법무법인 프런티어
12 Grave Negligence Traffic Offenses Lawyer
12 Grave Negligence Traffic Offenses Lawyer | What every at-fault driver needs to understand first
The Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (교통사고처리특례법) normally lets an at-fault driver avoid prosecution if the victim doesn't want punishment or the driver carries valid insurance (교통사고처리특례법 제3조 제2항). But for 12 specific types of grave negligence — signal violations, crosswalk accidents, drunk driving, and others — this protection does not apply, and the driver can be prosecuted even with full insurance and even if the victim forgives them (교통사고처리특례법 제3조 제2항 단서). On top of the criminal case, a separate administrative process under the Road Traffic Act can suspend or revoke your driver's license. These two tracks run independently, so a favorable outcome in one does not automatically fix the other.
12 Grave Negligence Traffic Offenses | The 12 Categories of Grave Negligence
Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (교통사고처리특례법 제3조 제2항 단서) lists 12 specific circumstances where the usual insurance/settlement defense does not apply. If your accident falls under any of these, prosecution can proceed regardless of insurance status or the victim's wishes.
Running a red light, ignoring a stop sign, or crossing over the center line into oncoming traffic are treated as inherently dangerous conduct. Whether the signal was actually red at the moment of impact, or whether crossing was involuntary (e.g., to avoid a sudden obstacle), is frequently disputed using black box and CCTV footage.
Exceeding the posted speed limit by 20km/h or more at the time of the accident triggers this category. The actual speed is usually reconstructed from black box data, skid marks, or National Forensic Service analysis, and disputing the calculated speed is a common defense angle.
This covers overtaking in a no-passing zone or violating lane-change methods set by the Road Traffic Act. Whether the maneuver itself, rather than the other driver's sudden movement, actually caused the accident is often the central issue.
Passing through a railroad crossing without stopping or while the barrier is down falls here. These cases are relatively rare but carry a similar structure of dispute over whether the safety measures were clearly perceivable.
Striking a pedestrian who is crossing, or beginning to cross, within a marked crosswalk is one of the most frequently prosecuted categories. Whether the pedestrian had actually entered the crosswalk, and whether the pedestrian signal was in the driver's favor, are the key facts.
Driving without a valid license, or while under the influence of alcohol or drugs to the point that safe driving is impaired, both qualify. A DUI blood alcohol level also separately triggers penalties under the Road Traffic Act (도로교통법 제44조), so this often becomes a dual-track case.
Driving onto a sidewalk and injuring a pedestrian there, or causing injury by improperly opening a vehicle door while it is being boarded or alighted, are both included.
Accidents in designated child protection zones (school zones) and failure to ensure passenger safety, such as improper securing in a moving vehicle, round out the list. School zone cases can also trigger enhanced sentencing under the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment of Specific Crimes (특정범죄 가중처�벌 등에 관한 법률).
Even outside these 12 categories, this doesn't mean automatic exoneration
If the accident does not fall into any of the 12 categories, the driver may still avoid prosecution when the victim does not wish to press charges or the driver carries valid insurance (교통사고처리특례법 제3조 제2항). However, in cases causing death, or where the driver fled the scene without providing aid (violation of duty under 도로교통법 제54조), prosecution can proceed regardless of these 12 categories. Each case needs to be checked against both the general rule and its exceptions.
12 Grave Negligence Traffic Offenses | How Criminal Exposure Actually Plays Out
Being charged under one of the 12 categories does not automatically mean a harsh sentence, but it does mean the case proceeds through the criminal justice system rather than being closed early. Understanding the realistic range of outcomes helps set expectations from the start.
Prosecution track: summary order vs. formal indictment
Most first-time offenders in less severe cases (e.g., minor injury from a signal violation) are processed by summary order (약식명령), which typically results in a fine without a court appearance. More serious cases — death, repeat offenses, or combination with DUI — are more likely to proceed to formal trial (정식기소), which carries the possibility of imprisonment under Article 268 of the Criminal Act (형법 제268조) for causing death or injury through negligence in the course of an occupation.
Why a written apology and settlement still matter
Even though the victim's wish for leniency cannot stop prosecution under the 12 categories, an early written settlement or expression of forgiveness from the victim remains one of the most significant sentencing factors considered by prosecutors and judges (형법 제51조, general sentencing factors). Documenting sincere efforts to compensate the victim, separate from insurance payouts, is often the single most effective thing a driver can do.
Aggravating and mitigating facts specific to your category
The specific category matters for how the case is argued. A crosswalk case turns heavily on pedestrian signal timing and the pedestrian's visibility, while a DUI case turns on the measured blood alcohol concentration and how it was obtained. Building the defense around the facts unique to your specific category, rather than treating all 12 the same, tends to produce a more accurate risk assessment.
12 Grave Negligence Traffic Offenses | License Suspension, Revocation, and Relief Options
Separately from the criminal case, the police and the Korean National Police Agency's driver's license authority run their own point-based administrative process under the Road Traffic Act. This can result in suspension or revocation of your license even before, or regardless of, how the criminal case ends.
How points accumulate for 12-category accidents
Causing injury or death, combined with the fault-finding for the specific violation (e.g., signal violation, DUI), generates points under the administrative point system established under the Road Traffic Act (도로교통법) and its enforcement rules. Reaching certain point thresholds within a set period triggers automatic suspension, and higher thresholds trigger revocation.
Filing an administrative appeal or objection (이의신청/행정심판)
A driver who disputes the suspension or revocation decision can file an objection with the police agency or pursue an administrative appeal (행정심판) before the relevant committee, and in more serious cases an administrative litigation (행정소송) challenging the disposition. These procedures have their own short deadlines, so acting quickly after receiving the notice matters.
Relief for drivers who depend on their license for work
Where license revocation would eliminate a driver's livelihood (e.g., commercial drivers, delivery workers), some relief is available through a hardship exception review process, though this depends heavily on the specific violation category — DUI cases, for example, face much stricter thresholds for relief than a simple signal violation.
12 Grave Negligence Traffic Offenses | What Insurance Does and Doesn't Cover Here
A common misconception is that having full comprehensive auto insurance eliminates all risk in a 12-category accident. Insurance affects civil compensation to the victim, but it has a much more limited effect on the criminal case once one of the 12 categories applies.
Civil compensation still proceeds through the insurer
Regardless of criminal outcome, the insurer typically handles compensation negotiations with the victim for medical expenses, lost income, and pain and suffering. This process runs on its own timeline and settlement standards, separate from the criminal case.
Why the insurance defense doesn't apply to the 12 categories
Normally, having entered into a comprehensive insurance contract that fully covers the damages allows the case to be closed without prosecution (교통사고처리특례법 제4조 제1항). But this defense is expressly excluded for the 12 categories listed in Article 3(2) (교통사고처리특례법 제4조 제1항 단서), meaning the insurance payment itself becomes largely irrelevant to whether you get prosecuted.
Recovering from a DUI or unlicensed-driving insurance exclusion
Some policies allow the insurer to seek reimbursement from the driver personally (구상권 청구) in DUI or unlicensed-driving cases, since these are often excluded from standard coverage terms. Reviewing the specific policy terms early helps the driver anticipate this separate financial exposure.
12 Grave Negligence Traffic Offenses | From the Accident Report to Case Resolution
Police collect black box footage, CCTV, witness statements, and issue a preliminary fault assessment. What you say at this stage in your statement is frequently referenced later, so early legal input matters.
The case file moves to the prosecutor's office, which decides whether to pursue summary order, formal indictment, or in rare cases non-prosecution if a statutory exception applies despite the initial 12-category flag.
Independently, the police licensing division calculates points and issues a suspension/revocation notice. This can arrive before the criminal case concludes and has its own appeal deadline.
Whether through the insurer or directly, working toward a written settlement or statement of non-objection from the victim is pursued in parallel, since it affects sentencing even though it cannot block prosecution outright.
The criminal case concludes with a fine, suspended sentence, or in more serious cases imprisonment, while the administrative appeal (if filed) proceeds on its own track toward a final decision on the license.
12 Grave Negligence Traffic Offenses | How Fees Are Typically Set
Usually set based on whether the case is expected to proceed by summary order or full trial, and whether an administrative license appeal is being handled alongside the criminal case. A combined criminal + administrative engagement is typically priced as a package rather than two separate full fees.
If used, this is generally tied to concrete outcomes such as securing non-prosecution, a reduced charge, a suspended sentence instead of imprisonment, or successfully overturning a license suspension/revocation on appeal.
Filing an objection or administrative appeal against a license disposition, and if necessary an administrative litigation, involves separate procedural fees and, for litigation, court filing costs distinct from the criminal defense fee.
Costs such as obtaining accident reconstruction reports, expert opinions on speed or signal timing, and copies of the case file are billed separately as they are incurred.
※ Costs vary depending on case complexity and specific circumstances; exact fees will be provided during consultation. No specific outcome is guaranteed.
12 Grave Negligence Traffic Offenses | Self-Check Before Your Consultation
1️⃣ Does your accident actually fall under one of the 12 categories?
- Was the traffic signal or stop sign clearly in effect at the moment of the accident, based on black box or CCTV footage?
- Was the pedestrian already inside the marked crosswalk boundary, or just approaching it?
- Was your measured speed at the time of impact actually 20km/h or more above the posted limit?
- Did the accident occur within a designated child protection zone (school zone) during restricted hours?
- Was there any drug or alcohol influence, and if so, how was the measurement taken and recorded?
2️⃣ Criminal case status check
- Have you already given a statement to police, and do you remember exactly what you said?
- Has the case been referred to the prosecutor's office yet, or is it still under police investigation?
- Have you received any written notice of summary order, or a summons for questioning or trial?
- Have you attempted to contact the victim, and if so, is there any written record of that contact?
3️⃣ License / administrative status check
- Have you received a notice of license suspension or revocation from the police licensing division?
- Do you know the exact deadline stated on that notice for filing an objection or appeal?
- Does your job or livelihood depend directly on holding a valid driver's license?
- Have prior violations added points to your license within the relevant look-back period?
4️⃣ Insurance and civil compensation check
- Does your insurance policy exclude coverage for DUI or unlicensed driving, and have you reviewed those exclusion clauses?
- Has your insurer already opened a claim with the victim, and do you know the current settlement status?
- Have you been notified of a possible indemnity claim (구상권) from your own insurer?
Frequently Asked Questions
Official References
개인정보처리방침
제 1 조 수집하는 개인정보의 항목, 목적, 방법
제 2 조 개인정보의 처리 및 보유기간
제 3 조 개인정보의 제3자 제공
제 4 조 개인정보 처리업무의 위탁
제 5 조 정보주체의 권리·의무 및 그 행사방법
제 6 조 개인정보의 파기
제 7 조 의견수렴 및 불만처리
제 8 조 개인정보 처리방침의 변경
제 9 조 개인정보의 안전성 확보 조치
제 1 조 (수집하는 개인정보의 항목, 목적, 방법)
① 게시판 글 작성 시 필수 항목에 대한 수집목적은 ‘별도의 구체적 상담을 위하여’이며 수집항목은 ‘이름, 이메일, 연락처’입니다.
② 전항 외에 고객의 서비스 이용 과정이나 요청 사항 처리 과정에서 ‘IP주소, 접속로그, 단말기 및 환경정보, 서비스 이용기록, 쿠키’와 같은 정보들이 자동으로 수집 및 저장될 수 있으며, 이 때의 수집목적은 ‘사용자 홈페이지 이용, 사이트 이용에 대한 문의 민원 등 고객 고충 처리’입니다.
③ 사무소는 ‘홈페이지 고객 문의/고충 처리 시 전화 또는 인터넷을 통한 상담’과 같은 방법으로 개인정보를 수집합니다
제 2 조 (개인정보의 처리 및 보유기간)
관계법령의 규정에 따라 개인정보를 보존하여야 하는 의무가 있는 경우가 아닌 한, 정보주체의 개인정보는 원칙적으로 해당 개인정보의 처리목적이 달성될 때까지 보유 및 이용되며, 그 목적이 달성되면 지체 없이 파기됩니다.
제 3 조 (개인정보의 제3자 제공)
사무소는 정보주체의 개인정보를 본 처리방침에서 명시한 목적에 한해서만 처리하며 정보주체의 사전동의가 있는 경우 또는 개인정보보호법 등 관계법령의 규정에 의거한 경우에만 개인정보를 제3자에게 제공합니다. 사무소는 현재 개인정보를 제3자에게 제공하지 않고 있습니다.
제 4 조 (개인정보 처리업무의 위탁)
사무소는 현재 귀하의 개인정보 보호를 위해 귀하의 개인정보를 직접 취급 관리하고 있습니다. 단, 향후 보다 전문적인 서비스를 제공하기 위하여 제3의 전문기관에 귀하의 정보를 위탁할 필요가 있다고 판단되는 경우, 귀하의 사전 동의 하에 개인정보에 대한 취급을 위탁할 수 있습니다.
제 5 조 (정보주체의 권리·의무 및 그 행사방법)
① 정보주체는 개인정보보호법 등 관계법령이 정하는 바에 따라 사무소에 대해 개인정보의 열람, 정정 및 삭제, 처리정지 요구 등 개인정보 보호 관련 권리를 행사할 수 있습니다.
② 제1항에 따른 권리행사는 정보주체의 법정대리인이나 위임을 받은 사람을 통해서도 할 수 있습니다. 다만, 이 경우에는 개인정보보호법 시행규칙에 따른 위임장을 사무소에 제출하여야 합니다.
③ 사무소는 정보주체의 권리행사에 대하여 개인정보보호법 등 관계법령이 정하는 바에 따라 지체 없이 조치하겠습니다.
제 6 조 (개인정보의 파기)
① 사무소는 원칙적으로 개인정보의 처리목적이 달성된 경우 등 그 개인정보가 불필요하게 되었을 때에는 지체 없이 해당 개인정보를 파기합니다.
② 사무소가 관계법령의 규정에 따라 개인정보를 파기하지 아니하고 보존하여야 하는 경우에는 해당 개인정보 또는 개인정보파일을 다른 개인정보와 분리해서 저장·관리 합니다.
③ 사무소는 파기사유가 발생한 개인정보를 선정하여 개인정보 보호책임자의 승인을 받아 해당 개인정보를 파기합니다.
④ 사무소는 파기하여야 할 개인정보가 전자적 파일 형태인 경우 복원이 불가능한 방법으로 영구 삭제하며, 이외의 기록물, 인쇄물, 서면, 그 밖의 기록매체인 경우 파쇄 또는 소각합니다.
제 7 조 (의견수렴 및 불만처리)
정보주체는 개인정보 보호 관련 문의, 불만처리, 피해구제 등에 관한 사항을 아래 개인정보 보호책임자 또는 담당부서에 문의하실 수 있습니다. 사무소는 정보주체의 문의에 대하여 신속하고 충분한 답변을 드릴 것입니다.
개인정보 보호 책임자 : 변호사
연락처 : 02.
제 8 조 (개인정보 처리방침의 변경)
사무소의 개인정보 처리방침은 관련 법령, 지침 및 사무소 내부규정에 따라 변경될 수 있으며, 개인정보 처리방침이 변경되는 경우 관련 법령이 정하는 방법에 따라 공개합니다.
제 9 조 (개인정보의 안전성 확보 조치)
사무소는 개인정보의 안전성 확보를 위해 다음과 같은 조치를 취하고 있습니다.
관리적 조치 : 내부관리계획의 수립 및 시행, 구성원에 대한 정기적인 개인정보 보호교육 등
기술적 조치 : 개인정보처리시스템 등의 접근권한 관리, 접근통제시스템 설치, 고유식별정보 등의 암호화, 보안프로그램의 설치 등
물리적 조치 : 전산실, 자료보관실 등 개인정보 보관장소에 대한 접근통제