Criminal Defense

Public Place Molestation Defense Lawyer

Public Place Molestation Defense Lawyer | Contesting Intent and Contact in Crowded-Place Cases

Summary

Public place molestation (공중밀집장소추행) is prosecuted under Article 13 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment of Sexual Crimes, which punishes indecent acts committed by taking advantage of a crowded location such as public transportation, a stadium, or a theater. Because these settings are physically packed, incidental contact is common and the case usually turns entirely on whether the touching was intentional and whether it actually happened as described. Unlike many sex offense cases, there is frequently no eyewitness other than the accuser, so CCTV footage, seating/standing position, and the consistency of the complainant's statement become decisive. A conviction can result in imprisonment or a fine, and separately trigger registration and notification obligations, so how the case is handled from the first police summons matters.

Criminal · Sex Offense Related law: Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment of Sexual Crimes Defendant / Accused

Public Place Molestation Defense | What the Prosecution Must Prove

Article 13 does not require force or threat like other indecent act charges — it only requires that the act took place in a crowded public location and that the defendant touched the victim in a way found to be indecent. Each element below is where the defense typically pushes back.

Location Element

"Crowded Public Place" Requirement
The statute covers public transportation, elevators, escalators, and other places where large numbers of people are packed together (성폭력범죄의 처벌 등에 관한 특례법 제13조). Courts examine actual crowd density at the time, not just the category of location — a nearly empty subway car late at night may not qualify even though it is technically public transportation.

Conduct Element

"Indecent Act" (추행)
The touching must be objectively indecent by the standard of an ordinary person and must offend the victim's sexual self-determination. Brief, ambiguous, or unavoidable contact caused by crowd movement is a central point of dispute, since courts distinguish deliberate touching from contact that any commuter could experience.

Mental Element

Intent (고의)
Because no force or coercion needs to be shown, intent becomes the main battleground. The prosecution must prove the defendant deliberately initiated or continued the contact knowing it was unwanted, rather than the contact being accidental due to crowding, sudden train movement, or being pushed by other passengers.

Attempt

Attempted Molestation (추행미수)
Attempt is also punishable, so even a reaching motion that a witness or camera captures before actual contact is made can be charged. Whether the act reached the stage of an attempt versus mere movement within personal space is often argued separately from whether contact occurred.

Note on Aggravating Circumstances

If the victim is a minor or the act is accompanied by other conduct such as filming, separate and more serious charges can be added on top of Article 13, so the scope of the accusation needs to be checked carefully rather than assumed from the initial complaint.

Public Place Molestation Defense | Disputing Intent: Accident, Misidentification, or Deliberate Act?

Most defense strategies in these cases concentrate on intent because the physical setting itself explains a great deal of unwanted contact without anyone intending it.

Crowd Dynamics as an Explanation

Sudden braking, doors closing, or a surge of passengers boarding can cause genuine unintentional contact. Documenting the train schedule, station congestion at that time, or the specific car number can support an argument that contact was a byproduct of crowding rather than a deliberate act.

Duration and Repetition

A single momentary touch is treated differently from repeated or prolonged contact. Investigators and courts often look at how long the alleged contact lasted and whether it recurred after the complainant moved away, since repetition after an obvious chance to stop is harder to characterize as accidental.

Body Position and Line of Sight

Where the defendant's hand, body, or gaze was positioned relative to the complainant — as reconstructed from CCTV angles or witness accounts — is used to argue for or against deliberate intent. The defense often requests reenactment or detailed diagrams rather than relying on the complainant's verbal description alone.

Public Place Molestation Defense | Evidence: CCTV, Statement Consistency, and Corroboration

Because these cases rarely have independent witnesses, the outcome often depends on what can be objectively verified rather than on competing accounts.

CCTV and Transit Footage

Subway and bus operators retain footage for a limited period, so requesting preservation of CCTV early — through the police or a formal preservation request — can be critical before it is automatically deleted. Footage quality and angle often cannot show contact itself but can show relative position and movement, which is still useful for the defense.

Consistency of the Complainant's Statement

Investigators compare the complainant's statement given to police, any 112 report made at the scene, and later testimony for inconsistencies in details such as which hand was used, the exact location touched, and the sequence of events. Material inconsistencies can be raised to challenge the reliability of the accusation, though minor discrepancies are often treated as normal memory variation rather than fabrication.

Bystander and Companion Testimony

If a friend, coworker, or other passenger was present, their account of what they observed — or notably did not observe — can corroborate or undercut either side's version. The defense should identify and, where appropriate, request statements from anyone who was nearby.

Public Place Molestation Defense | How This Differs From Other Indecent Act Charges

Article 13 is a distinct offense from general indecent act by force (형법 제298조) precisely because it does not require violence or intimidation, which changes what the defense needs to focus on.

No Force Requirement Changes the Fight

Since force or threat is not an element, arguing that no force was used is not a defense here — the entire case turns on whether contact happened at all and whether it was intentional, which is why factual and evidentiary disputes dominate these cases far more than in force-based indecent act charges.

Sentencing and Collateral Consequences

A conviction under Article 13 carries imprisonment of up to three years or a fine of up to 30 million won (성폭력범죄의 처벌 등에 관한 특례법 제13조), and separately may trigger sex offender registration and disclosure obligations under related statutes depending on the sentence. These collateral consequences are often as significant to a defendant's life as the criminal penalty itself, and should be discussed early with counsel even if a resolution short of trial, such as a fine, is being considered.

Public Place Molestation Defense | From Police Summons to Resolution

Initial Consultation and Case Review
Before the first police interview, counsel reviews the accusation, the location and time involved, and any available footage or witnesses to assess what is actually in dispute.

Evidence Preservation
Requests to preserve CCTV footage from transit operators or buildings are made promptly, since this footage is often deleted on a rolling basis within days to a few weeks.

Police Investigation and Interview
The defendant attends the police interview, typically with counsel present, where the statement given is compared against the complainant's account and any physical evidence gathered so far.

Prosecutorial Review
The case moves to the prosecutor's office, where a decision is made to indict, offer a summary order (fine), or close the case without charge (불기소), depending on the strength of the evidence for intent and contact.

Trial or Resolution
If indicted, the case proceeds to trial where the contested facts — intent, contact, and location density — are argued before the court; many cases are otherwise resolved through summary fine proceedings or dismissal at the investigation stage.

Public Place Molestation Defense | How Fees Are Determined

Retainer Fee
Set based on the stage at which counsel is retained (police investigation, prosecutorial stage, or trial) and the complexity of the evidentiary dispute, particularly whether CCTV analysis or expert review is needed.

Success Fee
If agreed, typically tied to specific case outcomes such as non-indictment, acquittal, or a summary fine disposition rather than a guaranteed result, and is discussed and fixed in the engagement agreement.

Disbursements
Includes costs such as document retrieval, footage preservation requests, and expert consultation fees where relevant, billed separately from the retainer.

Additional Proceedings
If the case involves related civil claims for damages or separate administrative consequences (such as registration review), fees for those proceedings are calculated separately from the criminal defense fee.

※ Costs vary depending on case complexity and specific circumstances; exact fees will be provided during consultation. No specific outcome is guaranteed.

Public Place Molestation Defense | Self-Check for the Accused

1️⃣ Right After Being Accused

Do you remember exactly where you were standing or sitting, and where the complainant was?
Did you make any physical contact at all, even incidental, that you can identify?
Is there a possibility the train or bus movement caused unintended contact?
Did anyone nearby appear to witness what happened?

2️⃣ Preparing for the Police Interview

Have you identified the exact transit line, car number, and time to help locate CCTV?
Have you avoided giving a detailed account to police before consulting counsel?
Do you have a consistent, honest account of your movements that day?
Are you aware that inconsistent statements across interviews can be used against you later?

3️⃣ Evidence Preservation

Have you or your counsel requested CCTV preservation before it is automatically deleted?
Have you identified any companions or acquaintances who were with you at the time?
Do you have phone location data or transit card records confirming your route?

4️⃣ If a Summary Fine or Indictment Is Issued

Do you understand the difference between accepting a summary fine and contesting the case at trial?
Have you discussed the collateral consequences of a conviction, including possible registration obligations?
Have you considered whether the evidence realistically supports the charge as filed?

Frequently Asked Questions

Q. I was accused on the subway but I don't think I touched anyone — what should I do first?

A. Avoid making detailed statements to the complainant or bystanders at the scene, and try to note the exact car, time, and your position as soon as possible. Contact counsel before the police interview so that CCTV preservation requests can be made quickly, since transit footage is often deleted within days.

Q. Can I be charged even if there was no violence or threat involved?

A. Yes. Article 13 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment of Sexual Crimes (성폭력범죄의 처벌 등에 관한 특례법 제13조) does not require force or threat — it only requires an indecent act committed by taking advantage of a crowded public place, so a charge can be filed based solely on the alleged touching itself.

Q. What if the contact was accidental due to the crowded train?

A. Accidental contact caused by crowding is not a crime because the intent element is not satisfied. The key is building an evidentiary record — such as CCTV, crowd density at the time, and the duration of contact — that supports the accidental nature of the touching rather than relying only on your own account.

Q. Is there always CCTV in these cases?

A. Not always, and even where CCTV exists, it may not clearly show contact due to angle or crowding. This is one reason these cases often turn heavily on the consistency of statements and any available witness accounts rather than video alone.

Q. What happens if the case ends in a summary fine (약식명령)?

A. A summary fine is a paper-based procedure without a full trial, resulting in a fine if accepted. It still constitutes a criminal conviction and can carry the same collateral consequences, such as registration review, so whether to accept it or request formal trial should be considered carefully rather than automatically.

Q. Will I be registered as a sex offender if convicted?

A. Registration and notification obligations depend on the specific sentence and other statutory conditions, not automatically on every conviction under Article 13. This is a separate legal determination from the criminal sentence itself and should be reviewed with counsel based on the specific disposition.

Q. Can the case be settled with the complainant to avoid prosecution?

A. Article 13 is not subject to the same victim-complaint requirement (반의사불벌죄) structure as some other offenses, so reaching an agreement with the complainant does not automatically terminate the case, though it can be considered favorably at the prosecutorial or sentencing stage. Whether and how to pursue this should be discussed with counsel given the specific facts.

Q. What if I am falsely accused due to mistaken identity in a crowded car?

A. Misidentification is a recognized risk in crowded settings, especially when the complainant identifies someone after the fact without having clearly seen the person at the moment of contact. Establishing your exact position, clothing, and movement through CCTV or witness accounts is central to this type of defense.

Q. How long does the investigation typically take?

A. The timeline varies depending on whether CCTV needs to be obtained and analyzed and how quickly the parties are interviewed, and can range from a few weeks to several months before a prosecutorial decision is made. Cases with clear objective evidence tend to move faster than those relying primarily on conflicting statements.

Q. Should I attend the police interview alone?

A. You are legally entitled to have counsel present during the interview, and given how much weight is placed on the consistency of statements in these cases, most defendants benefit from preparing carefully and having counsel accompany them.

Official References

개인정보처리방침

법무법인 프런티어(이하 “사무소”)는 개인정보보호법에 따라 정보주체의 개인정보 및 권익을 보호하고 개인정보와 관련된 정보주체의 고충을 신속하고 원활하게 처리하기 위하여 본 개인정보 처리방침을 수립·공개합니다.

제 1 조 수집하는 개인정보의 항목, 목적, 방법
제 2 조 개인정보의 처리 및 보유기간
제 3 조 개인정보의 제3자 제공
제 4 조 개인정보 처리업무의 위탁
제 5 조 정보주체의 권리·의무 및 그 행사방법
제 6 조 개인정보의 파기
제 7 조 의견수렴 및 불만처리
제 8 조 개인정보 처리방침의 변경
제 9 조 개인정보의 안전성 확보 조치

제 1 조 (수집하는 개인정보의 항목, 목적, 방법)
① 게시판 글 작성 시 필수 항목에 대한 수집목적은 ‘별도의 구체적 상담을 위하여’이며 수집항목은 ‘이름, 이메일, 연락처’입니다.
② 전항 외에 고객의 서비스 이용 과정이나 요청 사항 처리 과정에서 ‘IP주소, 접속로그, 단말기 및 환경정보, 서비스 이용기록, 쿠키’와 같은 정보들이 자동으로 수집 및 저장될 수 있으며, 이 때의 수집목적은 ‘사용자 홈페이지 이용, 사이트 이용에 대한 문의 민원 등 고객 고충 처리’입니다.
③ 사무소는 ‘홈페이지 고객 문의/고충 처리 시 전화 또는 인터넷을 통한 상담’과 같은 방법으로 개인정보를 수집합니다

제 2 조 (개인정보의 처리 및 보유기간)
관계법령의 규정에 따라 개인정보를 보존하여야 하는 의무가 있는 경우가 아닌 한, 정보주체의 개인정보는 원칙적으로 해당 개인정보의 처리목적이 달성될 때까지 보유 및 이용되며, 그 목적이 달성되면 지체 없이 파기됩니다.

제 3 조 (개인정보의 제3자 제공)
사무소는 정보주체의 개인정보를 본 처리방침에서 명시한 목적에 한해서만 처리하며 정보주체의 사전동의가 있는 경우 또는 개인정보보호법 등 관계법령의 규정에 의거한 경우에만 개인정보를 제3자에게 제공합니다. 사무소는 현재 개인정보를 제3자에게 제공하지 않고 있습니다.

제 4 조 (개인정보 처리업무의 위탁)
사무소는 현재 귀하의 개인정보 보호를 위해 귀하의 개인정보를 직접 취급 관리하고 있습니다. 단, 향후 보다 전문적인 서비스를 제공하기 위하여 제3의 전문기관에 귀하의 정보를 위탁할 필요가 있다고 판단되는 경우, 귀하의 사전 동의 하에 개인정보에 대한 취급을 위탁할 수 있습니다.

제 5 조 (정보주체의 권리·의무 및 그 행사방법)
① 정보주체는 개인정보보호법 등 관계법령이 정하는 바에 따라 사무소에 대해 개인정보의 열람, 정정 및 삭제, 처리정지 요구 등 개인정보 보호 관련 권리를 행사할 수 있습니다.
② 제1항에 따른 권리행사는 정보주체의 법정대리인이나 위임을 받은 사람을 통해서도 할 수 있습니다. 다만, 이 경우에는 개인정보보호법 시행규칙에 따른 위임장을 사무소에 제출하여야 합니다.
③ 사무소는 정보주체의 권리행사에 대하여 개인정보보호법 등 관계법령이 정하는 바에 따라 지체 없이 조치하겠습니다.

제 6 조 (개인정보의 파기)
① 사무소는 원칙적으로 개인정보의 처리목적이 달성된 경우 등 그 개인정보가 불필요하게 되었을 때에는 지체 없이 해당 개인정보를 파기합니다.
② 사무소가 관계법령의 규정에 따라 개인정보를 파기하지 아니하고 보존하여야 하는 경우에는 해당 개인정보 또는 개인정보파일을 다른 개인정보와 분리해서 저장·관리 합니다.
③ 사무소는 파기사유가 발생한 개인정보를 선정하여 개인정보 보호책임자의 승인을 받아 해당 개인정보를 파기합니다.
④ 사무소는 파기하여야 할 개인정보가 전자적 파일 형태인 경우 복원이 불가능한 방법으로 영구 삭제하며, 이외의 기록물, 인쇄물, 서면, 그 밖의 기록매체인 경우 파쇄 또는 소각합니다.

제 7 조 (의견수렴 및 불만처리)
정보주체는 개인정보 보호 관련 문의, 불만처리, 피해구제 등에 관한 사항을 아래 개인정보 보호책임자 또는 담당부서에 문의하실 수 있습니다. 사무소는 정보주체의 문의에 대하여 신속하고 충분한 답변을 드릴 것입니다.

개인정보 보호 책임자 : 변호사
연락처 : 02.

제 8 조 (개인정보 처리방침의 변경)
사무소의 개인정보 처리방침은 관련 법령, 지침 및 사무소 내부규정에 따라 변경될 수 있으며, 개인정보 처리방침이 변경되는 경우 관련 법령이 정하는 방법에 따라 공개합니다.

제 9 조 (개인정보의 안전성 확보 조치)
사무소는 개인정보의 안전성 확보를 위해 다음과 같은 조치를 취하고 있습니다.
관리적 조치 : 내부관리계획의 수립 및 시행, 구성원에 대한 정기적인 개인정보 보호교육 등
기술적 조치 : 개인정보처리시스템 등의 접근권한 관리, 접근통제시스템 설치, 고유식별정보 등의 암호화, 보안프로그램의 설치 등
물리적 조치 : 전산실, 자료보관실 등 개인정보 보관장소에 대한 접근통제