법무법인 프런티어
Hospital Business Suspension Lawyer
Hospital Business Suspension Lawyer | Fighting the order before it shuts your doors
A hospital business suspension order is an administrative sanction imposed by the health authority under the Medical Service Act (의료법) or National Health Insurance Act (국민건강보험법) when a medical institution is found to have violated billing rules, employed unlicensed staff, engaged in illegal patient solicitation, or committed other regulatory violations. The order can range from a few days to months of full closure, and in serious or repeated cases can lead to license revocation. Because the suspension takes effect once notified — often before any court reviews it — the real battle is usually about timing: whether you can obtain a stay of execution and whether the underlying violation and penalty level can later be reduced or reversed.
Hospital Business Suspension | Three ways to respond to a suspension order
Depending on timing and the nature of the violation, an institution can pursue an administrative appeal, an administrative litigation, or request that the suspension be converted into a monetary penalty. These paths are not mutually exclusive and are often pursued together with a stay of execution.
| Filing deadline | Within 90 days of receiving the order |
| Typical duration | Roughly 1-3 months |
| Stay available | Yes, can be requested alongside the appeal |
| Outcome scope | Cancel, reduce, or uphold the order |
Governed by the Administrative Appeals Act (행정심판법 제27조, 제30조); often faster than litigation but the commission's decision can still be challenged further in court.
| Filing deadline | Within 90 days of the order or appeal decision |
| Typical duration | 6 months to over a year |
| Stay available | Yes, filed as a separate motion |
| Outcome scope | Full or partial cancellation of the order |
Brought under the Administrative Litigation Act (행정소송법 제20조, 제23조); allows deeper fact-finding but takes longer, which is why the stay of execution matters most here.
| Filing deadline | Typically before the suspension period begins |
| Typical duration | Decided alongside the original case |
| Stay available | Not applicable, replaces the closure itself |
| Outcome scope | Business continues, fine paid instead |
Available in some circumstances under the Medical Service Act's substitute penalty provisions when closure would severely disrupt patient care; not every violation qualifies.
Hospital Business Suspension | What triggers a business suspension order
Health authorities issue suspension orders under specific statutory grounds. The exact ground cited determines both the suspension period under the enforcement rules and what defenses are available.
Overbilling the National Health Insurance Service, billing for services not actually rendered, or splitting bills to increase reimbursement can result in a suspension of up to one year (의료법 제66조). The health authority typically relies on the results of an on-site inspection or a health insurance review, so the accuracy of that underlying fact-finding is often the real point of dispute.
Allowing non-medical staff to perform medical procedures, or having a physician who is not properly registered perform treatment, is treated as a serious violation because it directly implicates patient safety (의료법 제27조, 제66조). Suspension periods here tend to be longer, and repeat violations can escalate to revocation.
Paying brokers to refer patients, or offering illegal rebates, is prohibited (의료법 제27조 제3항) and commonly triggers suspension when discovered through investigation of a referral network rather than the clinic itself. Because these cases often start with someone else's criminal case, the hospital may first learn of the issue through a prosecutor's referral to the health authority.
The National Health Insurance Service and local government can jointly conduct on-site investigations, and findings from these audits (국민건강보험법 제98조) are frequently the evidentiary basis for a suspension order. Institutions are entitled to submit an opinion during the investigation, and failing to do so effectively at that stage weakens later legal challenges.
Where a prior suspension or warning exists, the enforcement rules generally provide for aggravated penalties for a second or third violation within a set period. This is one of the most common reasons an otherwise moderate violation results in an unexpectedly long suspension or outright revocation.
What is often overlooked
Many suspension orders are technically valid but disproportionately severe given the actual harm caused, the institution's compliance history, or mitigating circumstances such as voluntary correction before the order was issued. Whether the health authority properly exercised its discretion in setting the suspension period is frequently as important a question as whether the violation itself occurred.
Hospital Business Suspension | Why the stay of execution decides everything else
Because a suspension order takes legal effect once notified, filing an appeal or lawsuit alone does not stop the clock. Without a separate stay, the hospital may already be closed by the time a court or the appeals commission rules on the merits.
What has to be shown to obtain a stay
The institution generally must show that enforcing the order now would cause damage that is difficult to recover from later, that there is urgency, and that the stay would not seriously harm the public interest (행정소송법 제23조 제2항, 제3항). For a hospital, evidence about disrupted ongoing treatment for existing patients, employee income loss, and difficulty resuming operations after closure is often central to this showing.
Timing is the practical constraint
Because the suspension period usually starts on a fixed date stated in the order, the stay motion needs to be filed and, ideally, decided before that date. Waiting until close to the effective date significantly narrows the available options, since courts and the appeals commission need time to review the request.
A stay does not resolve the underlying case
Even where a stay is granted, it only pauses enforcement while the appeal or litigation is pending — it does not decide whether the violation occurred or whether the penalty period was appropriate. The institution still needs to build its substantive defense on the merits during that window.
⚠ The order is not automatically paused by appeal or litigation
Under Korean administrative law, filing an appeal or lawsuit does not by itself suspend the effect of the order (행정심판법 제30조 제1항, 행정소송법 제23조 제1항). A separate motion for a stay of execution must be filed and granted for the suspension to be paused while the case proceeds.
Hospital Business Suspension | When suspension can be converted into a fine instead
Because closing a hospital, even briefly, can seriously disrupt patient care, the Medical Service Act allows certain suspension penalties to be replaced with a monetary fine in defined circumstances. This substitution does not apply automatically and is not available for every type of violation.
Which violations are eligible
The substitute penalty option generally applies to violations tied to National Health Insurance Service billing issues rather than to violations involving patient safety, such as unlicensed practice, where the health authority is less likely to allow the business to keep operating. The eligibility criteria and calculation method are set out in the Medical Service Act and its enforcement decree.
How the substitute fine amount is calculated
The amount is generally tied to the length of the suspension period that would otherwise apply and the institution's scale, meaning a longer suspension converts into a correspondingly larger fine. Institutions sometimes underestimate this amount, so getting an accurate calculation before deciding whether to request substitution matters.
Applying for substitution is itself a discretionary request
Requesting substitution requires an affirmative application to the health authority, and the authority retains discretion to grant or deny it based on the severity and nature of the violation. Building the request around continuity-of-care concerns for existing patients, rather than purely the institution's financial interest, tends to be more persuasive.
Hospital Business Suspension | From receiving the notice to resolving the case
As soon as a prior notice of disposition or the final order is received, the underlying inspection report, billing records, and any statement of opinion submitted earlier need to be reviewed together to identify factual and legal weaknesses in the health authority's case.
If the suspension is set to begin soon, a stay of execution is filed alongside or immediately before the appeal or lawsuit so that the business can continue operating while the case is reviewed.
Depending on the facts and the urgency, the case proceeds either through an administrative appeal to the relevant appeals commission, directly to administrative litigation in court, or both in sequence, while also evaluating whether penalty substitution is available.
This stage involves challenging the factual findings of the inspection, arguing procedural defects in how the order was issued, or arguing that the suspension period imposed exceeds what the enforcement rules and the principle of proportionality allow.
The case ends with a decision reducing, cancelling, or upholding the order, or with the health authority accepting a request for penalty substitution, after which the institution should also review whether internal compliance changes are needed to avoid recurrence.
Hospital Business Suspension | How fees are typically structured
Usually set based on the complexity of the case, including whether both a stay of execution and the main appeal or litigation need to be filed, and whether multiple violations are involved.
Because this is often filed urgently and separately from the main case, some firms charge a distinct fee for the stay motion in addition to the retainer for the underlying appeal or litigation.
If applicable, typically structured around the outcome achieved, such as a reduced suspension period, full cancellation of the order, or approval of penalty substitution, rather than a fixed percentage.
Court filing fees, document acquisition costs, and expert opinions (for example, on the accuracy of billing calculations) are billed separately as actual costs incurred.
※ Costs vary depending on case complexity and specific circumstances; exact fees will be provided during consultation. No specific outcome is guaranteed.
Hospital Business Suspension | Self-Check Before You Call
1️⃣ Confirm the timeline
- Have you confirmed the exact date the suspension is set to take effect?
- Has more than 90 days passed since you received the order or a prior notice?
- Have you kept written proof of when the order was actually delivered to your institution?
2️⃣ Assess the underlying violation
- Was the finding based on an on-site inspection, and did you receive a copy of that report?
- Did you submit a written opinion during the investigation stage, and if so, what did it say?
- Is this a first violation, or does your institution have a prior suspension or warning on record?
3️⃣ Evaluate stay of execution eligibility
- Can you document concrete harm to existing patients if the hospital closes on schedule?
- Do you have evidence of financial or staffing damage that would be hard to reverse later?
- Is the suspension period long enough that even a short delay in enforcement matters?
4️⃣ Consider penalty substitution
- Is the violation related to billing rather than patient safety or unlicensed practice?
- Would continuing operations meaningfully protect ongoing patient care?
- Have you calculated roughly what a substitute fine might cost compared to lost revenue during suspension?
Frequently Asked Questions
Official References
개인정보처리방침
제 1 조 수집하는 개인정보의 항목, 목적, 방법
제 2 조 개인정보의 처리 및 보유기간
제 3 조 개인정보의 제3자 제공
제 4 조 개인정보 처리업무의 위탁
제 5 조 정보주체의 권리·의무 및 그 행사방법
제 6 조 개인정보의 파기
제 7 조 의견수렴 및 불만처리
제 8 조 개인정보 처리방침의 변경
제 9 조 개인정보의 안전성 확보 조치
제 1 조 (수집하는 개인정보의 항목, 목적, 방법)
① 게시판 글 작성 시 필수 항목에 대한 수집목적은 ‘별도의 구체적 상담을 위하여’이며 수집항목은 ‘이름, 이메일, 연락처’입니다.
② 전항 외에 고객의 서비스 이용 과정이나 요청 사항 처리 과정에서 ‘IP주소, 접속로그, 단말기 및 환경정보, 서비스 이용기록, 쿠키’와 같은 정보들이 자동으로 수집 및 저장될 수 있으며, 이 때의 수집목적은 ‘사용자 홈페이지 이용, 사이트 이용에 대한 문의 민원 등 고객 고충 처리’입니다.
③ 사무소는 ‘홈페이지 고객 문의/고충 처리 시 전화 또는 인터넷을 통한 상담’과 같은 방법으로 개인정보를 수집합니다
제 2 조 (개인정보의 처리 및 보유기간)
관계법령의 규정에 따라 개인정보를 보존하여야 하는 의무가 있는 경우가 아닌 한, 정보주체의 개인정보는 원칙적으로 해당 개인정보의 처리목적이 달성될 때까지 보유 및 이용되며, 그 목적이 달성되면 지체 없이 파기됩니다.
제 3 조 (개인정보의 제3자 제공)
사무소는 정보주체의 개인정보를 본 처리방침에서 명시한 목적에 한해서만 처리하며 정보주체의 사전동의가 있는 경우 또는 개인정보보호법 등 관계법령의 규정에 의거한 경우에만 개인정보를 제3자에게 제공합니다. 사무소는 현재 개인정보를 제3자에게 제공하지 않고 있습니다.
제 4 조 (개인정보 처리업무의 위탁)
사무소는 현재 귀하의 개인정보 보호를 위해 귀하의 개인정보를 직접 취급 관리하고 있습니다. 단, 향후 보다 전문적인 서비스를 제공하기 위하여 제3의 전문기관에 귀하의 정보를 위탁할 필요가 있다고 판단되는 경우, 귀하의 사전 동의 하에 개인정보에 대한 취급을 위탁할 수 있습니다.
제 5 조 (정보주체의 권리·의무 및 그 행사방법)
① 정보주체는 개인정보보호법 등 관계법령이 정하는 바에 따라 사무소에 대해 개인정보의 열람, 정정 및 삭제, 처리정지 요구 등 개인정보 보호 관련 권리를 행사할 수 있습니다.
② 제1항에 따른 권리행사는 정보주체의 법정대리인이나 위임을 받은 사람을 통해서도 할 수 있습니다. 다만, 이 경우에는 개인정보보호법 시행규칙에 따른 위임장을 사무소에 제출하여야 합니다.
③ 사무소는 정보주체의 권리행사에 대하여 개인정보보호법 등 관계법령이 정하는 바에 따라 지체 없이 조치하겠습니다.
제 6 조 (개인정보의 파기)
① 사무소는 원칙적으로 개인정보의 처리목적이 달성된 경우 등 그 개인정보가 불필요하게 되었을 때에는 지체 없이 해당 개인정보를 파기합니다.
② 사무소가 관계법령의 규정에 따라 개인정보를 파기하지 아니하고 보존하여야 하는 경우에는 해당 개인정보 또는 개인정보파일을 다른 개인정보와 분리해서 저장·관리 합니다.
③ 사무소는 파기사유가 발생한 개인정보를 선정하여 개인정보 보호책임자의 승인을 받아 해당 개인정보를 파기합니다.
④ 사무소는 파기하여야 할 개인정보가 전자적 파일 형태인 경우 복원이 불가능한 방법으로 영구 삭제하며, 이외의 기록물, 인쇄물, 서면, 그 밖의 기록매체인 경우 파쇄 또는 소각합니다.
제 7 조 (의견수렴 및 불만처리)
정보주체는 개인정보 보호 관련 문의, 불만처리, 피해구제 등에 관한 사항을 아래 개인정보 보호책임자 또는 담당부서에 문의하실 수 있습니다. 사무소는 정보주체의 문의에 대하여 신속하고 충분한 답변을 드릴 것입니다.
개인정보 보호 책임자 : 변호사
연락처 : 02.
제 8 조 (개인정보 처리방침의 변경)
사무소의 개인정보 처리방침은 관련 법령, 지침 및 사무소 내부규정에 따라 변경될 수 있으며, 개인정보 처리방침이 변경되는 경우 관련 법령이 정하는 방법에 따라 공개합니다.
제 9 조 (개인정보의 안전성 확보 조치)
사무소는 개인정보의 안전성 확보를 위해 다음과 같은 조치를 취하고 있습니다.
관리적 조치 : 내부관리계획의 수립 및 시행, 구성원에 대한 정기적인 개인정보 보호교육 등
기술적 조치 : 개인정보처리시스템 등의 접근권한 관리, 접근통제시스템 설치, 고유식별정보 등의 암호화, 보안프로그램의 설치 등
물리적 조치 : 전산실, 자료보관실 등 개인정보 보관장소에 대한 접근통제