법무법인 프런티어
Marriage Nullity Lawsuit Lawyer
Marriage Nullity Lawsuit Lawyer | When a marriage was never legally valid
Under Korean law, a marriage nullity action (혼인무효) is a distinct claim from divorce: it argues that the marriage was void from the moment of registration because the parties never truly agreed to marry, or because it violates a prohibited-relationship rule (민법 제815조). If the court grants the claim, the marriage is treated as if it never legally existed, which affects property, the legitimacy of children, and inheritance rights differently from a divorce judgment. Because the legal consequences are severe and retroactive, courts require clear proof that genuine consent to marry was absent, not merely that the marriage later broke down.
Marriage Nullity Lawsuit | Nullity, Annulment for Cause, and Divorce Are Not the Same
Clients sometimes come in wanting a 'divorce' when what actually happened points to a marriage that was invalid from the start, or the reverse. Which claim applies changes the required proof, the time limit, and the outcome.
| Legal basis | 민법 제815조 |
| Time limit | None (can be raised any time) |
| Effect on marriage | Void from the start (ab initio) |
| Typical ground | No genuine intent to marry, prohibited relation |
A nullity judgment means the marriage registration is corrected as if the marriage never legally took effect (민법 제815조).
| Legal basis | 민법 제816조, 제823조 |
| Time limit | 3 years from discovery (민법 제823조) |
| Effect on marriage | Valid until a court revokes it |
| Typical ground | Fraud, duress, concealment of serious disease |
Unlike nullity, annulment (혼인의 취소) treats the marriage as having existed until the court's revocation judgment (민법 제824조).
| Legal basis | 민법 제834조, 제840조 |
| Time limit | None for filing, but grounds may have their own limits |
| Effect on marriage | Ends a validly existing marriage |
| Typical ground | Adultery, abuse, irretrievable breakdown |
Divorce presumes the marriage was valid; the dispute is about ending it and dividing consequences (민법 제840조).
Marriage Nullity Lawsuit | When Korean Law Treats a Marriage as Void
Article 815 of the Civil Act lists the situations in which a marriage is void, not merely voidable. Courts read these grounds narrowly because declaring a marriage void erases its legal effect from the beginning.
If the parties never actually agreed to become husband and wife — for example, the marriage registration was filed without one party's real consent, or as a sham to obtain a visa or resident status — the marriage can be declared void. Courts examine whether the parties lived together, held a wedding, or intended a shared life, since a marriage registered purely for immigration or other collateral purposes without any intent to form a real marital relationship lacks genuine consent.
Marriages between lineal relatives by blood or marriage in the direct line are void regardless of the parties' wishes, reflecting a public policy against such unions.
This covers certain collateral relatives (such as some cousin relationships) within a prohibited degree of blood relation, even without a direct lineal connection.
Where a former in-law relationship created a prohibited degree of relation that survives even after the earlier marriage ended, a later marriage between those parties can still be void.
What Nullity Does Not Cover
Nullity is not the right claim for a marriage that was validly formed but later fell apart due to infidelity, abuse, or personality conflicts — that is a divorce case (민법 제840조). It is also different from cases where consent was obtained through fraud or concealment of a serious illness, which fall under annulment for cause with its own 3-year time limit (민법 제823조).
Marriage Nullity Lawsuit | Proving There Was No Genuine Intent to Marry
The most litigated issue in nullity cases is not the wording of the statute but the evidence: how do you prove someone never really intended to be married? Courts look at the full picture of the parties' actual life together, or lack of it.
Sham marriages for immigration or residency status
When a marriage registration appears to have been made solely to obtain a visa, F-series residency, or nationality, without the parties ever cohabiting or presenting themselves as a couple, courts have treated this as lacking genuine marital intent and void under 민법 제815조 제1호. Evidence such as separate residences from day one, absence of a wedding ceremony, and lack of any shared finances or social recognition as a couple is central to this claim.
Marriage registered without one party's knowledge or true consent
In some cases, a marriage report is filed at the district office by one party alone, using the other person's documents, without that person ever agreeing to marry. Because 민법 제815조 제1호 requires an actual meeting of minds to marry, this type of registration can be nullified once discovered, and the affected party should also consider whether the registration itself involved forgery that could support a separate criminal complaint.
Distinguishing a troubled marriage from a nonexistent one
A marriage that started with real intent but quickly soured — for instance, the couple lived together briefly before separating — is generally not void; it is a valid marriage that may end in divorce. The key question courts ask is whether the parties intended, at the time of the marriage registration, to form an actual shared married life, not whether the marriage later succeeded.
Marriage Nullity Lawsuit | What Happens Legally Once a Marriage Is Declared Void
Because a nullity judgment treats the marriage as if it never took legal effect, its consequences differ sharply from a divorce judgment on several practical points that clients frequently ask about.
Children born during the void marriage
A child born to parents whose marriage is later declared void is not automatically rendered illegitimate; Korean courts and family registration practice generally protect the child's status, and paternity issues are addressed separately from the nullity judgment itself. Parents should still confirm how the family register will be corrected and consult on custody and child support arrangements.
Property and de facto marital contributions
Because there was no valid marriage, the formal property division framework used in divorce (민법 제839조의2) does not directly apply; instead, contributions made during the relationship are typically resolved through unjust enrichment or quasi-contract theories, which require different proof than a divorce property division claim.
Correcting the family register and prior marital status
Once a nullity judgment becomes final, the parties can apply to correct the family register to remove the marriage record, which matters for anyone who wants to remarry or needs an accurate marital history for immigration, inheritance, or other legal purposes.
Marriage Nullity Lawsuit | From Consultation to Final Judgment
The attorney reviews the marriage registration date, any cohabitation history, immigration or visa records, and communications to assess whether the facts fit a nullity claim rather than divorce or annulment for cause.
Family lawsuits including nullity actions generally go through the Family Court's mediation stage first; if mediation fails or is deemed unsuitable, the case proceeds to litigation.
The complaint sets out the specific ground under 민법 제815조 and attaches supporting evidence such as residency records, absence of a wedding, or documentation showing the registration was made without genuine consent.
The court examines witness testimony, cohabitation records, immigration data, and other objective evidence, since nullity requires proof beyond simple allegations of a failed relationship.
If the court grants the claim, the judgment becomes final after the appeal period runs, and the parties file to correct the family register to reflect that the marriage never had legal effect.
Marriage Nullity Lawsuit | How Fees Are Typically Set for a Nullity Case
Usually set based on case complexity, particularly how much investigation is needed to prove absence of genuine marital intent, and whether the case is contested or unopposed by the other party.
If used, this is typically tied to whether the nullity judgment is granted, and may also depend on any related property or unjust-enrichment claims resolved alongside it.
Includes the court filing fee calculated on the nature of the claim, stamp fees, and service-of-process costs, which are separate from attorney fees.
Cases involving immigration records, cohabitation history, or overseas evidence may require additional costs for document collection, translation, or investigation.
Since most family cases pass through mediation first, there may be modest additional costs tied to that stage before the case proceeds to full litigation, if it does.
※ Costs vary depending on case complexity and specific circumstances; exact fees will be provided during consultation. No specific outcome is guaranteed.
Marriage Nullity Lawsuit | Self-Check Before You File
1️⃣ Is Nullity the Right Claim for You?
- Did you and your spouse ever actually live together or present yourselves publicly as a married couple?
- Was the marriage registered for a purpose other than forming an actual marital relationship, such as a visa or residency status?
- Were you unaware that a marriage registration had been filed using your information?
- Is there a blood or in-law relationship between you and your spouse that might fall within a prohibited degree under 민법 제815조?
2️⃣ Evidence You Should Start Gathering
- Do you have records showing separate residences from the date of marriage registration (utility bills, lease contracts)?
- Are there immigration, visa, or residency application records connected to the marriage?
- Do you have communications (texts, messages) discussing the marriage as one of convenience?
- Can you identify witnesses who can testify about the lack of a wedding ceremony or shared life?
3️⃣ If You Are the One Being Sued for Nullity
- Do you have evidence of cohabitation, a wedding ceremony, or joint finances that shows a genuine marriage?
- Could the claim actually be time-barred or better characterized as an annulment-for-cause or divorce case instead?
- Have you considered how a nullity judgment would affect any children or shared property?
Frequently Asked Questions
Official References
개인정보처리방침
제 1 조 수집하는 개인정보의 항목, 목적, 방법
제 2 조 개인정보의 처리 및 보유기간
제 3 조 개인정보의 제3자 제공
제 4 조 개인정보 처리업무의 위탁
제 5 조 정보주체의 권리·의무 및 그 행사방법
제 6 조 개인정보의 파기
제 7 조 의견수렴 및 불만처리
제 8 조 개인정보 처리방침의 변경
제 9 조 개인정보의 안전성 확보 조치
제 1 조 (수집하는 개인정보의 항목, 목적, 방법)
① 게시판 글 작성 시 필수 항목에 대한 수집목적은 ‘별도의 구체적 상담을 위하여’이며 수집항목은 ‘이름, 이메일, 연락처’입니다.
② 전항 외에 고객의 서비스 이용 과정이나 요청 사항 처리 과정에서 ‘IP주소, 접속로그, 단말기 및 환경정보, 서비스 이용기록, 쿠키’와 같은 정보들이 자동으로 수집 및 저장될 수 있으며, 이 때의 수집목적은 ‘사용자 홈페이지 이용, 사이트 이용에 대한 문의 민원 등 고객 고충 처리’입니다.
③ 사무소는 ‘홈페이지 고객 문의/고충 처리 시 전화 또는 인터넷을 통한 상담’과 같은 방법으로 개인정보를 수집합니다
제 2 조 (개인정보의 처리 및 보유기간)
관계법령의 규정에 따라 개인정보를 보존하여야 하는 의무가 있는 경우가 아닌 한, 정보주체의 개인정보는 원칙적으로 해당 개인정보의 처리목적이 달성될 때까지 보유 및 이용되며, 그 목적이 달성되면 지체 없이 파기됩니다.
제 3 조 (개인정보의 제3자 제공)
사무소는 정보주체의 개인정보를 본 처리방침에서 명시한 목적에 한해서만 처리하며 정보주체의 사전동의가 있는 경우 또는 개인정보보호법 등 관계법령의 규정에 의거한 경우에만 개인정보를 제3자에게 제공합니다. 사무소는 현재 개인정보를 제3자에게 제공하지 않고 있습니다.
제 4 조 (개인정보 처리업무의 위탁)
사무소는 현재 귀하의 개인정보 보호를 위해 귀하의 개인정보를 직접 취급 관리하고 있습니다. 단, 향후 보다 전문적인 서비스를 제공하기 위하여 제3의 전문기관에 귀하의 정보를 위탁할 필요가 있다고 판단되는 경우, 귀하의 사전 동의 하에 개인정보에 대한 취급을 위탁할 수 있습니다.
제 5 조 (정보주체의 권리·의무 및 그 행사방법)
① 정보주체는 개인정보보호법 등 관계법령이 정하는 바에 따라 사무소에 대해 개인정보의 열람, 정정 및 삭제, 처리정지 요구 등 개인정보 보호 관련 권리를 행사할 수 있습니다.
② 제1항에 따른 권리행사는 정보주체의 법정대리인이나 위임을 받은 사람을 통해서도 할 수 있습니다. 다만, 이 경우에는 개인정보보호법 시행규칙에 따른 위임장을 사무소에 제출하여야 합니다.
③ 사무소는 정보주체의 권리행사에 대하여 개인정보보호법 등 관계법령이 정하는 바에 따라 지체 없이 조치하겠습니다.
제 6 조 (개인정보의 파기)
① 사무소는 원칙적으로 개인정보의 처리목적이 달성된 경우 등 그 개인정보가 불필요하게 되었을 때에는 지체 없이 해당 개인정보를 파기합니다.
② 사무소가 관계법령의 규정에 따라 개인정보를 파기하지 아니하고 보존하여야 하는 경우에는 해당 개인정보 또는 개인정보파일을 다른 개인정보와 분리해서 저장·관리 합니다.
③ 사무소는 파기사유가 발생한 개인정보를 선정하여 개인정보 보호책임자의 승인을 받아 해당 개인정보를 파기합니다.
④ 사무소는 파기하여야 할 개인정보가 전자적 파일 형태인 경우 복원이 불가능한 방법으로 영구 삭제하며, 이외의 기록물, 인쇄물, 서면, 그 밖의 기록매체인 경우 파쇄 또는 소각합니다.
제 7 조 (의견수렴 및 불만처리)
정보주체는 개인정보 보호 관련 문의, 불만처리, 피해구제 등에 관한 사항을 아래 개인정보 보호책임자 또는 담당부서에 문의하실 수 있습니다. 사무소는 정보주체의 문의에 대하여 신속하고 충분한 답변을 드릴 것입니다.
개인정보 보호 책임자 : 변호사
연락처 : 02.
제 8 조 (개인정보 처리방침의 변경)
사무소의 개인정보 처리방침은 관련 법령, 지침 및 사무소 내부규정에 따라 변경될 수 있으며, 개인정보 처리방침이 변경되는 경우 관련 법령이 정하는 방법에 따라 공개합니다.
제 9 조 (개인정보의 안전성 확보 조치)
사무소는 개인정보의 안전성 확보를 위해 다음과 같은 조치를 취하고 있습니다.
관리적 조치 : 내부관리계획의 수립 및 시행, 구성원에 대한 정기적인 개인정보 보호교육 등
기술적 조치 : 개인정보처리시스템 등의 접근권한 관리, 접근통제시스템 설치, 고유식별정보 등의 암호화, 보안프로그램의 설치 등
물리적 조치 : 전산실, 자료보관실 등 개인정보 보관장소에 대한 접근통제