Criminal Defense

Military Criminal Act Lawyer

Military Criminal Act Lawyer | What to expect when a military criminal case is opened against you

Summary

The Military Criminal Act (군형법) creates offenses that exist only within the military — such as desertion, insubordination, violence against a superior or subordinate, and dereliction of duty — on top of ordinary crimes that soldiers can also be charged with under general law. Since the 2021 reform, most Military Criminal Act cases involving active-duty soldiers are now investigated and prosecuted mainly through military police and military prosecutors, but tried before ordinary civilian district courts rather than military courts, except for offenses committed during wartime or specific categories still handled by court-martial. Because command influence, unit reporting duties, and disciplinary action often run in parallel with the criminal case, a person under investigation needs to understand both tracks from the outset.

Criminal · Military Applicable law: 군형법 Applicable law: 군사법원법

Military Criminal Act | What counts as a Military Criminal Act offense

Not every crime committed by a soldier falls under military-specific law. The Military Criminal Act adds a category of offenses defined by military status and duty, separate from crimes under the general Criminal Act that soldiers can also commit.

Art. 30

Desertion (도망)
Leaving one's post or unit without authorization, or failing to return within a set period, can be charged as desertion. The dividing line between a disciplinary AWOL matter and a criminal desertion charge often turns on duration and intent, which is frequently disputed.

Art. 44-64

Offenses against superiors and command duty
Assault, threats, or insulting language directed at a superior officer or NCO carry heavier penalties than the equivalent civilian offense because of the added duty of command respect. Conversely, abuse of subordinates by a superior is charged separately and has become a heavily enforced category in recent years.

Art. 47-48

Dereliction and abandonment of duty
Failing to perform an assigned duty, sleeping on guard duty, or abandoning a post are treated as military offenses precisely because the harm is defined by the military context rather than by any private victim.

General law + status

General crimes committed by military personnel
Theft, fraud, drug offenses, or traffic accidents committed by a soldier are usually still prosecuted under the ordinary Criminal Act, but the fact that the accused is on active duty affects who investigates the case and which court has jurisdiction.

Jurisdiction reform since 2021

Following amendments to the Military Court Act (군사법원법), most cases of violent crime, sex crimes, and death occurring among active-duty soldiers during peacetime are now transferred to civilian prosecutors and civilian district courts, while investigation may still begin with military police or a military prosecutor. This split jurisdiction is one of the most misunderstood aspects of a modern military criminal case.

Military Criminal Act | How military procedure differs from a civilian criminal case

The biggest shock for most first-time clients is realizing that the chain of command is part of the legal process, not just a workplace hierarchy.

Investigation starts inside the unit

A case typically opens when a commanding officer files a report or military police (군사경찰) begin an inquiry, often before the service member has any chance to consult counsel. Unlike a civilian suspect who is usually contacted directly by police, a soldier may be summoned through the unit's own reporting chain, which can affect how voluntarily any early statement is treated later.

Military prosecutor vs civilian prosecutor

Since the 2021 reform of the Military Court Act (군사법원법), a military prosecutor (군검사) still leads the investigation for most offenses under the Military Criminal Act (군형법), but indictment for serious offenses such as death, sexual offenses, or crimes committed off-base is transferred to a civilian prosecutor. Knowing which office actually holds the file changes what motions and requests are realistic at each stage.

Detention and confinement conditions differ

A service member placed under emergency arrest or pretrial detention is typically held in a military detention facility rather than a police station holding cell, and unit commanders retain some administrative authority over the person even while a criminal case is pending. This dual track between disciplinary measures and the criminal case is something a civilian defendant never has to navigate.

Military Criminal Act | Charges that come up most often in practice

Certain offense categories recur constantly in military criminal cases and each raises a distinct factual dispute.

AWOL that becomes desertion

Whether an unauthorized absence is treated as a minor disciplinary infraction or prosecuted as desertion under the Military Criminal Act (군형법 제30조) depends heavily on the length of absence and evidence of intent to permanently evade duty. Documenting the reason for the absence — medical, family emergency, mental health crisis — early on is often decisive.

Violence and bullying between service members

Cases involving assault, verbal abuse, or hazing among soldiers of different rank frequently turn on whether the conduct was a one-off incident or part of a pattern, and whether it is treated as a violation of the Act on the Prevention of Military Human Rights Abuses (군인의 지위 및 복무에 관한 기본법) in addition to the Military Criminal Act. Witness statements from other unit members are usually the central evidence.

Sexual offenses within a unit

Sex crime allegations involving military personnel are now generally prosecuted by civilian prosecutors and tried in civilian district courts rather than court-martial, following the 2021 reform, precisely because of concerns about command influence in past cases. The evidentiary standards, however, still track the general Sexual Violence Punishment Act, not a separate military standard.

Military Criminal Act | When a court-martial still applies

Court-martial jurisdiction has narrowed considerably but has not disappeared, and understanding when it still applies matters for defense strategy.

Wartime and overseas deployment cases

Offenses committed during wartime, martial law, or while deployed outside Korean territory generally remain within court-martial jurisdiction under the Military Court Act (군사법원법), reflecting the practical reality that a civilian court cannot easily convene at a deployed location.

Purely military-status offenses

Offenses that only make sense in a military context — desertion, insubordination, dereliction of guard duty — generally continue to be tried by court-martial even in peacetime, since these offenses have no civilian equivalent for a civilian court to apply.

Composition of the court-martial panel

A court-martial panel is composed differently from a civilian bench, and the accused's access to civilian defense counsel alongside any assigned military defense counsel is a right that should be exercised early, since the two roles can advocate differently depending on institutional pressures.

Military Criminal Act | From unit report to case resolution

Initial report and military police inquiry
A commanding officer report or a complaint triggers a preliminary inquiry, often including an initial statement taken from the service member before legal counsel is retained.

Retaining defense counsel and reviewing the case file
Once retained, counsel requests access to the investigation record and advises on how to handle any further summons, including whether to exercise the right to remain silent on specific points.

Military or civilian prosecutor's decision
Depending on the offense category, either a military prosecutor or a civilian prosecutor decides whether to indict, seek a summary disposition, or close the case without charge; this is the stage where a written opinion from defense counsel can carry the most weight.

Trial before court-martial or civilian district court
Jurisdiction determines the forum; either way, the trial addresses the same core issues — whether the charged conduct is proven and how it should be sentenced under the Military Criminal Act (군형법) or general Criminal Act.

Sentencing and parallel disciplinary action
A criminal disposition, even a suspended sentence, can trigger separate administrative discharge or disciplinary proceedings within the unit, so post-verdict planning should address both tracks together.

Military Criminal Act | How defense fees are structured

Retainer (착수금)
Set according to the stage at which the case is retained — before any summons, during the investigation stage, or after indictment — and the severity of the charge, since court-martial and civilian court cases require different amounts of preparation.

Success fee (성공보수)
If agreed, typically tied to a specific favorable outcome such as a non-indictment decision, a summary disposition instead of formal trial, or a more favorable sentence, and is discussed and fixed in the engagement agreement rather than promised in advance.

Disbursements (실비)
Covers travel to the base or military court where the case is pending, document copying, and any expert opinion sought for issues such as psychiatric evaluation in AWOL-related cases.

Parallel administrative matters
If a discharge review board or disciplinary committee hearing runs alongside the criminal case, representation for that separate proceeding is generally quoted and billed separately from the criminal defense retainer.

※ Costs vary depending on case complexity and specific circumstances; exact fees will be provided during consultation. No specific outcome is guaranteed.

Military Criminal Act | Self-Check Before Your First Consultation

1️⃣ Right After Being Summoned

Have you been asked to sign a written statement before speaking to a lawyer?
Do you know whether this is a disciplinary interview or a criminal investigation?
Has anyone in your chain of command pressured you about the outcome?
Do you have a copy or record of the summons and the specific allegation?

2️⃣ AWOL / Desertion Cases

How many days have passed since you left your post or failed to return?
Do you have documentation for the reason of your absence (medical, family, mental health)?
Did you make any attempt to contact your unit during the absence?
Has your unit already filed a formal desertion report?

3️⃣ Violence or Insubordination Cases

Was there a witness present, and have they given a statement?
Is this being treated as a single incident or part of an ongoing pattern?
Have you been asked to write a statement of apology or reflection (반성문) already?
Could a separate human-rights or bullying complaint be filed alongside the criminal case?

4️⃣ Jurisdiction Check

Did the alleged offense occur during deployment, martial law, or overseas duty?
Is the charge one that exists only under military law (desertion, insubordination) or also under general criminal law?
Has the case file been transferred to a civilian prosecutor, or is a military prosecutor still handling it?
Do you know whether your trial forum will be a court-martial or a civilian district court?

5️⃣ Parallel Consequences

Could this case result in involuntary discharge or reassignment regardless of the criminal outcome?
Is a disciplinary committee hearing already scheduled separately from the criminal case?
Have you discussed with counsel how a suspended sentence could affect your service record?

Frequently Asked Questions

Q. Will my case go to court-martial or a civilian court?

A. Since the 2021 reform of the Military Court Act (군사법원법), most violent crimes, sex offenses, and cases involving death among active-duty soldiers during peacetime are tried in civilian district courts, while offenses that only exist under military law, such as desertion or insubordination, generally remain with court-martial. Wartime, martial law, and overseas deployment offenses also generally stay under court-martial jurisdiction.

Q. Can I refuse to give a statement to my unit before I speak to a lawyer?

A. You have the right to remain silent under the Constitution and this applies in a military investigation as well, but in practice unit-level reporting pressure can make refusal feel difficult. It is worth discussing with counsel in advance what, if anything, to say if summoned before representation is arranged.

Q. How is AWOL different from desertion under the Military Criminal Act?

A. An unauthorized absence can be treated administratively as a minor infraction, but once it crosses a certain duration or shows evidence of intent to permanently evade duty, it can be charged as desertion under the Military Criminal Act (군형법 제30조). The specific facts around the reason for the absence and any attempt to return are usually the central issue in these cases.

Q. Can I hire a civilian lawyer instead of relying on assigned military defense counsel?

A. Yes, a service member may retain a private defense attorney in addition to, or instead of, assigned military counsel, and doing so does not require special permission from the command. Many clients choose private counsel specifically because of concerns about institutional pressure within the assigned counsel system.

Q. Will a criminal case affect my discharge or military record separately from any sentence?

A. Yes, a criminal disposition can trigger a separate administrative process such as involuntary discharge review or a disciplinary committee hearing, and these proceedings run on their own track even if the criminal case results in a suspended sentence or fine. It is generally advisable to address both the criminal case and any administrative consequence in a coordinated way rather than treating them as unrelated.

Q. What happens if the victim is also a service member in my unit?

A. When both the accused and the alleged victim are within the same unit, commanders often have reporting duties that can accelerate the investigation, and continued contact between the parties inside the unit can itself become an issue, for example if it is perceived as retaliation. Reassignment or separation within the unit is sometimes requested or ordered while the case is pending.

Q. Does a suspended sentence still count as a criminal record for a soldier?

A. A suspended sentence is still a criminal conviction and is recorded as such, and it can have downstream effects on service record, promotion eligibility, and post-discharge employment depending on the specific offense. This is a common point of confusion, since some clients assume a suspended sentence has no lasting consequence.

Q. Can a case be resolved without going to trial at all?

A. Depending on the offense and the prosecutor's assessment, a case may be closed without indictment or resolved through a summary disposition rather than a full trial, particularly for less serious dereliction or minor unauthorized absence cases. Whether this is realistic depends heavily on the specific facts and any prior disciplinary history.

Q. How long does a typical military criminal investigation take?

A. Timelines vary widely depending on whether the case stays with a military prosecutor or is transferred to a civilian prosecutor, and whether additional witness statements from other unit members are needed. Cases involving transfer between military and civilian jurisdiction can take longer simply because of the handoff between offices.

Official References

개인정보처리방침

법무법인 프런티어(이하 “사무소”)는 개인정보보호법에 따라 정보주체의 개인정보 및 권익을 보호하고 개인정보와 관련된 정보주체의 고충을 신속하고 원활하게 처리하기 위하여 본 개인정보 처리방침을 수립·공개합니다.

제 1 조 수집하는 개인정보의 항목, 목적, 방법
제 2 조 개인정보의 처리 및 보유기간
제 3 조 개인정보의 제3자 제공
제 4 조 개인정보 처리업무의 위탁
제 5 조 정보주체의 권리·의무 및 그 행사방법
제 6 조 개인정보의 파기
제 7 조 의견수렴 및 불만처리
제 8 조 개인정보 처리방침의 변경
제 9 조 개인정보의 안전성 확보 조치

제 1 조 (수집하는 개인정보의 항목, 목적, 방법)
① 게시판 글 작성 시 필수 항목에 대한 수집목적은 ‘별도의 구체적 상담을 위하여’이며 수집항목은 ‘이름, 이메일, 연락처’입니다.
② 전항 외에 고객의 서비스 이용 과정이나 요청 사항 처리 과정에서 ‘IP주소, 접속로그, 단말기 및 환경정보, 서비스 이용기록, 쿠키’와 같은 정보들이 자동으로 수집 및 저장될 수 있으며, 이 때의 수집목적은 ‘사용자 홈페이지 이용, 사이트 이용에 대한 문의 민원 등 고객 고충 처리’입니다.
③ 사무소는 ‘홈페이지 고객 문의/고충 처리 시 전화 또는 인터넷을 통한 상담’과 같은 방법으로 개인정보를 수집합니다

제 2 조 (개인정보의 처리 및 보유기간)
관계법령의 규정에 따라 개인정보를 보존하여야 하는 의무가 있는 경우가 아닌 한, 정보주체의 개인정보는 원칙적으로 해당 개인정보의 처리목적이 달성될 때까지 보유 및 이용되며, 그 목적이 달성되면 지체 없이 파기됩니다.

제 3 조 (개인정보의 제3자 제공)
사무소는 정보주체의 개인정보를 본 처리방침에서 명시한 목적에 한해서만 처리하며 정보주체의 사전동의가 있는 경우 또는 개인정보보호법 등 관계법령의 규정에 의거한 경우에만 개인정보를 제3자에게 제공합니다. 사무소는 현재 개인정보를 제3자에게 제공하지 않고 있습니다.

제 4 조 (개인정보 처리업무의 위탁)
사무소는 현재 귀하의 개인정보 보호를 위해 귀하의 개인정보를 직접 취급 관리하고 있습니다. 단, 향후 보다 전문적인 서비스를 제공하기 위하여 제3의 전문기관에 귀하의 정보를 위탁할 필요가 있다고 판단되는 경우, 귀하의 사전 동의 하에 개인정보에 대한 취급을 위탁할 수 있습니다.

제 5 조 (정보주체의 권리·의무 및 그 행사방법)
① 정보주체는 개인정보보호법 등 관계법령이 정하는 바에 따라 사무소에 대해 개인정보의 열람, 정정 및 삭제, 처리정지 요구 등 개인정보 보호 관련 권리를 행사할 수 있습니다.
② 제1항에 따른 권리행사는 정보주체의 법정대리인이나 위임을 받은 사람을 통해서도 할 수 있습니다. 다만, 이 경우에는 개인정보보호법 시행규칙에 따른 위임장을 사무소에 제출하여야 합니다.
③ 사무소는 정보주체의 권리행사에 대하여 개인정보보호법 등 관계법령이 정하는 바에 따라 지체 없이 조치하겠습니다.

제 6 조 (개인정보의 파기)
① 사무소는 원칙적으로 개인정보의 처리목적이 달성된 경우 등 그 개인정보가 불필요하게 되었을 때에는 지체 없이 해당 개인정보를 파기합니다.
② 사무소가 관계법령의 규정에 따라 개인정보를 파기하지 아니하고 보존하여야 하는 경우에는 해당 개인정보 또는 개인정보파일을 다른 개인정보와 분리해서 저장·관리 합니다.
③ 사무소는 파기사유가 발생한 개인정보를 선정하여 개인정보 보호책임자의 승인을 받아 해당 개인정보를 파기합니다.
④ 사무소는 파기하여야 할 개인정보가 전자적 파일 형태인 경우 복원이 불가능한 방법으로 영구 삭제하며, 이외의 기록물, 인쇄물, 서면, 그 밖의 기록매체인 경우 파쇄 또는 소각합니다.

제 7 조 (의견수렴 및 불만처리)
정보주체는 개인정보 보호 관련 문의, 불만처리, 피해구제 등에 관한 사항을 아래 개인정보 보호책임자 또는 담당부서에 문의하실 수 있습니다. 사무소는 정보주체의 문의에 대하여 신속하고 충분한 답변을 드릴 것입니다.

개인정보 보호 책임자 : 변호사
연락처 : 02.

제 8 조 (개인정보 처리방침의 변경)
사무소의 개인정보 처리방침은 관련 법령, 지침 및 사무소 내부규정에 따라 변경될 수 있으며, 개인정보 처리방침이 변경되는 경우 관련 법령이 정하는 방법에 따라 공개합니다.

제 9 조 (개인정보의 안전성 확보 조치)
사무소는 개인정보의 안전성 확보를 위해 다음과 같은 조치를 취하고 있습니다.
관리적 조치 : 내부관리계획의 수립 및 시행, 구성원에 대한 정기적인 개인정보 보호교육 등
기술적 조치 : 개인정보처리시스템 등의 접근권한 관리, 접근통제시스템 설치, 고유식별정보 등의 암호화, 보안프로그램의 설치 등
물리적 조치 : 전산실, 자료보관실 등 개인정보 보관장소에 대한 접근통제