Unlicensed Medical Practice Lawyer | What Counts as a Medical Act, and What Happens Next
Summary
Under the Medical Service Act, only a person who has obtained a medical license from the Minister of Health and Welfare may perform "medical acts," and anyone else who does so can face criminal prosecution regardless of whether harm actually occurred (의료법 제27조 제1항, 제87조의2). This applies not only to obvious cases like unlicensed clinics, but also to beauty procedures, semi-permanent tattooing, chiropractic-style manipulation, and even licensed doctors or nurses acting outside the scope of their own license. Because the statute does not define "medical act" with precision, whether a specific act qualifies is decided case by case through court precedent, and that single question can determine guilt, sentence, and whether a business can keep operating.
Criminal · Healthcare RegulationRelated law: Medical Service Act (의료법)
Unlicensed Medical Practice | What the Medical Service Act Actually Prohibits
The core prohibition is simple to state but hard to apply: no one without a medical license may perform a 'medical act.' The following are the recurring categories of disputes that come up in practice.
Article 27(1)
General ban on unlicensed medical acts
Only doctors, dentists, oriental medicine doctors, and midwives who hold the relevant license may perform medical acts within their licensed scope (의료법 제27조 제1항). Anyone else performing such an act, even without any resulting injury, satisfies the basic requirement for prosecution. The prosecution does not need to prove actual harm to the recipient.
Case-law standard
The definition of 'medical act' is judge-made, not statutory
The Medical Service Act itself does not define 'medical act.' The Supreme Court has instead built a working definition through case law: an act that requires medical expertise to prevent risk of harm to the human body, evaluated by considering the purpose, method, and potential danger of the act. This means borderline acts (e.g. semi-permanent makeup, certain skin procedures, some manual therapies) are litigated individually rather than resolved by a bright-line rule.
Scope-of-license issue
Licensed professionals acting outside their own scope
A licensed doctor, dentist, or nurse can still be charged if they perform an act reserved for a different type of license (e.g. a general physician performing a dental procedure), or if a nurse performs an act reserved for doctors. These cases turn on whether the specific act fell within the defendant's own licensed scope, not on whether the person held any license at all.
Aggravated form
Repeated or business-scale unlicensed practice
Where unlicensed medical practice is conducted as an ongoing business (e.g. an unlicensed clinic operating continuously, or a chain of unlicensed procedure shops), courts tend to treat this more severely than an isolated incident, and prosecutors more often pursue detention or higher fines rather than a simple summary indictment.
Exceptions that are frequently misunderstood
Not every hands-on service involving the body is a medical act — general skin care, basic massage, and simple beauty services performed with common tools are generally treated as outside the Medical Service Act. However, the line shifts depending on the tools used (e.g. needles, lasers, certain chemical peels) and the claims made about the service, so a practice that seems similar to a lawful beauty service can still cross into unlicensed medical practice.
Unlicensed Medical Practice | Whether the Act Actually Qualifies as a 'Medical Act'
Because the statute does not define 'medical act,' this is almost always the first and most contested issue in these cases. The outcome depends heavily on the specific technique, tools, and context.
The three-factor test courts actually use
Courts weigh (1) the purpose of the act — diagnosis, treatment, or prevention of disease versus pure cosmetic enhancement, (2) the method used — whether it involves piercing skin, chemicals, or specialized equipment, and (3) the degree of health risk if performed by someone without medical training. No single factor is decisive on its own, which is why similar-looking services (e.g. two different semi-permanent eyebrow techniques) can be treated differently.
Common flashpoints: semi-permanent makeup, acupuncture-adjacent services, IV therapy
Semi-permanent makeup and tattooing that penetrate the dermis have repeatedly been found to be medical acts because of infection and scarring risk, even though many operators market them as 'beauty services.' Similarly, needle-based manual therapies marketed as 'non-medical acupuncture' and unlicensed IV or injection services are frequent subjects of prosecution because they involve breaking the skin barrier.
Why this determination decides the whole case
If the act is found not to be a medical act, the charge fails entirely regardless of who performed it or how often. Conversely, if it is found to be a medical act, the absence of any injury to the client does not help the defendant, because the offense is complete once the act itself is performed without a license (의료법 제27조 제1항).
Unlicensed Medical Practice | Criminal Penalties and Administrative/Health Insurance Fallout
Unlicensed medical practice carries both a criminal track and, for licensed professionals, an administrative track — and the two can move on separate timelines with different consequences.
Criminal penalties under the Medical Service Act
A person who performs a medical act without a license is subject to imprisonment for up to five years or a fine of up to 50 million won (의료법 제87조의2 제2항 제2호). Actual sentencing depends on scale, duration, whether any client was harmed, and whether the conduct was a one-off incident or an ongoing business.
Confiscation of proceeds and equipment
Courts frequently order confiscation or additional collection of the profits earned from unlicensed medical practice, and equipment used in the offense (needles, devices, chemicals) may also be seized as evidence or subject to confiscation, separate from any fine imposed.
License-holder exposure: administrative sanctions on top of criminal liability
If the defendant is a licensed doctor, dentist, or nurse who acted outside their licensed scope, a criminal conviction typically triggers a separate administrative disciplinary process by the health authority, which can result in suspension or revocation of the medical license — independent of, and often following, the criminal case outcome.
National Health Insurance recoupment risk for clinics
Where unlicensed practice occurred inside a nominally licensed clinic (for example, non-medical staff performing procedures billed as if a doctor performed them), the National Health Insurance Service can separately claw back reimbursements already paid, which is a financial exposure independent of the criminal fine.
Unlicensed Medical Practice | What a Defense Actually Focuses On
Because guilt turns so heavily on the 'medical act' classification, defense work concentrates on the specific facts of the technique used and the context in which it was performed, rather than on generic mitigation.
Challenging the medical-act classification with technical evidence
Where the technique is genuinely borderline, the defense gathers technical materials — the depth of skin penetration, the composition of substances used, comparable precedents involving similar techniques — to argue the specific act performed does not meet the case-law definition of a medical act.
Distinguishing a single incident from an ongoing business
Because sentencing severity is closely tied to scale and duration, documenting that the conduct was isolated or that it stopped promptly once a complaint arose can materially affect whether the case proceeds to indictment, summary indictment, or is resolved with a lower fine.
Coordinating the criminal case with a pending license disciplinary matter
For licensed professionals facing both prosecution and an administrative disciplinary review, timing and framing in the criminal case can influence the parallel administrative outcome, so the two matters are usually handled with a single coordinated strategy rather than independently.
Unlicensed Medical Practice | From Investigation to Case Resolution
1
Initial consultation and case assessment Review the specific technique or act at issue, the evidence already gathered by investigators (client statements, photos, equipment seized), and whether a summons has already been issued.
2
Police and prosecutor investigation stage Prepare a written statement or attend questioning with counsel present, focusing on the factual details relevant to whether the act qualifies as a medical act and the scale/duration of the conduct.
3
Prosecutorial disposition Depending on severity, the prosecutor may issue a summary indictment (fine only, no court appearance), a regular indictment for trial, or a non-indictment/deferred decision if the classification as a medical act is weak.
4
Trial or summary proceeding If indicted for trial, the case proceeds with argument over the medical-act classification, scale of conduct, and any harm caused; sentencing submissions address mitigating circumstances such as first offense or immediate cessation.
5
Parallel administrative process (if licensed) For licensed professionals, the health authority's disciplinary review typically follows the criminal case's conclusion, and preparing for both tracks together helps avoid inconsistent findings.
Unlicensed Medical Practice | How Fees Are Typically Structured
Retainer fee Set based on the investigative stage the case is at (pre-summons, post-summons, or post-indictment), the complexity of the medical-act classification issue, and whether expert technical evidence needs to be gathered.
Success fee If applicable, generally tied to a favorable disposition such as non-indictment, summary fine disposition instead of trial indictment, or a suspended sentence rather than a fine or imprisonment; details are agreed in advance and not linked to promising a specific outcome.
Expenses Covers costs such as obtaining expert opinions on the technique or substances used, transcription of investigative records, and travel for hearings outside the retained attorney's usual venue.
Dual-track cases Where both a criminal case and a license disciplinary proceeding are pending, fee structure is typically discussed separately for each track, since they involve different procedures and evidence.
※ Costs vary depending on case complexity and specific circumstances; exact fees will be provided during consultation. No specific outcome is guaranteed.
Unlicensed Medical Practice | Self-Check Before Your Consultation
1️⃣ For unlicensed operators (beauty shops, semi-permanent makeup, manual therapy)
Does your service involve breaking the skin (needles, blades, lasers, chemical peels)?
Have you received a summons, a police visit, or a civil complaint from a client?
Was the service marketed with any claim of treating a medical condition?
Has any client reported infection, scarring, or other physical harm?
2️⃣ For licensed doctors, dentists, or nurses accused of acting outside scope
Is the specific procedure at issue clearly within or outside your license category under the Medical Service Act?
Has the health authority already opened a separate disciplinary file in addition to the criminal referral?
Did another licensed professional (e.g. supervising doctor) authorize or instruct the act?
How long has this practice been ongoing, and is there a paper trail (charts, consent forms)?
3️⃣ Evidence and scale assessment
How many clients or incidents are involved, and over what time period?
What equipment or substances were seized, and do you have documentation of their composition or source?
Is there a prior conviction or administrative sanction for a similar issue?
Did you stop the conduct voluntarily before or after being contacted by authorities?
Frequently Asked Questions
Q. Can I be charged even if none of my clients were actually hurt?
A. Yes. The offense under the Medical Service Act is complete once an unlicensed person performs a medical act, regardless of whether any injury resulted (의료법 제27조 제1항, 제87조의2). Absence of harm can still be raised as a mitigating factor for sentencing, but it does not by itself prevent a conviction.
Q. Is semi-permanent makeup or eyebrow tattooing considered a medical act?
A. Techniques that penetrate the dermis have generally been treated as medical acts in Korean case law because of the associated infection and scarring risk, even when marketed purely as a beauty service. Whether a specific technique crosses that line depends on the depth of penetration and method used, so this is usually the central factual dispute in these cases.
Q. I'm a licensed nurse — can I still be charged with unlicensed medical practice?
A. Yes, if you performed an act reserved for doctors and outside a nurse's licensed scope, even though you hold a valid nursing license. The issue is not whether you have any license, but whether the specific act fell within the scope of the license you actually hold.
Q. What's the difference between a summary indictment and a regular indictment for this offense?
A. A summary indictment (약식기소) results in a fine imposed by written record without a court appearance, typically used for smaller-scale, first-time conduct. A regular indictment leads to a full criminal trial and is more likely where the conduct was large-scale, repeated, or caused injury.
Q. Will I lose my medical license if convicted?
A. A criminal conviction can trigger a separate administrative disciplinary review by the health authority, which may result in license suspension or, in serious cases, revocation. This administrative process is separate from the criminal case, though the outcome of the criminal case often affects it.
Q. Can the profits I made from an unlicensed clinic or shop be seized?
A. Courts commonly order confiscation of the proceeds earned from unlicensed medical practice, and equipment used in the offense may also be seized separately from any fine or sentence imposed.
Q. Does it matter if I stopped the practice as soon as I found out it was illegal?
A. Voluntarily and promptly stopping the conduct, especially before being contacted by authorities, is generally considered a favorable circumstance during sentencing negotiations or in seeking a more lenient disposition, though it does not eliminate the underlying charge.
Q. Is chiropractic-style manual therapy or 'non-medical acupuncture' legal in Korea?
A. This is one of the most litigated gray areas. Manual therapy that does not involve needles or breaking the skin is more often found to fall outside the Medical Service Act, while needle-based techniques marketed as 'non-medical acupuncture' have frequently been found to be medical acts requiring a license.
Q. What happens if the clinic I worked at gets investigated for insurance fraud related to unlicensed staff performing procedures?
A. In addition to criminal liability for the unlicensed act itself, the National Health Insurance Service may separately seek to recoup reimbursements already paid for procedures that were actually performed by unlicensed staff but billed as if performed by a licensed doctor.
법무법인 프런티어(이하 “사무소”)는 개인정보보호법에 따라 정보주체의 개인정보 및 권익을 보호하고 개인정보와 관련된 정보주체의 고충을 신속하고 원활하게 처리하기 위하여 본 개인정보 처리방침을 수립·공개합니다.
제 1 조 수집하는 개인정보의 항목, 목적, 방법
제 2 조 개인정보의 처리 및 보유기간
제 3 조 개인정보의 제3자 제공
제 4 조 개인정보 처리업무의 위탁
제 5 조 정보주체의 권리·의무 및 그 행사방법
제 6 조 개인정보의 파기
제 7 조 의견수렴 및 불만처리
제 8 조 개인정보 처리방침의 변경
제 9 조 개인정보의 안전성 확보 조치
제 1 조 (수집하는 개인정보의 항목, 목적, 방법)
① 게시판 글 작성 시 필수 항목에 대한 수집목적은 ‘별도의 구체적 상담을 위하여’이며 수집항목은 ‘이름, 이메일, 연락처’입니다.
② 전항 외에 고객의 서비스 이용 과정이나 요청 사항 처리 과정에서 ‘IP주소, 접속로그, 단말기 및 환경정보, 서비스 이용기록, 쿠키’와 같은 정보들이 자동으로 수집 및 저장될 수 있으며, 이 때의 수집목적은 ‘사용자 홈페이지 이용, 사이트 이용에 대한 문의 민원 등 고객 고충 처리’입니다.
③ 사무소는 ‘홈페이지 고객 문의/고충 처리 시 전화 또는 인터넷을 통한 상담’과 같은 방법으로 개인정보를 수집합니다
제 2 조 (개인정보의 처리 및 보유기간)
관계법령의 규정에 따라 개인정보를 보존하여야 하는 의무가 있는 경우가 아닌 한, 정보주체의 개인정보는 원칙적으로 해당 개인정보의 처리목적이 달성될 때까지 보유 및 이용되며, 그 목적이 달성되면 지체 없이 파기됩니다.
제 3 조 (개인정보의 제3자 제공)
사무소는 정보주체의 개인정보를 본 처리방침에서 명시한 목적에 한해서만 처리하며 정보주체의 사전동의가 있는 경우 또는 개인정보보호법 등 관계법령의 규정에 의거한 경우에만 개인정보를 제3자에게 제공합니다. 사무소는 현재 개인정보를 제3자에게 제공하지 않고 있습니다.
제 4 조 (개인정보 처리업무의 위탁)
사무소는 현재 귀하의 개인정보 보호를 위해 귀하의 개인정보를 직접 취급 관리하고 있습니다. 단, 향후 보다 전문적인 서비스를 제공하기 위하여 제3의 전문기관에 귀하의 정보를 위탁할 필요가 있다고 판단되는 경우, 귀하의 사전 동의 하에 개인정보에 대한 취급을 위탁할 수 있습니다.
제 5 조 (정보주체의 권리·의무 및 그 행사방법)
① 정보주체는 개인정보보호법 등 관계법령이 정하는 바에 따라 사무소에 대해 개인정보의 열람, 정정 및 삭제, 처리정지 요구 등 개인정보 보호 관련 권리를 행사할 수 있습니다.
② 제1항에 따른 권리행사는 정보주체의 법정대리인이나 위임을 받은 사람을 통해서도 할 수 있습니다. 다만, 이 경우에는 개인정보보호법 시행규칙에 따른 위임장을 사무소에 제출하여야 합니다.
③ 사무소는 정보주체의 권리행사에 대하여 개인정보보호법 등 관계법령이 정하는 바에 따라 지체 없이 조치하겠습니다.
제 6 조 (개인정보의 파기)
① 사무소는 원칙적으로 개인정보의 처리목적이 달성된 경우 등 그 개인정보가 불필요하게 되었을 때에는 지체 없이 해당 개인정보를 파기합니다.
② 사무소가 관계법령의 규정에 따라 개인정보를 파기하지 아니하고 보존하여야 하는 경우에는 해당 개인정보 또는 개인정보파일을 다른 개인정보와 분리해서 저장·관리 합니다.
③ 사무소는 파기사유가 발생한 개인정보를 선정하여 개인정보 보호책임자의 승인을 받아 해당 개인정보를 파기합니다.
④ 사무소는 파기하여야 할 개인정보가 전자적 파일 형태인 경우 복원이 불가능한 방법으로 영구 삭제하며, 이외의 기록물, 인쇄물, 서면, 그 밖의 기록매체인 경우 파쇄 또는 소각합니다.
제 7 조 (의견수렴 및 불만처리)
정보주체는 개인정보 보호 관련 문의, 불만처리, 피해구제 등에 관한 사항을 아래 개인정보 보호책임자 또는 담당부서에 문의하실 수 있습니다. 사무소는 정보주체의 문의에 대하여 신속하고 충분한 답변을 드릴 것입니다.
개인정보 보호 책임자 : 변호사
연락처 : 02.
제 8 조 (개인정보 처리방침의 변경)
사무소의 개인정보 처리방침은 관련 법령, 지침 및 사무소 내부규정에 따라 변경될 수 있으며, 개인정보 처리방침이 변경되는 경우 관련 법령이 정하는 방법에 따라 공개합니다.
제 9 조 (개인정보의 안전성 확보 조치)
사무소는 개인정보의 안전성 확보를 위해 다음과 같은 조치를 취하고 있습니다.
관리적 조치 : 내부관리계획의 수립 및 시행, 구성원에 대한 정기적인 개인정보 보호교육 등
기술적 조치 : 개인정보처리시스템 등의 접근권한 관리, 접근통제시스템 설치, 고유식별정보 등의 암호화, 보안프로그램의 설치 등
물리적 조치 : 전산실, 자료보관실 등 개인정보 보관장소에 대한 접근통제