법무법인 프런티어
Design Protection Act Lawyer
Design Protection Act Lawyer | Registration, Infringement, and Invalidation Explained
A "design" under Korean law is the shape, pattern, color, or combination thereof of an article (or part of an article) that creates an aesthetic impression through sight (디자인보호법 제2조 제1호). To be registered, a design must be novel and not easily conceivable from existing designs (디자인보호법 제33조). Disputes typically arise in three forms: a rights holder suing a competitor for making or selling a similar-looking product, a defendant petitioning to invalidate the plaintiff's design registration, or a party contesting KIPO's refusal of a design application. Because "similarity" is judged from the perspective of an ordinary consumer rather than a strict technical comparison, outcomes are highly fact-specific.
Design Protection Act | What Makes a Design Registrable — and What Can Invalidate It
Design registration is not automatic. KIPO examines each application against several statutory requirements, and the same requirements are later re-examined when a competitor files an invalidation trial. Understanding these requirements up front helps both applicants and defendants assess their exposure.
A design must be tied to an 'article' — a shape, pattern, or color (or combination) applied to a physical product that appeals visually (디자인보호법 제2조 제1호). Purely functional shapes dictated solely by the article's function generally fall outside protection, which becomes a key defense in infringement cases.
A design must not have been publicly known, publicly worked, or described in a publication before the filing date, whether in Korea or abroad (디자인보호법 제33조 제1항). Prior public disclosure — including the applicant's own product launch without a grace-period filing — is one of the most common grounds cited in invalidation trials.
Even a technically novel design can be refused or invalidated if it could easily have been created by combining or modifying publicly known designs (디자인보호법 제33조 제2항). This is a frequent battleground because it involves a judgment call about what a designer of ordinary skill would find obvious.
Where two or more applicants file similar designs, only the first-filed application can be registered, and identical same-day filings require the applicants to agree on who proceeds (디자인보호법 제46조). This makes filing timing itself a strategic and sometimes disputed issue.
A registered design can be invalidated through a trial before KIPO's Intellectual Property Trial and Appeal Board if it did not meet the requirements above at the time of registration, among other grounds (디자인보호법 제121조). This is the primary tool for a defendant sued for infringement to challenge the validity of the plaintiff's right.
A Registered Design Is Not Automatically Bulletproof
Registration by KIPO creates a presumption of validity, but it does not foreclose a later invalidation challenge. In practice, infringement lawsuits and invalidation trials are often litigated in parallel, with the outcome of one affecting the other.
Design Protection Act | How Infringement and Similarity Are Actually Judged
Most disputes that reach our office start with a simple question: does the other party's product look similar enough to matter? Korean courts and KIPO apply a structured — but still fact-heavy — test to answer that.
The 'Ordinary Observer' Standard
Similarity between two designs is assessed from the perspective of an ordinary consumer viewing the overall visual impression, not by mechanically comparing individual features side by side (디자인보호법 제2조 제1호 관련 판례 법리). Courts tend to give more weight to the dominant, easily noticeable parts of the design — such as the front-facing shape of a product — than to minor details on the back or bottom.
Scope of the Registered Design
The protected scope is defined by the drawings and description submitted at registration, including any claimed 'partial design' covering only part of an article (디자인보호법 제2조 제1호). A common defense strategy is arguing that the accused product falls outside the specific shape shown in the registration drawings, even if the general concept is similar.
Remedies Available to the Right Holder
A design right holder can seek an injunction to stop manufacture, sale, or import of the infringing product, along with destruction of the infringing goods and tools used to make them (디자인보호법 제113조). Damages can also be claimed, and the Act provides several methods for calculating loss, including the infringer's profits (디자인보호법 제115조).
Design Protection Act | Challenging a Design Registration Through Invalidation
If you are accused of infringing a registered design, one of the most effective responses is to examine whether the registration should have been granted in the first place.
Building a Prior Art Search
The core of most invalidation petitions is finding a prior design — a product, catalog, patent drawing, or online listing — that predates the registered design's filing date and looks substantially similar (디자인보호법 제33조 제1항). Because online marketplaces and design databases are searchable, this evidence-gathering stage often determines whether a petition is worth filing.
The Grace Period Exception
An applicant who disclosed their own design (for example, by launching the product) before filing may still register it if the application is filed within twelve months of that disclosure and the exception is properly claimed (디자인보호법 제36조). Whether this exception was correctly invoked is frequently scrutinized in invalidation proceedings.
Trial and Appeal Route
Invalidation petitions are heard by the Intellectual Property Trial and Appeal Board, and an adverse decision can be appealed to the Patent Court and ultimately the Supreme Court (디자인보호법 제186조). Because this track runs separately from a civil infringement suit, coordinating timing between the two proceedings is often a strategic decision.
Design Protection Act | Criminal Liability and Border Enforcement
Design infringement is not purely a civil matter — the Act also carries criminal penalties, and rights holders have tools to stop infringing goods at customs.
Criminal Penalties for Infringement
Deliberate infringement of a registered design right can be punished by imprisonment of up to seven years or a fine, and prosecution generally requires a complaint from the right holder (디자인보호법 제220조). In practice, a criminal complaint is sometimes used alongside a civil suit to increase pressure toward settlement, though prosecutors independently assess whether intent and infringement are proven.
Customs Seizure of Infringing Goods
A design right holder can apply to Korea Customs Service to have suspected infringing imports or exports suspended at the border, which is often faster than waiting for a court injunction. This route is particularly relevant where the accused goods are manufactured overseas and imported for sale in Korea.
Design Protection Act | From Initial Consultation to Resolution
We review the registered design certificate, drawings, and the accused product (or the competing design you want to challenge) to form a preliminary view on similarity and validity.
For infringement defense, we search for prior designs that could invalidate the plaintiff's registration; for enforcement, we analyze whether the accused product falls within the registered design's scope.
Depending on the client's position, we prepare a cease-and-desist letter to a suspected infringer, or a formal response contesting an infringement allegation.
We file a civil infringement action seeking an injunction and damages, and/or an invalidation trial petition with the Intellectual Property Trial and Appeal Board, coordinating the timing of parallel proceedings where relevant.
Cases proceed through hearings, expert opinions on similarity where needed, and settlement negotiations; adverse trial decisions can be appealed to the Patent Court.
Design Protection Act | How Fees Are Calculated
Generally set based on the complexity of the design comparison involved, whether the matter is a single infringement claim or includes a parallel invalidation trial, and the number of registered designs at issue.
For infringement suits, often structured as a percentage of damages awarded or the value of an injunction obtained; for invalidation trials, typically a fixed additional fee contingent on the registration being invalidated.
Where extensive searching of design databases, overseas catalogs, or marketplace listings is needed to build an invalidation case, this may be billed separately depending on scope.
KIPO trial fees, court filing fees, and any expert opinion fees on design similarity are separate from attorney fees and are billed as incurred.
Applications to Korea Customs Service for suspension of suspected infringing imports/exports involve a distinct, generally lower-cost filing process compared to full litigation.
※ Costs vary depending on case complexity and specific circumstances; exact fees will be provided during consultation. No specific outcome is guaranteed.
Design Protection Act | Self-Check Before You Contact a Lawyer
1️⃣ If You Received an Infringement Warning
- Do you have the plaintiff's design registration certificate and drawings, not just a verbal claim?
- Can you identify any product on the market before the registration's filing date that looks similar?
- Does your product's shape differ in ways visible to an ordinary consumer, not just technical details?
- Have you kept records of when you started manufacturing or selling your product?
2️⃣ If You Want to Register a Design
- Have you disclosed or sold the product publicly before filing, and if so, when exactly?
- Do you have clear drawings or photographs showing all views of the design?
- Are you seeking protection for the whole product or just a distinctive part of it?
- Is a competitor's similar product already on the market that could justify an expedited examination request?
3️⃣ If You Are Considering an Invalidation Petition
- Have you located a specific prior design with a verifiable date predating the registration's filing?
- Is there a civil infringement suit already filed against you, and what is its current schedule?
- Could the grace period exception apply to the registrant's own prior disclosure?
- Do you need to request a stay of the civil suit while the invalidation trial proceeds?
4️⃣ If You Are Enforcing Your Design Right
- Have you documented sales and estimated profits to support a damages claim?
- Do you know where the infringing goods are manufactured, sold, or imported from?
- Would a customs suspension application be faster than a court injunction in your case?
- Have you sent a cease-and-desist letter and preserved the infringer's response?
Frequently Asked Questions
Official References
개인정보처리방침
제 1 조 수집하는 개인정보의 항목, 목적, 방법
제 2 조 개인정보의 처리 및 보유기간
제 3 조 개인정보의 제3자 제공
제 4 조 개인정보 처리업무의 위탁
제 5 조 정보주체의 권리·의무 및 그 행사방법
제 6 조 개인정보의 파기
제 7 조 의견수렴 및 불만처리
제 8 조 개인정보 처리방침의 변경
제 9 조 개인정보의 안전성 확보 조치
제 1 조 (수집하는 개인정보의 항목, 목적, 방법)
① 게시판 글 작성 시 필수 항목에 대한 수집목적은 ‘별도의 구체적 상담을 위하여’이며 수집항목은 ‘이름, 이메일, 연락처’입니다.
② 전항 외에 고객의 서비스 이용 과정이나 요청 사항 처리 과정에서 ‘IP주소, 접속로그, 단말기 및 환경정보, 서비스 이용기록, 쿠키’와 같은 정보들이 자동으로 수집 및 저장될 수 있으며, 이 때의 수집목적은 ‘사용자 홈페이지 이용, 사이트 이용에 대한 문의 민원 등 고객 고충 처리’입니다.
③ 사무소는 ‘홈페이지 고객 문의/고충 처리 시 전화 또는 인터넷을 통한 상담’과 같은 방법으로 개인정보를 수집합니다
제 2 조 (개인정보의 처리 및 보유기간)
관계법령의 규정에 따라 개인정보를 보존하여야 하는 의무가 있는 경우가 아닌 한, 정보주체의 개인정보는 원칙적으로 해당 개인정보의 처리목적이 달성될 때까지 보유 및 이용되며, 그 목적이 달성되면 지체 없이 파기됩니다.
제 3 조 (개인정보의 제3자 제공)
사무소는 정보주체의 개인정보를 본 처리방침에서 명시한 목적에 한해서만 처리하며 정보주체의 사전동의가 있는 경우 또는 개인정보보호법 등 관계법령의 규정에 의거한 경우에만 개인정보를 제3자에게 제공합니다. 사무소는 현재 개인정보를 제3자에게 제공하지 않고 있습니다.
제 4 조 (개인정보 처리업무의 위탁)
사무소는 현재 귀하의 개인정보 보호를 위해 귀하의 개인정보를 직접 취급 관리하고 있습니다. 단, 향후 보다 전문적인 서비스를 제공하기 위하여 제3의 전문기관에 귀하의 정보를 위탁할 필요가 있다고 판단되는 경우, 귀하의 사전 동의 하에 개인정보에 대한 취급을 위탁할 수 있습니다.
제 5 조 (정보주체의 권리·의무 및 그 행사방법)
① 정보주체는 개인정보보호법 등 관계법령이 정하는 바에 따라 사무소에 대해 개인정보의 열람, 정정 및 삭제, 처리정지 요구 등 개인정보 보호 관련 권리를 행사할 수 있습니다.
② 제1항에 따른 권리행사는 정보주체의 법정대리인이나 위임을 받은 사람을 통해서도 할 수 있습니다. 다만, 이 경우에는 개인정보보호법 시행규칙에 따른 위임장을 사무소에 제출하여야 합니다.
③ 사무소는 정보주체의 권리행사에 대하여 개인정보보호법 등 관계법령이 정하는 바에 따라 지체 없이 조치하겠습니다.
제 6 조 (개인정보의 파기)
① 사무소는 원칙적으로 개인정보의 처리목적이 달성된 경우 등 그 개인정보가 불필요하게 되었을 때에는 지체 없이 해당 개인정보를 파기합니다.
② 사무소가 관계법령의 규정에 따라 개인정보를 파기하지 아니하고 보존하여야 하는 경우에는 해당 개인정보 또는 개인정보파일을 다른 개인정보와 분리해서 저장·관리 합니다.
③ 사무소는 파기사유가 발생한 개인정보를 선정하여 개인정보 보호책임자의 승인을 받아 해당 개인정보를 파기합니다.
④ 사무소는 파기하여야 할 개인정보가 전자적 파일 형태인 경우 복원이 불가능한 방법으로 영구 삭제하며, 이외의 기록물, 인쇄물, 서면, 그 밖의 기록매체인 경우 파쇄 또는 소각합니다.
제 7 조 (의견수렴 및 불만처리)
정보주체는 개인정보 보호 관련 문의, 불만처리, 피해구제 등에 관한 사항을 아래 개인정보 보호책임자 또는 담당부서에 문의하실 수 있습니다. 사무소는 정보주체의 문의에 대하여 신속하고 충분한 답변을 드릴 것입니다.
개인정보 보호 책임자 : 변호사
연락처 : 02.
제 8 조 (개인정보 처리방침의 변경)
사무소의 개인정보 처리방침은 관련 법령, 지침 및 사무소 내부규정에 따라 변경될 수 있으며, 개인정보 처리방침이 변경되는 경우 관련 법령이 정하는 방법에 따라 공개합니다.
제 9 조 (개인정보의 안전성 확보 조치)
사무소는 개인정보의 안전성 확보를 위해 다음과 같은 조치를 취하고 있습니다.
관리적 조치 : 내부관리계획의 수립 및 시행, 구성원에 대한 정기적인 개인정보 보호교육 등
기술적 조치 : 개인정보처리시스템 등의 접근권한 관리, 접근통제시스템 설치, 고유식별정보 등의 암호화, 보안프로그램의 설치 등
물리적 조치 : 전산실, 자료보관실 등 개인정보 보관장소에 대한 접근통제