Criminal Defense

Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM) Charges Lawyer

Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM) Charges Lawyer | What the law actually punishes at each stage, and how sentencing is decided

Summary

Under the Act on the Protection of Children and Youth against Sexual Abuse, simple possession, distribution/advertising, and production of material depicting a minor in a sexually exploitative manner are treated as legally distinct offenses with different minimum penalties (아동·청소년의 성보호에 관한 법률 제11조). Production carries the harshest floor — a minimum of 5 years' imprisonment with no option for a fine — while possession alone can still result in imprisonment even for a first offense. Courts also routinely order registration of personal information, restriction on employment at institutions involving minors, and in some cases electronic monitoring in addition to the criminal sentence. Because forensic evidence (device images, cloud logs, chat records) usually already exists before the suspect is aware of the investigation, the practical questions center on the scope of what was actually downloaded or shared, and on what mitigating record can realistically be built.

Criminal · Sex Offense Applicable Law: Act on the Protection of Children and Youth against Sexual Abuse Digital Evidence Ancillary Dispositions

Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM) Charges | Possession, Distribution, and Production Are Not the Same Charge

The Act sets a different penalty floor depending on what stage of conduct is alleged. Whether the same set of files is charged as 'possession' or as 'distribution' can depend on details like whether a folder was shared, whether a link was posted, or whether payment changed hands.

Simple Possession

Knowingly possessing, viewing on a screen, or storing CSAM without further distribution

Statutory Penalty	Up to 1 year imprisonment or fine (제11조 제5항)
Typical Trigger	Downloaded files found on personal device or cloud
Fine Available	Yes
First-Offense Reality	Prosecution can still seek imprisonment

Even 'just possession' is a stand-alone crime under 아동·청소년의 성보호에 관한 법률 제11조 제5항, not merely incidental to another charge.

Distribution / Advertising / Public Display

Sharing, uploading, advertising, or making CSAM available to others, with or without payment

Statutory Penalty	3 years to life or 3+ years imprisonment (제11조 제2항·제3항)
Typical Trigger	Group chat sharing, torrent seeding, paid access sites
Fine Available	No — imprisonment only
Aggravating Factor	Scale of distribution, profit motive, number of recipients

Purchasing access to CSAM for value is separately punishable under 제11조 제4항, and operating or advertising a distribution channel is treated more seriously than passive sharing.

Production

Filming, editing, or otherwise creating material depicting a minor in a sexually exploitative manner

Statutory Penalty	Minimum 5 years imprisonment, up to life (제11조 제1항)
Typical Trigger	Coercing or persuading a minor to film, deepfake editing
Fine Available	No — imprisonment only
Aggravating Factor	Coercion, deception, or existing relationship with the minor

제11조 제1항 sets the highest floor in this statute, and courts treat any involvement of an actual minor's coerced participation as a serious aggravating circumstance beyond the base charge.

Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM) Charges | What Actually Moves the Sentence in a CSAM Case

Because the statutory floors are high, most of the real argument in these cases happens over facts that push the case toward the lower or upper end of the applicable range, not over whether the statute applies at all.

How 'Number of Files' and 'Duration' Are Actually Counted

Prosecutors typically charge based on the number of distinct video/image files recovered through forensic analysis of devices and cloud accounts, not the number of times a file was viewed. Duplicate files, thumbnail caches, and browser history entries are frequently disputed as to whether they constitute 'possession' in the legal sense. How this count is challenged at the investigation stage materially affects the charged scope.

Distinguishing Simple Sharing from 'Distribution'

A single act of forwarding a file in a private chat can be charged as distribution under 제11조 제3항 even without any commercial element, because the statute does not require payment or scale. Whether the recipient count was one person or many, and whether the material was posted somewhere accessible to an indefinite audience, are the facts that determine how the prosecution frames the charge.

Deepfake and AI-Generated Material

Since amendments to the Act, material created or edited using a real minor's face through digital manipulation (including deepfake technology) can also fall within the definition of exploitative material and be prosecuted, separate from the general obscenity provisions of the Criminal Act (형법 제244조 관련 규정과 별도로 적용). This is an area where the scope of what counts as 'depicting a person who appears to be a minor' is still actively litigated.

Ancillary Dispositions Beyond the Prison Term

A conviction typically triggers registration of personal information for a set period (신상정보 등록, 아동·청소년의 성보호에 관한 법률 제49조), restriction from working at schools, daycare centers, or other youth-related institutions for a set period, and in some cases an order for attendance at a sex offender treatment program. These dispositions are decided alongside the criminal sentence and can affect employment and residence long after the case ends, so they need to be argued at the same hearing as the main charge, not afterward.

⚠ No Suspended Sentence Below Certain Thresholds in Practice

While not an absolute statutory bar in every case, courts increasingly decline to suspend sentences (집행유예) where the volume of material is large, the victim's age is very young, or there is any element of production or solicitation. Sentencing guidelines from the Sentencing Commission (양형위원회) are a major reference point that should be reviewed early, not after indictment.

Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM) Charges | From Investigation Notice to Final Sentencing

Initial Contact / Search and Seizure
Most cases begin with a police notice to appear, or with an unannounced search and seizure of devices at home or work based on a warrant obtained from prior digital tracing (e.g., cloud provider reports, P2P monitoring). What is seized and how the seizure was executed should be reviewed immediately, since procedural defects can affect admissibility.

Police and Prosecutorial Investigation
The suspect is questioned about the files found, source of acquisition, and whether any sharing occurred. Statements made at this stage are difficult to walk back later, so how questions are answered — and which have a right to remain silent on — matters early, before formal charges are even decided.

Decision to Indict / Summary Indictment Review
The prosecutor decides whether to indict, dismiss, or (rarely, given the statutory floors involved) proceed by summary order. Given that fines are not available for distribution or production, most cases charged at those levels proceed to a full trial rather than summary proceedings.

Trial and Sentencing Arguments
At trial, the disputed issues usually narrow to the scope of the charge (number of files, whether sharing occurred) and sentencing factors (remorse, treatment history, restitution where a specific victim exists, absence of prior record). The court separately determines the ancillary dispositions described above at the same time as the sentence.

Post-Conviction: Appeal and Ancillary Disposition Compliance
If an appeal is pursued, it must generally be filed within 7 days of sentencing for a first-instance criminal judgment; missing this window forfeits the right to appeal. Registration and employment-restriction periods run automatically from the date the judgment becomes final.

Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM) Charges | How Fees Are Set in CSAM Defense Cases

Retainer (착수금)
Set according to the stage at which representation begins (police questioning only, vs. post-indictment trial) and the number of charges involved. A case involving multiple counts or a mix of possession and distribution charges typically requires more preparation time than a single-file possession case.

Success Fee (성공보수)
If used, structured around a defined, objective outcome — such as securing a summary order instead of formal trial, or a fine instead of imprisonment where legally available — rather than any guarantee about the specific sentence length or acquittal.

Disbursements (실비)
Covers costs such as forensic review of seized devices by an outside expert, court filing fees, and document translation if any material or communication is in a foreign language.

Ancillary Disposition Representation
Arguing against or narrowing the scope of personal information registration and employment restriction is often billed as a related but distinct scope of work, since it is argued and decided separately from the main criminal sentence.

※ Costs vary depending on case complexity and specific circumstances; exact fees will be provided during consultation. No specific outcome is guaranteed.

Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM) Charges | Self-Check Before Your First Consultation

1️⃣ If You Received an Investigation Notice

Has a search and seizure already occurred, or is this a voluntary appearance request?
Do you know which specific files or accounts triggered the investigation?
Have you made any statement to police already, in writing or verbally?
Do you have any prior record involving sexual offenses?

2️⃣ If You Are Charged With Possession Only

Were the files found on a personal device, a shared/family device, or cloud storage?
Could any of the files be duplicates, cached thumbnails, or automatically downloaded content?
Is there any evidence the files were ever opened or viewed, versus simply stored?
Have you sought or would you consider counseling or treatment before sentencing?

3️⃣ If Distribution or Sharing Is Alleged

How many people were the files sent or shown to?
Was any payment, request, or advertisement involved?
Was the sharing platform private (one-on-one chat) or more broadly accessible?
Is there a specific identifiable victim, and has restitution or apology been considered?

4️⃣ If Production or a Real Minor's Involvement Is Alleged

Is there any claim of coercion, deception, or an existing relationship with the minor?
Does the case involve deepfake or digitally edited material rather than an original recording?
Have you retained separate counsel for any related charge (e.g., contact-based sexual offense)?

5️⃣ Preparing for Sentencing

Have you gathered documentation of any prior clean record?
Are you prepared to discuss whether you will attend a treatment program voluntarily?
Have you considered the impact of personal information registration on your current job or field of work?

Frequently Asked Questions

Q. Can I get only a fine instead of imprisonment for simple possession?

A. A fine is a legally available option for simple possession under 아동·청소년의 성보호에 관한 법률 제11조 제5항, but whether a court actually imposes a fine rather than a suspended prison term depends on the volume of material, any prior record, and the specific facts of acquisition. For distribution or production charges, the statute does not permit a fine at all.

Q. Does viewing material through a browser without downloading count as possession?

A. Prosecutors have argued that intentionally accessing and viewing material, even via streaming or a browser cache, can constitute possession if the material was knowingly retained in some retrievable form. This is a factually contested area, and how the forensic evidence characterizes browser cache or temporary files is often a key point of dispute.

Q. Is a first-time offender likely to avoid imprisonment?

A. There is no guaranteed outcome, and the absence of a prior record is only one of several factors courts weigh alongside the volume and nature of material, the manner of acquisition, and current sentencing guidance from the Sentencing Commission (양형위원회). Cases involving distribution or any real minor's participation are treated more strictly regardless of prior record.

Q. What is 'personal information registration' and how long does it last?

A. Registration under 아동·청소년의 성보호에 관한 법률 제49조 requires certain personal details to be submitted to police and retained for a statutorily set period depending on the sentence imposed. It is separate from, and in addition to, the criminal sentence, and is decided by the court at the same time as sentencing.

Q. Can charges be reduced if I delete the files before investigators find them?

A. Deleting files after learning of an investigation does not undo the fact of prior possession if forensic recovery is still possible, and in some circumstances can be treated as an attempt to destroy evidence, which is a separate concern. What matters more for the underlying charge is the volume and nature of what existed, not whether it was later deleted.

Q. Does it matter if I did not know the person in the material was a minor?

A. Lack of knowledge of the person's age can be argued as a defense, but courts examine whether a reasonable person could have recognized the depicted person as a minor based on appearance, context, or accompanying descriptions. This is a fact-intensive issue that is usually contested through the specific images or videos at issue rather than a blanket claim of ignorance.

Q. Will I be listed on a public sex offender registry that others can search?

A. Depending on the sentence and case facts, a court may order disclosure (공개) or notification (고지) of certain information to the public or to a limited group such as neighbors and schools, which is legally distinct from and often more consequential than the internal registration requirement discussed above. Whether disclosure or notification is ordered depends on the specific sentence and the nature of the offense.

Q. How long does a typical CSAM case take from investigation to final judgment?

A. Timelines vary widely depending on whether the case involves a single device or a broader distribution network under joint investigation, but a case proceeding through indictment and a first-instance trial commonly takes several months to over a year. Appeals, if pursued, add further time.

Q. Should I get a lawyer before or after the police interview?

A. Retaining counsel before the first formal interview allows preparation of how to respond to specific questions and clarifies which statements carry legal risk, which is difficult to undo once a formal statement has been recorded. Many clients in Seoul first contact a Seoul child sexual exploitation material defense lawyer as soon as they receive a notice to appear, rather than waiting until after the interview.

Q. Can the ancillary employment restriction be shortened or avoided?

A. The employment restriction period under the Act is generally tied to the sentence imposed, so arguments about its scope and duration are effectively made through sentencing arguments at trial rather than through a separate later petition. In some cases, the specific scope of restricted institutions can also be a point of clarification depending on the applicant's occupation.

Official References

개인정보처리방침

법무법인 프런티어(이하 “사무소”)는 개인정보보호법에 따라 정보주체의 개인정보 및 권익을 보호하고 개인정보와 관련된 정보주체의 고충을 신속하고 원활하게 처리하기 위하여 본 개인정보 처리방침을 수립·공개합니다.

제 1 조 수집하는 개인정보의 항목, 목적, 방법
제 2 조 개인정보의 처리 및 보유기간
제 3 조 개인정보의 제3자 제공
제 4 조 개인정보 처리업무의 위탁
제 5 조 정보주체의 권리·의무 및 그 행사방법
제 6 조 개인정보의 파기
제 7 조 의견수렴 및 불만처리
제 8 조 개인정보 처리방침의 변경
제 9 조 개인정보의 안전성 확보 조치

제 1 조 (수집하는 개인정보의 항목, 목적, 방법)
① 게시판 글 작성 시 필수 항목에 대한 수집목적은 ‘별도의 구체적 상담을 위하여’이며 수집항목은 ‘이름, 이메일, 연락처’입니다.
② 전항 외에 고객의 서비스 이용 과정이나 요청 사항 처리 과정에서 ‘IP주소, 접속로그, 단말기 및 환경정보, 서비스 이용기록, 쿠키’와 같은 정보들이 자동으로 수집 및 저장될 수 있으며, 이 때의 수집목적은 ‘사용자 홈페이지 이용, 사이트 이용에 대한 문의 민원 등 고객 고충 처리’입니다.
③ 사무소는 ‘홈페이지 고객 문의/고충 처리 시 전화 또는 인터넷을 통한 상담’과 같은 방법으로 개인정보를 수집합니다

제 2 조 (개인정보의 처리 및 보유기간)
관계법령의 규정에 따라 개인정보를 보존하여야 하는 의무가 있는 경우가 아닌 한, 정보주체의 개인정보는 원칙적으로 해당 개인정보의 처리목적이 달성될 때까지 보유 및 이용되며, 그 목적이 달성되면 지체 없이 파기됩니다.

제 3 조 (개인정보의 제3자 제공)
사무소는 정보주체의 개인정보를 본 처리방침에서 명시한 목적에 한해서만 처리하며 정보주체의 사전동의가 있는 경우 또는 개인정보보호법 등 관계법령의 규정에 의거한 경우에만 개인정보를 제3자에게 제공합니다. 사무소는 현재 개인정보를 제3자에게 제공하지 않고 있습니다.

제 4 조 (개인정보 처리업무의 위탁)
사무소는 현재 귀하의 개인정보 보호를 위해 귀하의 개인정보를 직접 취급 관리하고 있습니다. 단, 향후 보다 전문적인 서비스를 제공하기 위하여 제3의 전문기관에 귀하의 정보를 위탁할 필요가 있다고 판단되는 경우, 귀하의 사전 동의 하에 개인정보에 대한 취급을 위탁할 수 있습니다.

제 5 조 (정보주체의 권리·의무 및 그 행사방법)
① 정보주체는 개인정보보호법 등 관계법령이 정하는 바에 따라 사무소에 대해 개인정보의 열람, 정정 및 삭제, 처리정지 요구 등 개인정보 보호 관련 권리를 행사할 수 있습니다.
② 제1항에 따른 권리행사는 정보주체의 법정대리인이나 위임을 받은 사람을 통해서도 할 수 있습니다. 다만, 이 경우에는 개인정보보호법 시행규칙에 따른 위임장을 사무소에 제출하여야 합니다.
③ 사무소는 정보주체의 권리행사에 대하여 개인정보보호법 등 관계법령이 정하는 바에 따라 지체 없이 조치하겠습니다.

제 6 조 (개인정보의 파기)
① 사무소는 원칙적으로 개인정보의 처리목적이 달성된 경우 등 그 개인정보가 불필요하게 되었을 때에는 지체 없이 해당 개인정보를 파기합니다.
② 사무소가 관계법령의 규정에 따라 개인정보를 파기하지 아니하고 보존하여야 하는 경우에는 해당 개인정보 또는 개인정보파일을 다른 개인정보와 분리해서 저장·관리 합니다.
③ 사무소는 파기사유가 발생한 개인정보를 선정하여 개인정보 보호책임자의 승인을 받아 해당 개인정보를 파기합니다.
④ 사무소는 파기하여야 할 개인정보가 전자적 파일 형태인 경우 복원이 불가능한 방법으로 영구 삭제하며, 이외의 기록물, 인쇄물, 서면, 그 밖의 기록매체인 경우 파쇄 또는 소각합니다.

제 7 조 (의견수렴 및 불만처리)
정보주체는 개인정보 보호 관련 문의, 불만처리, 피해구제 등에 관한 사항을 아래 개인정보 보호책임자 또는 담당부서에 문의하실 수 있습니다. 사무소는 정보주체의 문의에 대하여 신속하고 충분한 답변을 드릴 것입니다.

개인정보 보호 책임자 : 변호사
연락처 : 02.

제 8 조 (개인정보 처리방침의 변경)
사무소의 개인정보 처리방침은 관련 법령, 지침 및 사무소 내부규정에 따라 변경될 수 있으며, 개인정보 처리방침이 변경되는 경우 관련 법령이 정하는 방법에 따라 공개합니다.

제 9 조 (개인정보의 안전성 확보 조치)
사무소는 개인정보의 안전성 확보를 위해 다음과 같은 조치를 취하고 있습니다.
관리적 조치 : 내부관리계획의 수립 및 시행, 구성원에 대한 정기적인 개인정보 보호교육 등
기술적 조치 : 개인정보처리시스템 등의 접근권한 관리, 접근통제시스템 설치, 고유식별정보 등의 암호화, 보안프로그램의 설치 등
물리적 조치 : 전산실, 자료보관실 등 개인정보 보관장소에 대한 접근통제