Physician License Suspension/Revocation Lawyer | Understanding and Responding to Medical License Disciplinary Action
Summary
A physician's license can be suspended for up to one year or revoked entirely by the Minister of Health and Welfare when specific statutory grounds are met, such as a criminal conviction related to medical practice, unlawful issuance of medical documents, or repeated administrative violations (의료법 제65조, 제66조). Because a suspension or revocation directly ends a physician's ability to earn income from practice, and because these are formal administrative dispositions, they can be challenged through an administrative appeal or administrative litigation before or after the disposition becomes final. The window to act is often short, and how the physician responds during the pre-notice hearing stage frequently determines whether the case ends in a lighter penalty or full revocation.
Administrative · Medical LawRelated law: 의료법Physician's perspectiveLicense defense
Physician License Suspension/Revocation | When Can a Medical License Be Suspended or Revoked?
The Medical Act sets out specific categories of misconduct or disqualification that can trigger suspension (up to 12 months) or revocation of a physician's license. Not every violation automatically leads to revocation - the severity of the disposition depends on the specific ground invoked and the facts of the case.
License Suspension Ground
Violation of Medical Practice Duties
Suspension of up to one year can be ordered for violations such as unauthorized issuance of medical certificates, improper delegation of medical acts to unlicensed persons, or breach of recordkeeping and reporting duties under the Medical Act (의료법 제66조 제1항). These cases often turn on whether the conduct was a technical lapse or a deliberate violation, which affects the length of suspension imposed.
License Suspension Ground
Excessive or Improper Fee Charging
Charging fees beyond what is permitted, or engaging in unauthorized advertising of medical services, can also result in a suspension. Because these violations are often documented through billing records, the physician's response typically focuses on context and whether the conduct was isolated or systemic.
License Revocation Ground
Criminal Conviction Related to Medical Practice
A license can be revoked where a physician is convicted of a crime committed in connection with medical practice and sentenced to imprisonment, with the sentence becoming final (의료법 제65조 제1항 제1호). The key issue is often whether the underlying criminal case can still be appealed or whether the conviction itself can be challenged before the administrative disposition becomes final.
License Revocation Ground
Loss of Qualification Under Article 8
A license must be revoked if the physician falls under one of the general disqualification grounds in Article 8 of the Medical Act, such as certain mental health conditions, drug or alcohol dependency findings, or specific criminal convictions listed in that provision (의료법 제8조, 제65조 제1항). These cases sometimes hinge on medical or factual evidence about whether the disqualifying condition still exists.
License Revocation Ground
Repeated Suspensions
A license can be revoked where a physician receives multiple suspension dispositions within a certain period, even if each individual violation was relatively minor (의료법 제65조 제1항 제4호). This makes it important to challenge or mitigate even a first suspension, since it can affect future dispositions.
License Revocation Ground
Lending or Improper Use of License
Allowing another person to practice medicine using your license, or receiving compensation for lending your name to a medical institution you do not actually operate, is treated as a serious violation that frequently results in revocation rather than suspension.
One Violation Can Trigger Multiple Grounds
In practice, a single incident - for example, a botched procedure followed by falsified records - can be charged under more than one ground simultaneously, which increases the risk of revocation rather than mere suspension. Reviewing exactly which provision the Ministry of Health and Welfare is relying on, and whether all elements of that provision are actually met, is often the first and most important step in the case.
Physician License Suspension/Revocation | How the Disciplinary Process Actually Unfolds
Most physicians first learn about a potential disciplinary action either through a criminal case notification, a patient or institution complaint filed with local government, or a routine inspection. Understanding the sequence of steps helps identify where intervention is most effective.
Referral and Fact-Finding Stage
Complaints or referrals are typically first reviewed by the relevant local government (city or provincial health department) or the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service before being forwarded to the Ministry of Health and Welfare. At this stage, physicians are sometimes asked to submit a written explanation or attend an interview, and what is said here can shape the entire case going forward.
Prior Notice and Opportunity to Present Opinion
Before issuing a disposition that restricts rights, an administrative agency must give prior notice of the intended disposition and provide an opportunity for the party to state their opinion (행정절차법 제21조, 제22조). For a license suspension or revocation, this often takes the form of a written notice specifying the grounds relied upon, followed by a hearing or written submission period.
Issuance of the Disposition
If the Ministry proceeds, it issues a formal written disposition specifying the type of penalty (suspension period or revocation), the legal grounds, and the effective date. This document is what triggers the clock for any appeal.
Administrative Appeal or Litigation
A physician who disagrees with the disposition can file an administrative appeal with the Central Administrative Appeals Commission within 90 days of receiving notice of the disposition, or file administrative litigation directly with the court (행정심판법 제27조, 행정소송법 제20조). In urgent cases, a request to suspend execution of the disposition can be filed alongside the appeal so the license does not go into effect while the case is being reviewed.
Physician License Suspension/Revocation | Building a Defense from the Physician's Side
Because these cases involve both medical judgment and administrative law, an effective defense usually combines a review of the clinical facts with arguments about how the disposition was reached procedurally.
Challenging Whether the Statutory Ground Is Actually Met
Many disputes turn on whether the physician's conduct actually falls within the specific wording of the ground cited by the Ministry - for example, whether a document was truly 'falsified' as opposed to containing an honest clerical error. Careful comparison of the facts against the statutory language can sometimes eliminate the more serious ground and leave only a lesser violation.
Arguing Disproportionality (Abuse of Discretion)
Even where a violation occurred, courts can annul or reduce a disposition if the penalty imposed is grossly disproportionate to the seriousness of the violation, applying the general principle against abuse of administrative discretion. Factors such as the physician's disciplinary history, the harm actually caused to patients, and whether the violation was intentional or negligent are typically weighed here.
Procedural Defects in How the Disposition Was Issued
If the Ministry failed to provide adequate prior notice, did not properly state the reasons for the disposition, or denied a meaningful opportunity to be heard, the disposition itself can be challenged on procedural grounds regardless of the underlying facts (행정절차법 제23조). This is often reviewed early because a procedural defect can sometimes resolve a case without needing to relitigate the medical facts.
Coordinating with a Parallel Criminal Case
Where the disciplinary action stems from an ongoing or completed criminal case, the strategy in the criminal proceeding - such as seeking a reduced sentence, a suspended sentence, or an acquittal - directly affects the administrative outcome, since revocation under Article 65 often depends on a finalized prison sentence. Coordinating both cases together, rather than treating them separately, is usually necessary.
⚠ The 90-Day Appeal Window Is Strict
An administrative appeal generally must be filed within 90 days of receiving notice of the disposition (행정심판법 제27조 제1항), and administrative litigation has its own filing deadline as well. Missing this window can mean losing the ability to challenge the disposition even if there were strong grounds to contest it.
Physician License Suspension/Revocation | From First Notice to Resolution
1
Initial Consultation and Document Review Review the complaint, inspection report, or criminal case file together with any notice already received from the Ministry of Health and Welfare or local health authority to identify which statutory ground is being relied upon.
2
Response During Prior Notice Period Prepare a written opinion or attend a hearing during the opportunity-to-be-heard stage, presenting mitigating facts and legal arguments before the disposition is finalized.
3
Review of the Formal Disposition Once the written disposition is issued, assess whether to pursue an administrative appeal, administrative litigation, or both, and whether a stay of execution is needed to keep practicing while the case proceeds.
4
Filing and Litigating the Appeal Submit the appeal or complaint with supporting evidence, respond to the agency's counterarguments, and, if necessary, proceed through hearings or oral argument before the Commission or court.
5
Resolution The case concludes with a decision upholding, reducing, or annulling the disposition; if litigation is unsuccessful, further appeal to a higher court may be available depending on the circumstances.
Physician License Suspension/Revocation | How Legal Fees Are Typically Structured
Retainer Fee Calculated based on the complexity of the case, including whether it involves a parallel criminal matter, the number of grounds cited in the disposition, and whether a stay of execution must be filed urgently.
Success Fee May be structured around the outcome achieved, such as a reduction from revocation to suspension, or a reduction in the suspension period, rather than a guaranteed result.
Administrative Appeal vs. Litigation Costs Filing an administrative appeal with the Central Administrative Appeals Commission generally involves lower costs than administrative litigation in court, so the choice between the two affects the overall fee estimate.
Stay of Execution Costs Where the license would otherwise be suspended or revoked immediately, an emergency motion to stay execution is often filed separately and may involve an additional fee given the time pressure involved.
Disbursements Includes costs such as document certification, expert opinions on medical practice standards where relevant, and court or Commission filing fees.
※ Costs vary depending on case complexity and specific circumstances; exact fees will be provided during consultation. No specific outcome is guaranteed.
Physician License Suspension/Revocation | Self-Check for Physicians Facing Disciplinary Action
1️⃣ Understand What Stage You're At
Have you received a written notice of intended disposition, or only an informal inquiry so far?
Does the notice specify which article of the Medical Act is being relied upon?
Has a deadline been given for submitting a written opinion or attending a hearing?
Is there a parallel criminal case connected to the same facts?
2️⃣ Assess the Deadline Risk
If a formal disposition has already been issued, do you know the exact date you received it?
Are you within 90 days of that notice for filing an administrative appeal?
Does your practice or employment depend on avoiding an immediate suspension, such that a stay of execution should be considered?
3️⃣ Gather Supporting Facts
Do you have documentation contradicting or contextualizing the alleged violation, such as medical records or billing logs?
Is there evidence of your prior disciplinary history (or lack thereof) that could support a proportionality argument?
If the case stems from a criminal conviction, has that conviction become final, or is it still under appeal?
4️⃣ Consider Practical Impact
Would a suspension affect ongoing patient care obligations or hospital employment contracts?
Have you notified your medical institution or insurer as required, if applicable?
Are there licensing consequences in other jurisdictions or specialty boards that could be triggered by this disposition?
Frequently Asked Questions
Q. Can I keep practicing while my administrative appeal is pending?
A. Filing an administrative appeal or lawsuit does not automatically stop the disposition from taking effect. You generally need to file a separate request for a stay of execution, and the agency or court will decide whether the suspension is paused while the case is reviewed (행정심판법 제30조, 행정소송법 제23조).
Q. What is the difference between an administrative appeal and administrative litigation?
A. An administrative appeal is reviewed by the Central Administrative Appeals Commission, an executive body, and is generally faster and less costly. Administrative litigation is filed in court and can be pursued either after an unfavorable appeal decision or directly, though it typically takes longer (행정심판법, 행정소송법).
Q. If my criminal case ends in a suspended sentence, will my license still be revoked?
A. Revocation under Article 65 of the Medical Act generally requires a final sentence of imprisonment for a crime related to medical practice; a suspended sentence structure can affect whether this specific revocation ground applies, though the facts of each case matter. This is one reason coordinating the criminal defense with the administrative response is important.
Q. How long does a license suspension typically last?
A. The Medical Act allows suspension for up to 12 months, but the actual length depends on the specific violation and any aggravating or mitigating factors considered by the Ministry (의료법 제66조 제1항). Internal guidelines used by the Ministry often set a baseline period that can be adjusted based on the circumstances.
Q. Can a revoked license ever be reinstated?
A. The Medical Act provides a process for reapplying for a license after revocation, subject to certain waiting periods and conditions depending on the ground for revocation. Whether reinstatement is realistic depends heavily on the specific ground cited in the original revocation.
Q. What happens if I ignore the notice and don't respond?
A. Failing to submit a written opinion or attend the hearing during the prior notice period does not stop the disposition process - the Ministry can proceed to issue the disposition based on the information already available. This often results in a less favorable outcome than if mitigating facts had been presented.
Q. Does a patient complaint alone lead to license suspension?
A. Not necessarily. A complaint typically triggers an investigation, but a disposition requires the Ministry to establish that a specific statutory ground under the Medical Act is actually met. Many complaints do not result in any formal disciplinary action after review.
Q. Will this affect my specialty board certification or hospital privileges separately?
A. A Ministry disposition against your medical license is a separate matter from board certification bodies or individual hospital credentialing committees, but many institutions have their own rules that reference license status. It is worth reviewing your institution's bylaws or employment contract alongside the administrative case.
Q. Should I hire a lawyer for the prior notice hearing, or only if a formal disposition is issued?
A. The opportunity to present your opinion before the disposition is issued is often the most effective stage to influence the outcome, since it is easier to prevent a severe disposition than to overturn one after the fact. Many physicians find it useful to have legal input at this earlier stage rather than waiting.
Q. Can I request a lesser penalty even if I admit the violation occurred?
A. Yes. Even where the underlying facts are not seriously in dispute, arguments can still be made regarding the proportionality of the specific penalty imposed, such as requesting a shorter suspension instead of revocation, based on mitigating circumstances and prior disciplinary record.
법무법인 프런티어(이하 “사무소”)는 개인정보보호법에 따라 정보주체의 개인정보 및 권익을 보호하고 개인정보와 관련된 정보주체의 고충을 신속하고 원활하게 처리하기 위하여 본 개인정보 처리방침을 수립·공개합니다.
제 1 조 수집하는 개인정보의 항목, 목적, 방법
제 2 조 개인정보의 처리 및 보유기간
제 3 조 개인정보의 제3자 제공
제 4 조 개인정보 처리업무의 위탁
제 5 조 정보주체의 권리·의무 및 그 행사방법
제 6 조 개인정보의 파기
제 7 조 의견수렴 및 불만처리
제 8 조 개인정보 처리방침의 변경
제 9 조 개인정보의 안전성 확보 조치
제 1 조 (수집하는 개인정보의 항목, 목적, 방법)
① 게시판 글 작성 시 필수 항목에 대한 수집목적은 ‘별도의 구체적 상담을 위하여’이며 수집항목은 ‘이름, 이메일, 연락처’입니다.
② 전항 외에 고객의 서비스 이용 과정이나 요청 사항 처리 과정에서 ‘IP주소, 접속로그, 단말기 및 환경정보, 서비스 이용기록, 쿠키’와 같은 정보들이 자동으로 수집 및 저장될 수 있으며, 이 때의 수집목적은 ‘사용자 홈페이지 이용, 사이트 이용에 대한 문의 민원 등 고객 고충 처리’입니다.
③ 사무소는 ‘홈페이지 고객 문의/고충 처리 시 전화 또는 인터넷을 통한 상담’과 같은 방법으로 개인정보를 수집합니다
제 2 조 (개인정보의 처리 및 보유기간)
관계법령의 규정에 따라 개인정보를 보존하여야 하는 의무가 있는 경우가 아닌 한, 정보주체의 개인정보는 원칙적으로 해당 개인정보의 처리목적이 달성될 때까지 보유 및 이용되며, 그 목적이 달성되면 지체 없이 파기됩니다.
제 3 조 (개인정보의 제3자 제공)
사무소는 정보주체의 개인정보를 본 처리방침에서 명시한 목적에 한해서만 처리하며 정보주체의 사전동의가 있는 경우 또는 개인정보보호법 등 관계법령의 규정에 의거한 경우에만 개인정보를 제3자에게 제공합니다. 사무소는 현재 개인정보를 제3자에게 제공하지 않고 있습니다.
제 4 조 (개인정보 처리업무의 위탁)
사무소는 현재 귀하의 개인정보 보호를 위해 귀하의 개인정보를 직접 취급 관리하고 있습니다. 단, 향후 보다 전문적인 서비스를 제공하기 위하여 제3의 전문기관에 귀하의 정보를 위탁할 필요가 있다고 판단되는 경우, 귀하의 사전 동의 하에 개인정보에 대한 취급을 위탁할 수 있습니다.
제 5 조 (정보주체의 권리·의무 및 그 행사방법)
① 정보주체는 개인정보보호법 등 관계법령이 정하는 바에 따라 사무소에 대해 개인정보의 열람, 정정 및 삭제, 처리정지 요구 등 개인정보 보호 관련 권리를 행사할 수 있습니다.
② 제1항에 따른 권리행사는 정보주체의 법정대리인이나 위임을 받은 사람을 통해서도 할 수 있습니다. 다만, 이 경우에는 개인정보보호법 시행규칙에 따른 위임장을 사무소에 제출하여야 합니다.
③ 사무소는 정보주체의 권리행사에 대하여 개인정보보호법 등 관계법령이 정하는 바에 따라 지체 없이 조치하겠습니다.
제 6 조 (개인정보의 파기)
① 사무소는 원칙적으로 개인정보의 처리목적이 달성된 경우 등 그 개인정보가 불필요하게 되었을 때에는 지체 없이 해당 개인정보를 파기합니다.
② 사무소가 관계법령의 규정에 따라 개인정보를 파기하지 아니하고 보존하여야 하는 경우에는 해당 개인정보 또는 개인정보파일을 다른 개인정보와 분리해서 저장·관리 합니다.
③ 사무소는 파기사유가 발생한 개인정보를 선정하여 개인정보 보호책임자의 승인을 받아 해당 개인정보를 파기합니다.
④ 사무소는 파기하여야 할 개인정보가 전자적 파일 형태인 경우 복원이 불가능한 방법으로 영구 삭제하며, 이외의 기록물, 인쇄물, 서면, 그 밖의 기록매체인 경우 파쇄 또는 소각합니다.
제 7 조 (의견수렴 및 불만처리)
정보주체는 개인정보 보호 관련 문의, 불만처리, 피해구제 등에 관한 사항을 아래 개인정보 보호책임자 또는 담당부서에 문의하실 수 있습니다. 사무소는 정보주체의 문의에 대하여 신속하고 충분한 답변을 드릴 것입니다.
개인정보 보호 책임자 : 변호사
연락처 : 02.
제 8 조 (개인정보 처리방침의 변경)
사무소의 개인정보 처리방침은 관련 법령, 지침 및 사무소 내부규정에 따라 변경될 수 있으며, 개인정보 처리방침이 변경되는 경우 관련 법령이 정하는 방법에 따라 공개합니다.
제 9 조 (개인정보의 안전성 확보 조치)
사무소는 개인정보의 안전성 확보를 위해 다음과 같은 조치를 취하고 있습니다.
관리적 조치 : 내부관리계획의 수립 및 시행, 구성원에 대한 정기적인 개인정보 보호교육 등
기술적 조치 : 개인정보처리시스템 등의 접근권한 관리, 접근통제시스템 설치, 고유식별정보 등의 암호화, 보안프로그램의 설치 등
물리적 조치 : 전산실, 자료보관실 등 개인정보 보관장소에 대한 접근통제