8조). The ceiling has been lowered several times, so the applicable rate depends on when the loan agreement was made, which is a factual point worth checking carefully.

How disguised fees and 'agreed' rates are treated

Prosecutors and courts look past the label used in a contract — arrangement fees, late fees, and other charges collected alongside interest can be added back into the effective interest rate calculation. Defense often centers on recalculating exactly what portion of the total amount received legally qualifies as interest.

Lending Business Act Violation | Illegal Debt Collection Practices

Even a lawfully registered and properly priced loan can generate criminal liability if the collection method itself is illegal, since the Act separately restricts how debts may be collected.

Prohibited collection conduct

Using violence, threats, repeated visits or calls that cause fear, or disclosing a debtor's obligation to third parties (such as an employer or family member) to pressure repayment is prohibited (대부업법 제9조의4). These provisions apply not only to registered lenders but often to collection agents and third-party collectors acting on their behalf.

Distinguishing legitimate demand from harassment

Sending a formal demand letter or filing a civil suit is legitimate; the dispute usually arises over the frequency, timing, and manner of contact, and whether the debtor's workplace or family was informed without necessity. Call logs, message records, and witness statements from the debtor are typically the deciding evidence.

Lending Business Act Violation | From Investigation to Resolution

Initial Consultation & Case Review
We review the loan contracts, transaction records, and any collection communications to identify which specific provisions are implicated and whether the conduct is likely to be treated as a single act or an ongoing business.

Police/Prosecution Investigation Stage
For criminal violations, the case typically starts with a complaint or a referral from the financial supervisory authority, followed by a police or prosecutorial interview. Preparing a consistent account of the transaction history before questioning is important.

Parallel Administrative Review
Separately, the local government (Si/Gun/Gu) or Financial Services Commission may open an administrative review that can lead to business suspension or registration revocation, on a timeline independent of the criminal case.

Prosecution Decision
The prosecutor decides whether to indict, issue a summary indictment (fine-only), or close the case without charges depending on the amount involved, whether it was a first offense, and the harm caused to the borrower.

Trial or Negotiated Resolution
If indicted, the case proceeds to trial where sentencing factors such as the number of victims, total illegal interest collected, and any restitution made are argued; many cases are resolved through a summary order or negotiated plea on the facts.

Lending Business Act Violation | How Fees Are Calculated

Retainer Fee
The initial retainer is generally set based on the stage of the case (police investigation, prosecution, or trial), the number of victims or transactions involved, and the complexity of the interest-rate recalculation required.

Success Fee
If a success fee applies, it is typically tied to a defined and lawful outcome such as a non-indictment decision, a fine instead of imprisonment, or a suspended sentence, agreed upon in advance in writing.

Administrative Proceeding Fee
If a parallel administrative sanction (business suspension or registration revocation) must also be contested, this is usually billed as a separate matter because it involves different evidence and a different authority.

Disbursements
Costs such as document retrieval, expert calculation of effective interest rates, and travel to a court outside Seoul are billed separately as actual expenses.

※ Costs vary depending on case complexity and specific circumstances; exact fees will be provided during consultation. No specific outcome is guaranteed.

Lending Business Act Violation | Self-Check Before You Talk to Investigators

1️⃣ Am I Actually Running an Unregistered Lending Business?

Have I lent money to more than one person, or more than once to the same person, for profit?
Did I advertise or hold myself out as available to lend money?
Am I currently registered, or was my registration ever suspended or revoked before I continued lending?
Have I structured the loans through a company or informal branch that isn't registered?

2️⃣ Could My Interest Rate Exceed the Legal Cap?

Do I know the statutory interest ceiling in effect on the date each loan was made?
Did I collect any arrangement fees, late fees, or other charges on top of stated interest?
Have I calculated the effective annual rate including all fees, not just the labeled 'interest'?
Has a borrower disputed the amount of interest I collected?

3️⃣ Could My Collection Methods Be Considered Illegal?

Have I contacted a debtor's employer, coworkers, or family about the debt?
Have I visited or called a debtor repeatedly in a way that could be seen as intimidating?
Did I use threats, or imply consequences beyond a normal legal collection process?
Am I using a third-party collection agent, and do I know how they are contacting the debtor?

4️⃣ Am I Facing Both Criminal and Administrative Proceedings?

Have I received any notice from the local government or Financial Services Commission separate from a police summons?
Do I understand that resolving the criminal case does not automatically resolve an administrative suspension or revocation?
Have I kept copies of all loan agreements, ledgers, and payment records in case both proceedings request them separately?

Frequently Asked Questions

Q. Can I be charged if I only lent money to one person, not as a business?

A. A single loan to a friend or relative without any intent to profit repeatedly is less likely to be treated as 'engaging in lending as a business' under the Act (대부업법 제3조). However, if the loan carried high interest or was one of several similar transactions, investigators may still argue it qualifies as unregistered business activity, so the surrounding facts matter.

Q. What is the current maximum legal interest rate?

A. The maximum rate is set by Presidential Decree under the Lending Business Act and the Interest Limitation Act, and it has been revised multiple times, so the applicable ceiling depends on the date the loan agreement was signed (대부업법 제8조). Any interest collected above that rate can trigger criminal liability regardless of the borrower's consent.

Q. Is it illegal to contact a debtor's employer about an unpaid loan?

A. Disclosing a debtor's obligation to an employer, coworkers, or family members to pressure repayment is generally prohibited as an illegal collection method (대부업법 제9조의4). This applies even if the underlying loan itself was legally made.

Q. What is the difference between the criminal case and the administrative sanction?

A. The criminal case is prosecuted for punishment (fine or imprisonment) through the police and prosecutor's office, while the administrative sanction — such as business suspension or registration revocation — is handled separately by the local government or Financial Services Commission. The two proceedings run on independent timelines and require separate responses.

Q. Can I still be prosecuted if the borrower agreed to the high interest rate in writing?

A. Yes. Because the interest rate ceiling is a mandatory statutory limit, a borrower's written consent to a rate above the cap does not make the arrangement lawful, and the excess interest agreement is void as a matter of civil law as well.

Q. What happens to loan agreements that violate the interest rate cap?

A. The portion of interest exceeding the statutory ceiling is void, and courts have found that repayments already made toward the excess interest can, in some circumstances, be treated as repayment of principal rather than valid interest. This civil consequence is separate from any criminal penalty.

Q. Will registration revocation end my ability to operate at all?

A. Revocation of lending business registration generally bars the operator from re-registering for a set period and often disqualifies related executives as well, so contesting the administrative decision at an early stage can be important if the business is intended to continue.

Q. How is the amount of illegal interest calculated for sentencing purposes?

A. Courts typically look at the total amount collected in excess of the legal ceiling across all affected borrowers, factoring in disguised fees added to the loan. This calculation often becomes a central point of dispute and can meaningfully affect the sentencing outcome.

Q. Should I speak with the police before consulting a lawyer?

A. Because the distinction between an isolated personal loan and an unregistered lending business often turns on how the facts are first presented, it is advisable to review the transaction history and prepare a consistent account with a lawyer before any police interview.

Official References

개인정보처리방침

법무법인 프런티어(이하 “사무소”)는 개인정보보호법에 따라 정보주체의 개인정보 및 권익을 보호하고 개인정보와 관련된 정보주체의 고충을 신속하고 원활하게 처리하기 위하여 본 개인정보 처리방침을 수립·공개합니다.

제 1 조 수집하는 개인정보의 항목, 목적, 방법
제 2 조 개인정보의 처리 및 보유기간
제 3 조 개인정보의 제3자 제공
제 4 조 개인정보 처리업무의 위탁
제 5 조 정보주체의 권리·의무 및 그 행사방법
제 6 조 개인정보의 파기
제 7 조 의견수렴 및 불만처리
제 8 조 개인정보 처리방침의 변경
제 9 조 개인정보의 안전성 확보 조치

제 1 조 (수집하는 개인정보의 항목, 목적, 방법)
① 게시판 글 작성 시 필수 항목에 대한 수집목적은 ‘별도의 구체적 상담을 위하여’이며 수집항목은 ‘이름, 이메일, 연락처’입니다.
② 전항 외에 고객의 서비스 이용 과정이나 요청 사항 처리 과정에서 ‘IP주소, 접속로그, 단말기 및 환경정보, 서비스 이용기록, 쿠키’와 같은 정보들이 자동으로 수집 및 저장될 수 있으며, 이 때의 수집목적은 ‘사용자 홈페이지 이용, 사이트 이용에 대한 문의 민원 등 고객 고충 처리’입니다.
③ 사무소는 ‘홈페이지 고객 문의/고충 처리 시 전화 또는 인터넷을 통한 상담’과 같은 방법으로 개인정보를 수집합니다

제 2 조 (개인정보의 처리 및 보유기간)
관계법령의 규정에 따라 개인정보를 보존하여야 하는 의무가 있는 경우가 아닌 한, 정보주체의 개인정보는 원칙적으로 해당 개인정보의 처리목적이 달성될 때까지 보유 및 이용되며, 그 목적이 달성되면 지체 없이 파기됩니다.

제 3 조 (개인정보의 제3자 제공)
사무소는 정보주체의 개인정보를 본 처리방침에서 명시한 목적에 한해서만 처리하며 정보주체의 사전동의가 있는 경우 또는 개인정보보호법 등 관계법령의 규정에 의거한 경우에만 개인정보를 제3자에게 제공합니다. 사무소는 현재 개인정보를 제3자에게 제공하지 않고 있습니다.

제 4 조 (개인정보 처리업무의 위탁)
사무소는 현재 귀하의 개인정보 보호를 위해 귀하의 개인정보를 직접 취급 관리하고 있습니다. 단, 향후 보다 전문적인 서비스를 제공하기 위하여 제3의 전문기관에 귀하의 정보를 위탁할 필요가 있다고 판단되는 경우, 귀하의 사전 동의 하에 개인정보에 대한 취급을 위탁할 수 있습니다.

제 5 조 (정보주체의 권리·의무 및 그 행사방법)
① 정보주체는 개인정보보호법 등 관계법령이 정하는 바에 따라 사무소에 대해 개인정보의 열람, 정정 및 삭제, 처리정지 요구 등 개인정보 보호 관련 권리를 행사할 수 있습니다.
② 제1항에 따른 권리행사는 정보주체의 법정대리인이나 위임을 받은 사람을 통해서도 할 수 있습니다. 다만, 이 경우에는 개인정보보호법 시행규칙에 따른 위임장을 사무소에 제출하여야 합니다.
③ 사무소는 정보주체의 권리행사에 대하여 개인정보보호법 등 관계법령이 정하는 바에 따라 지체 없이 조치하겠습니다.

제 6 조 (개인정보의 파기)
① 사무소는 원칙적으로 개인정보의 처리목적이 달성된 경우 등 그 개인정보가 불필요하게 되었을 때에는 지체 없이 해당 개인정보를 파기합니다.
② 사무소가 관계법령의 규정에 따라 개인정보를 파기하지 아니하고 보존하여야 하는 경우에는 해당 개인정보 또는 개인정보파일을 다른 개인정보와 분리해서 저장·관리 합니다.
③ 사무소는 파기사유가 발생한 개인정보를 선정하여 개인정보 보호책임자의 승인을 받아 해당 개인정보를 파기합니다.
④ 사무소는 파기하여야 할 개인정보가 전자적 파일 형태인 경우 복원이 불가능한 방법으로 영구 삭제하며, 이외의 기록물, 인쇄물, 서면, 그 밖의 기록매체인 경우 파쇄 또는 소각합니다.

제 7 조 (의견수렴 및 불만처리)
정보주체는 개인정보 보호 관련 문의, 불만처리, 피해구제 등에 관한 사항을 아래 개인정보 보호책임자 또는 담당부서에 문의하실 수 있습니다. 사무소는 정보주체의 문의에 대하여 신속하고 충분한 답변을 드릴 것입니다.

개인정보 보호 책임자 : 변호사
연락처 : 02.

제 8 조 (개인정보 처리방침의 변경)
사무소의 개인정보 처리방침은 관련 법령, 지침 및 사무소 내부규정에 따라 변경될 수 있으며, 개인정보 처리방침이 변경되는 경우 관련 법령이 정하는 방법에 따라 공개합니다.

제 9 조 (개인정보의 안전성 확보 조치)
사무소는 개인정보의 안전성 확보를 위해 다음과 같은 조치를 취하고 있습니다.
관리적 조치 : 내부관리계획의 수립 및 시행, 구성원에 대한 정기적인 개인정보 보호교육 등
기술적 조치 : 개인정보처리시스템 등의 접근권한 관리, 접근통제시스템 설치, 고유식별정보 등의 암호화, 보안프로그램의 설치 등
물리적 조치 : 전산실, 자료보관실 등 개인정보 보관장소에 대한 접근통제